Into the Night
Verified User
Perhaps you should read Acts.Then clearly you don't know how Paul "met" Jesus.
Perhaps you should read Acts.Then clearly you don't know how Paul "met" Jesus.
There is no such thing as a 'militant atheist'. Atheists don't care whether a god or gods exist or not.Militant atheists believe the NT is a pack of lies and deceptions.
It is YOU being the fundamentalist here, Sybil. You cannot blame your problem on anybody else.I am in the middle between unyielding fundamentalism and strident atheism. I don't think semitic people of the ancient Near East even knew how to write analytical history, biography, journalism. Those are inventions of the Greeks, Romans, and Enlightenment era Europeans. I think NT is a mixture of parable, allegory, embellishments, myth, and events, sermons, and activities some of which are based on real people and events.
Perhaps you should read Acts.
I'm content to let others decide for themselves, Perry.I didn't run from it. It still stands.
Indeed. Believers dying for a fiction they truly believe. Tale as old as time.
Nothing ever is for you guys.
Martyrs are martyrs.
That's right, Sybil. I claim to be a Christian. What was your first clue?^^^
Claims to be a Christian.
masons always have to be the experts on religion, so they can lie about it.I never said there was a coordinated conspiracy. Those are your words.
The NT are stories. Nothing more. Nothing less. In those stories are additions and subtractions. One could call the additions embellishments or fabrications is your choice. At the tomb, was it an angel or a young man?
I also never said all the disciples were dead. And yeah, Paul HEARD the stories. So, which of the several renditions is correct?
Your posts claiming to be a Christian, but your behavior never matches your claims.That's right, Sybil. I claim to be a Christian. What was your first clue?
I'm content to let others decide for themselves, Perry.
Go read Acts. RQAA.Then you'll show me where Paul physically met Jesus in Acts.
Go ahead. Just show me the verse.
You're free to claim all the fantasies you like, Perry. Are you still standing by your claim to have a PhD in GeoChem?As you should. My original critique of "but they died for the stories!" still stands.
Go read Acts. RQAA.
You're free to claim all the fantasies you like, Perry. Are you still standing by your claim to have a PhD in GeoChem?
^^^Go read Acts. RQAA.
^^^Stick to the topic if possible.
This is Cypress standard "strawman". He will continue to lie about your position and mischaracterize it.
He is incapable of discussing a topic without attacking the other poster. (Unless it's Doc Douche....then he will trade stories about how smart he is)
^^^
Demands others to stick to the topic but doesn't hold himself to the same standard. Since you ran from the question, the answer is obvious.
I never really fundamentally understood that whole redemptive aspect of his death the theology claims, but I also think it is nearly impossible to put my 21st century mind in the shoes of first century Jews.The question is, why do people need to believe someone can die and come back to life.
Easy. They lied. And they thought others were stupid.I never really fundamentally understood that whole redemptive aspect of his death theology claims, but I also think it is nearly impossible to put my 21st century mind in the shoes of first century Jews.
I never really fundamentally understood that whole redemptive aspect of his death the theology claims, but I also think it is nearly impossible to put my 21st century mind in the shoes of first century Jews.
that's how atheists are almost exactly like holy rollers in some ways. They have absolute certainty in their truth claims.Easy. They lied. And they thought others were stupid.
Cut the holy rollers shit. It's childish and tiresome.that's how atheists are almost exactly like holy rollers in some ways. They have absolute certainty in their truth claims.
Possibly there was a coordinated conspiracy to produce writings that were nothing but lies and deceptions.
I don't claim it as a fact. There is always a possibility of rational alternative explanations