Dutch Uncle
* Tertia Optio * Defend the Constitution
QED on Fredo’s evilness. Sad.so you're two faced.
ok. so like a luciferian.
QED on Fredo’s evilness. Sad.so you're two faced.
ok. so like a luciferian.
Catholics espouse beliefs that are not actually in the bible.You haven't shown how its not. For 1500 years the solas didn't exist. No one saw them in the Bible no one taught them but suddenly they appear. It ironic to hear supposed "bible believing" Christians espousing beliefs that arent in the Bible. If that's not "perverted" what is it?
Correct. Christianity was Catholic, hence the name, and Catholic was Christianity. There was no distinction.
Yes. Catholics dont believe in sola scriptura. Nothing the church believes contradicts scripture. Sola scriptura isnt a rule.Catholics espouse beliefs that are not actually in the bible.
That's what bugged Luther. He thought if it wasn't in the bible, it wasn't correct religious belief.
The Catholics believe that church teachings and ecclesiastical authority have the same authority as biblical scripture. The seven sacraments are a specific Catholic belief, even though Luther and Calvin would say most of those sacraments are not found in the bible
Catholic doesn't mean Christian. Catholic is a Latin word for universal, because the church led by the Bishop of Rome considered itself the universal church.
I think it was smelled.I saw no piss and vinegar.
I just showed you that the Catholic church has practices and beliefs that aren't specifically in the bible, so you can't pin it on Protestants as deviating from "true" Christianity.Yes. Catholics dont believe in sola scriptura. Nothing the church believes contradicts scripture. Sola scriptura isnt a rule.
Right. That's a perversion of scripture. Lots of people even in the time time of Jesus were "bugged" by what Jesus taught. Those are just two more.
Everyone of them is.
Correct Catholic means universal. For 1500 years what is not called Catholicism was Christianity. There was no perversion. The beliefs were universal.
Holy Rollers and Militant Atheists seem to believe one has to pick a team, and either attack Christianity or defend Christianity relentlessly and without exception.In quoted posts above and also here:
You, Yak and the other White Supremacists keep insisting that only your views are correct. Claiming Cypress is doing same is both projection and BS since that’s not what he’s saying.
Agreed on pick a team but since none of them act like Christians, I’m guessing it’s not Team Christian.Holy Rollers and Militant Atheists seem to believe one has to pick a team, and either attack Christianity or defend Christianity relentlessly and without exception.
They are both very dogmatic.
That is mental slavery. I like to think for myself and judge the evidence independently.
You don't get to speak for Jesus, Sybil.^^^
Perverts the words of Jesus. Sad.
You are hallucinating again, Sybil.A group which you are not “in” due to your behavior and the hatred in your heart, Fredo.
You don't get to speak for God, Sybil. MAGA is not a person.Agreed on pick a team but since none of them act like Christians, I’m guessing it’s not Team Christian.
They are following the MAGAt rules. Sad.
Agreed on mental slavery, but it’s to the ideas of hatred, bigotry and ignorance. Which might explain why God didn’t just imprint the evidence on our brains.
You don't get to speak for Jesus, Sybil.
You are hallucinating again, Sybil.
^^^You don't get to speak for God, Sybil. MAGA is not a person.
Yes. Catholics dont believe in sola scriptura. Nothing the church believes contradicts scripture. Sola scriptura isnt a rule.
Right. That's a perversion of scripture. Lots of people even in the time time of Jesus were "bugged" by what Jesus taught. Those are just two more.
Everyone of them is.
Correct Catholic means universal. For 1500 years what is not called Catholicism was Christianity. There was no perversion. The beliefs were universal.
and yet you've chosen them as somehow "the best form of Christianity" apparently, for not following "sola scriptura", in this small argument here.I just showed you that the Catholic church has practices and beliefs that aren't specifically in the bible, so you can't pin it on Protestants as deviating from "true" Christianity.
Sure, the Bishop of Rome and his Roman Catholic church liked to think of themselves as the universal church. But the fact is, even back in antiquity there was a Coptic Church, a Syriac Church, an Ethiopian Orthodox church. Not to mention Nestorian Christians who continued to exist in Persia and Central Asia.
So Roman Catholicism wasn't, and never was, the only game in town, though they liked to think they were.
That's a good point. I don't think there are many genuine christians or impartial atheists here.Agreed on pick a team but since none of them act like Christians, I’m guessing it’s not Team Christian.
They are following the MAGAt rules. Sad.
Agreed on mental slavery, but it’s to the ideas of hatred, bigotry and ignorance. Which might explain why God didn’t just imprint the evidence on our brains.
You obviously missed or ignored what I said was admirable about Protestantism in principle.and yet you've chosen them as somehow "the best form of Christianity" apparently, for not following "sola scriptura", in this small argument here.
so what is the catholic teaching on the role of the pharisees in the persecution of Jesus, Mr. know it all?
or is all this just distracting bullshit with no relevancy to the actual discussion?
but I'm asking you what Catholics teach about the role of the pharisees in jesus's persecution.You obviously missed or ignored what I said was admirable about Protestantism in principle.
all the atheist scholars......any serious comments to add?.....many scholars to be pseudepigraphical (ie Peter didn't write it).
interesting.......are you of the mind that only his maternal genealogy is relevant or is it the paternal that you favor......most people are smart enough to realize people have both.....Too bad God couldn't decide on which genealogy his only begotten son had.
the apocrypha are not considered to be books of the OT.......they are the apocryphal books.......The number of books in the OT is different for Catholics than it is for Protestants. So sorry you don't know anything about the Bible.
So either learn about the Bible or stop mischaracterizing it because you have never read it.
why put your own interpretation into what Luke wrote?........it isn't necessary for you to interpret his words to exclude God......Why does the introduction to Gospel of Luke say that Luke takes full ownership of writing the gospel, and to my knowledge there is no indication God is sitting next to him dictating what to write
there is a difference between catholic and Roman Catholic Church.......You haven't shown how its not. For 1500 years the solas didn't exist. No one saw them in the Bible no one taught them but suddenly they appear. It ironic to hear supposed "bible believing" Christians espousing beliefs that arent in the Bible. If that's not "perverted" what is it?
Correct. Christianity was Catholic, hence the name, and Catholic was Christianity. There was no distinction.