Ask Osama bin Laden if he is better off now than he was four years ago

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guns Guns Guns
  • Start date Start date
Then Bush was right in saying that OBL ‘Not A Top Priority"

and Obama is guilty in ordering the murder of an innocent man....

Is that what you're concluding ?........lol

Bush for 7 years and Obama for 4 years has been killing people in Afghanistan for nothing and squandering the lives of US troops ?


Is this your new version of history.
 
Last edited:
bravo said:
Then Bush was right in saying that OBL ‘Not A Top Priority"

and Obama is guilty in ordering the murder of an innocent man....

Is that what you're concluding ?........lol

Bush for 7 years and Obama for 4 years has been killing people in Afghanistan for nothing and squandering the lives of US troops ?


Is this your new version of history.
Click to expand...

I bet this would make a real interesting conversation if you left out the hysteronics brother. I'm not trying to score points here. If I was I would be following the bouncing ball like everybody else.

You don't appear up to a real conversation about critical issues that may challenge the programming.

I get that.
 
blackascoal said:
I bet this would make a real interesting conversation if you left out the hysteronics brother. I'm not trying to score points here. If I was I would be following the bouncing ball like everybody else.

You don't appear up to a real conversation about critical issues that may challenge the programming.

I get that.
Click to expand...

My post was all valid conclusions drawn from your claim that OBL is innocent concerning the events of 9/11

No histrionics at all bro....."challenge the programming" ?.....I don't even get what thats suppose to mean....

and if would make for an interesting conversation if you ever decided to have one....

Obviously you're not up to responding to my post in an intelligent manner.....
 
it's awesome that osama is dead. But in term of that playing a part in this election, no data supports this assertion. Voters have consistently ranked the military/afghanistan/war on terror as one of their lowest priorities this time around

It is not 2004, and the narrative for this election is about the economy, jobs, healthcare, and energy.

From may, washington post poll:

n1ZXL.png

The categories of afghanistan and war on terror, don't even get into 1% territory. If you switch it to independents, it's 2% and 2% respectively.
"Other" consistently beats both those categories out.

lwn84.png

This poll is slightly different, the first was open ended, this is issues stated specifically. Obviously, we can say that many issues are "very" important to voters, but once again, terrorism/afghanistan, dead last on what people consider important.

There was also a cbs poll I can't find atm, that also ranked these issues in about the 2% zone.

National security/terrorism/911/Afghanistan/War on terror are absolutely, unequivocally, completely and totally irrelevant this election cycle.

Tl;dr - nobody is basing their decision to vote on bin laden being dead
 
bravo said:
My post was all valid conclusions drawn from your claim that OBL is innocent concerning the events of 9/11

No histrionics at all bro....."challenge the programming" ?.....I don't even get what thats suppose to mean....

and if would make for an interesting conversation if you ever decided to have one....

Obviously you're not up to responding to my post in an intelligent manner.....
Click to expand...

I found your bolded post lacking in seriousness.

It isn't me who said Bin Laden was innocent .. it was the FBI. Isn't that the conclusion when anyone has been thoroughly investigated for a crime and none is found?

In case you missed it, killing innocent people and squandering the lives of American troops is not new for American presidents.

Bush killed a hellof a lot of innocent people in Iraq while at the same time squandering the lives of American soldiers. You can close your eyes real tight and pretend otherwise if it makes you feel warm and fuzzy.

I know, you're surprised .. and we didn't lose nearly 60,000 American soldiers in Vietnam to prevent the mystical "domino effect" .. that never happened.

Did you have no knowledge of this before you asked your loaded question?

I asked you to produce evidence that Bin Laden was guilty of 9/11 and instead, you came back with loaded questions that you lose on.

Are you going to produce the evidence or what?

You and I don't have to discuss this issue at all brother. You aren't really up to it.
 
blackascoal said:
I found your bolded post lacking in seriousness.

It isn't me who said Bin Laden was innocent .. it was the FBI. Isn't that the conclusion when anyone has been thoroughly investigated for a crime and none is found?

Not possessing the proof required for legal action is not saying he is innocent.....like, not having the money to buy a house does not mean I have no money....
Haven't you ever been exposed to a logic course...or even using common sense....

In case you missed it, killing innocent people and squandering the lives of American troops is not new for American presidents.

Which has nothing to do with my claim about Obama....is he guilty of ordering and then bragging about the murder an innocent man ie OBL ?

Bush killed a hellof a lot of innocent people in Iraq while at the same time squandering the lives of American soldiers. You can close your eyes real tight and pretend otherwise if it makes you feel warm and fuzzy.

I know, you're surprised .. and we didn't lose nearly 60,000 American soldiers in Vietnam to prevent the mystical "domino effect" .. that never happened.

Did you have no knowledge of this before you asked your loaded question?

Does changing the topic make you think you're winning points ?

I asked you to produce evidence that Bin Laden was guilty of 9/11 and instead, you came back with loaded questions that you lose on.

Are you going to produce the evidence or what?

Personally, I believe his confessions to being involved in the planing and the attack.....I can't prove Hitler murdered 6 million Jews either or that Area 51 really exists...and you can't prove OBL was innocent of 9/11 involvement....
So what.....sue me....Its doesn't mean Hitler is innocent of the Holocaust or that there is no Area 51 in the dessert...
I'm not in the CIA or the FBI

You and I don't have to discuss this issue at all brother. You aren't really up to it.
If you want to be dismissed, consider yourself dismissed....
Click to expand...

The questions stand and they aren't even hard....

Was Bush right in saying that OBL was ‘Not A Top Priority" (remember how the Democrats ranted about this so many times in the last few years, praising Obama)

Is Obama guilty of ordering the murder of OBL, an innocent man....and so many other 'murder by drone' on the innocent AQ members....

Is that what you're concluding ?........lol

Have Bush, for 7 years and Obama for 4 years, been killing people in Afghanistan for nothing and squandering the lives of US troops in your opinion ?

They are reasonable conclusions for you if you believe OBL was an innocent man......
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top