BartenderElite
Verified User
Yeah. Poor white people.
Average IQ in Somalia is 67
- Thread starter Text Drivers are Killers
- Start date
Yeah. Poor white people.
Jake Starkey
Verified User
"All the white people [are not]... the villains."
You write as if you have an IQ of 67.
Tobytone
Verified User
In case your smooth brain hasn’t figured it out yet, he said it because he’s a drooling, sheet-wearing, sister-fucking racist. Obvious to anyone with more than three functioning brain cells. Just glance at his “signature.' From the arguments I’ve had with this mouth-breather, his IQ is barely scraping double digits on a good day, and that’s after he’s had his morning glue-huffing session.
He’s the poster child for why some gene pools need a lifeguard, a slack-jawed, knuckle-dragging, inbred trailer park champion who gathers with the rest of the dim-bulb, meth-gargling cousin-humpers every weekend to whine about how all their problems (like the sky-high rate of flipper-babies their toothless, Walmart-shoplifting, sister-wives keep squeezing out) are somehow the fault of people with more than one shade darker than expired mayonnaise.
The only difference between libtard racism and this swamp-donkey’s brand is that he’s too stupid to even pretend he’s not a racist. He proudly wears it like a semen-stained wifebeater and just grunts it out loud while scratching his neckbeard and wondering why his cousin-girlfriend left him for his half-brother.
Tobytone
Verified User
Only a complete window-licking moron looks at some unsourced, decade-old 'data' collected during a civil war by God-knows-who using God-knows-what broken test on starving, illiterate refugees and thinks, 'Yep, this totally proves an entire nation of millions is literally retarded.” You might as well stroll into whatever toothless, meth-ravaged trailer park this OP crawled out of, hand out IQ tests between incest sessions, average the results, and announce 'BREAKING: White Americans are dumber than a sack of bricks.'
Same fraudulent methodology, same inbred audience, same room-temperature IQ proudly on display. Congrats to anyone believing this garbage on getting owned by the dumbest psy-op on the internet. Anyone is dumb as the guy posting this thread only needs to look up what a 67 IQ actually means. An IQ of 67 or lower was defined as mental retardation before we got woke now it's called intellectually disabled.
Same fraudulent methodology, same inbred audience, same room-temperature IQ proudly on display. Congrats to anyone believing this garbage on getting owned by the dumbest psy-op on the internet. Anyone is dumb as the guy posting this thread only needs to look up what a 67 IQ actually means. An IQ of 67 or lower was defined as mental retardation before we got woke now it's called intellectually disabled.
Jake Starkey
Verified User
Wow. The last several days has witnessed the meltdown of some loons on the opposite sides of the same coin.
volsrocks
Verified User
Not accusing them
Its documented
Average IQ by Country 2025
Interesting data on the average IQ by country, offering insights into the average intelligence levels of populations through various tests and sources.
Average IQ by Country (2025 Report) - Platform Participant Data
Take the official AVSEO IQ Test online. Get your IQ score instantly with our standardized assessment, trusted worldwide. Explore global IQ statistics and compare results.
www.iq-international-test.com
Text Drivers are Killers
Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
HAHAHA. Another lefty who supports affirmative action and then calls other people racist.
Text Drivers are Killers
Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
Like japan , China is not mutiracial. It's great when a country is like that.
Jake Starkey
Verified User
You gaslight yourself. You would fit right into Iraq.
Affirmative Action is the opposite of racism.
volsrocks
Verified User
To assume that one person is better able to provide diversity than another solely on the basis of their race is the very definition of racism, is it not?
Any systematic favoritism of one group over another based on some ‘identity’ standard, rather than objective merit, is discrimination against those not receiving the favorable treatment.
I kinda like America as a melting pot, multicultural nation, with lots of variety in music, food, language, and a strong, healthy, genetic makeup, due to many people having multiple genetic backgrounds.
I personally am German, German-Jew, Irish, Norwegian, and English. My Wife is Spanish, Native American, Mexican, French Native American, French Canadian and possibly Asian (Chinese).
My daughters are all that mix. My grand kids add in new lines of Irish, German, Italian, Norwegian.
Because of the large mix, we have good health, high IQs, and strong immune systems.
I am a firm believer in Mutts are better, and thoroughbreds are often inbred.
-
Last edited:
Any policy that explicitly uses a person’s race as a criterion for granting or denying benefits, opportunities, or penalties is engaging in racial discrimination, full stop. The moment race becomes a plus factor (or a minus factor) in decision-making, you have crossed the line into racism, regardless of whether the stated intent is to ‘correct historical wrongs,’ ‘promote diversity,’ or ‘level the playing field.’
Intent does not negate the act. A fireman who burns down a building to ‘save’ the people inside is still guilty of arson. Calling it ‘affirmative action’ or ‘equity’ is just a euphemism that changes the packaging but not the contents: treating individuals differently, and often worse, because of their race. That is the textbook definition of racism.
If the goal is truly to help the disadvantaged, we already have race-neutral tools that work better and don’t violate the principle of equal treatment: income-based aid, zip-code targeting, first-generation college status, overcoming adversity essays, etc. The fact that advocates almost never accept these race-neutral alternatives as sufficient is the clearest evidence that the policy isn’t about helping the disadvantaged, it’s about engineering racial outcomes. And engineering outcomes by race is racism with extra steps.
You need an update
What Is an Affirmative Action Plan and Who Needs One?
Explore the framework for fostering workplace equity. Understand the structure and application of proactive employment initiatives.
legalclarity.org
From your own link the racial portions:You need an update
What Is an Affirmative Action Plan and Who Needs One?
Explore the framework for fostering workplace equity. Understand the structure and application of proactive employment initiatives.
Workforce Analysis: Breaks down the workforce by job group, race, ethnicity, and gender, categorizing positions based on similar responsibilities and wage rates.
Availability Analysis: Determines the availability of qualified minorities and women in the relevant recruiting areas, using data such as US Census information. This analysis establishes a benchmark against which the current workforce is compared.
Comparison of Incumbency to Availability: Identifies job groups where the percentage of minorities or women employed is less than would reasonably be expected given their availability.
Placement Goals: When underutilization is identified, these measurable objectives are established to address disparities, serving as targets to guide affirmative action efforts. Placement goals are not quotas but flexible objectives to be achieved through good faith efforts.
Action-Oriented Programs: Outline specific steps the contractor will take to achieve these goals, such as targeted recruitment or training initiatives.
Internal Audit and Reporting System: Established to monitor progress, measure the effectiveness of the AAP, and ensure ongoing compliance.
When you use race to create "goals" for hiring you are falling foul of what I last posted. No matter how much you say you are doing it to "benefit <insert minority>" you are still providing goals based on "race".
The reality is, saying "it isn't a quota" doesn't change that it is still giving benefits to a "race" over other factors that could be used to determine need. I gave you some of those factors... but instead you just rinse and repeat.
No matter how many times you excuse it, if you use "minority status" to create your goals, however flexible, you are using racially charged and racist criteria.
The Somalis are not always, but often, inbred, somewhat like some populations of the American Ozarks.
The Pakistani's are sometimes, not always, badly inbred.
Scientifically, the most inbred population on earth, by a wide margin, is the Gaza Palestinians. Inbreeding is a huge problem throughout all of the Muslim Nations, and the more Sharia Law, the worse.
Even the Saudi Royal family has admitted the problems of inbreeding in their family, much like many of the blue-bloods of Europe.
Thank the Gods for the new blood of Princess Diana.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
worldpopulationreview.com
The Pakistani's are sometimes, not always, badly inbred.
Scientifically, the most inbred population on earth, by a wide margin, is the Gaza Palestinians. Inbreeding is a huge problem throughout all of the Muslim Nations, and the more Sharia Law, the worse.
Even the Saudi Royal family has admitted the problems of inbreeding in their family, much like many of the blue-bloods of Europe.
Thank the Gods for the new blood of Princess Diana.
Prevalence of Consanguineous Marriage among Saudi Citizens of Albaha, a Cross-Sectional Study - PMC
Consanguineous marriage (CM) is a prevalent kind of relationship in Muslim and Arab countries, and this type of relationship is linked to several health risks. This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of (CM), its associated hereditary ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Inbreeding by Country 2025
Data on the frequency of inbreeding/consanguinuity by country, including countries where inbreeding is common, countries in which inbreeding is uncommon, and the country with the highest rate of inbreeding in the world.
Jake Starkey
Verified User
So people want their own definitions. Nothing new there.
