At least 10 killed in New Orleans after driver ‘intentionally’ rams into crowd on Bourbon Street

Lionfish said:
I doubt she could ever find our southern border. The woman is a moron.
Click to expand...
There is some doubt about that....and to the degree that she actually is how much of that is alcohol/drug induced.

There is however no doubt that her plan is always to do as little work as possible.
 
Jarod said:
So you won’t answer my question?
Click to expand...
About the initial reporting that the truck crossed the border 2 days ago, and the FBI reporting it was 100% NOT a terrorist attack ?

Or Why Biden stopped the wall and removed Remain in Mexico?

Or why the Left hates Jews and Christians, but loves Islam?
 
Jarod said:
"When I said that the criminals coming in are far worse than the criminals we have in our country, that statement was constantly refuted by Democrats and the Fake News Media, but it turned out to be true. The crime rate in our country is at a level that nobody has ever seen before. Our hearts are with all of the innocent victims and their loved ones, including the brave officers of the New Orleans Police Department. The Trump Administration will fully support the City of New Orleans as they investigate and recover from this act of pure evil!"

What does New Orleans have to do with letting illegals in?
Click to expand...
This is about the crime rate. I think the part about illegals was an example of how the press has told you lies about the crime rate and helped the True Believers to ignore what was happening before their eyes.

Now, which poster here said this terrorist was an illegal? That post from tRump doesn't, nobody here did. You just "imaginationed" it right up out of thin air or "accidentally" thought when they were talking about the guy who lit the woman on fire they were talking about this because you really wanted them to...

Your first reaction to anything is to create a strawman and "demand" someone answer questions about it. While mine is to point out to you that you are once again making stuff up.
 
Jarod said:
Show me where she was appointed Border Tsar? You fell for the lies!
Click to expand...

While he didn't call it "Border Czar" he did say she would lead the response to the "challenges at the border"...

Pretending that isn't appointing her border czar is just you "imagining" things again.

Your side lost, because your side's argument was: Ignore what you see with your own eyes, what you hear with your own ears, what you feel with your own hands... ignore it all, and da*n well believe what we TELL you to believe....
 
Bigdog said:
There is no lie. Biden put Harris in charge of stopping the massive flow of illegals across the border.
Click to expand...
No......Biden was never President except in name....he was a paid front man for the Revolution......and the mass importation of people is a revolution program.

The claim that that the so-called Biden Administration wanted to stop the program was tripe invented for the rubes.
 
What we see here is that the American people still cant get their minds around the scope of the betrayal by our abusers.
 
AProudLefty said:
View attachment 39218
Click to expand...
Someone clue in the Orange Oaf and his followers that this guy was NOT a recent immigrant, illegal or otherwise. Jeezus, these MAGA ghouls have no class, no shame, no brains:

What we know about the New Orleans terror suspect: Why did he target a New Year's Eve crowd?​

Jabbar, a U.S. citizen and an Army veteran .....

www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/what-we-know-about-the-new-orleans-terror-suspect-why-did-he-target-a-new-years-eve-crowd/ar-AA1wOqFv?ocid=BingNewsSerp
 
Damocles said:
This is about the crime rate. I think the part about illegals was an example of how the press has told you lies about the crime rate and helped the True Believers to ignore what was happening before their eyes.

Now, which poster here said this terrorist was an illegal? That post from tRump doesn't, nobody here did. You just "imaginationed" it right up out of thin air or "accidentally" thought when they were talking about the guy who lit the woman on fire they were talking about this because you really wanted them to...

Your first reaction to anything is to create a strawman and "demand" someone answer questions about it. While mine is to point out to you that you are once again making stuff up.
Click to expand...
Haha! He was specifically trying to tie illegal immigration to what happened in NO, and several here fell for it. Open your eyes!
 
Damocles said:

While he didn't call it "Border Czar" he did say she would lead the response to the "challenges at the border"...

Pretending that isn't appointing her border czar is just you "imagining" things again.

Your side lost, because your side's argument was: Ignore what you see with your own eyes, what you hear with your own ears, what you feel with your own hands... ignore it all, and da*n well believe what we TELL you to believe....
Click to expand...
She was appointed to work on very specific parts of the challenge…. Can you tell us what those were? They were limited to specific parts, not like a tsar who is appoint to all elements of an issue.
 
Jarod said:
Haha! He was specifically trying to tie illegal immigration to what happened in NO, and several here fell for it. Open your eyes!
Click to expand...
Nah. I think you want to believe that, so you will. Because what Jarod wants is what Jarod does. You are the person I think of when I think of the person that would vote for the "Saw" dummy on his tricycle if he was running for office as a Democrat, it pervades your every thought. He didn't tie illegal immigration to what happened in LA, he tied the albatross of partisan reporting around the neck of the mainstream press. Again. Like he always does. Using an example and citing how things were reported. It doesn't say, "That guy is an illegal" any more than any poster here did. You can cite no example, because there aren't any.

Words have value, especially to one who argues for a living. In this matter, yours have none.
 
Jarod said:
She was appointed to work on very specific parts of the challenge…. Can you tell us what those were? They were limited to specific parts, not like a tsar who is appoint to all elements of an issue.
Click to expand...
Okay, what did she do on those parts and how successful was she at them?
 
Damocles said:
Never before in history has it given less reassurance to the United States Citizens when the government said or says, "The FBI is in charge of this investigation."

Well, maybe saying the Secret Service is in charge of a drug investigation in the WH would give less reassurance, but not much less.
Click to expand...
Well, you'll be happy when the DOGE whittles the FBI down to a few office jockeys doing background checks on government workers....at least until the next major 9/11-style terrorist attack. LOL
 
Damocles said:
Nah. I think you want to believe that, so you will. Because what Jarod wants is what Jarod does. You are the person I think of when I think of the person that would vote for the "Saw" dummy on his tricycle if he was running for office as a Democrat, it pervades your every thought. He didn't tie illegal immigration to what happened in LA, he tied the albatross of partisan reporting around the neck of the mainstream press. Again. Like he always does. Using an example and citing how things were reported. It doesn't say, "That guy is an illegal" any more than any poster here did. You can cite no example, because there aren't any.

Words have value, especially to one who argues for a living. In this matter, yours have none.
Click to expand...
Post #4 is where the Orange Oaf conflates two subjects in order to push his border wall /anti-immigrant BS. That dog just won't fly https://www.justplainpolitics.com/t...o-crowd-on-bourbon-street.226342/post-6290536

Deal with it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top