I don't know why religious people object to this.Commonsense dictates that religion is an invention of men.
I don't know why religious people object to this.Commonsense dictates that religion is an invention of men.
I don't know why religious people object to this.
????????????I don't know why religious people object to this.
Have not considered this. Maybe agnosticism is a religion. I wonder what sociologist think about that.
Theists and atheists are essentially the same thing...people making blind guesses about an essential of the REALITY of existence.So, theists and agnostics like talking about religion. Atheists do not. There is the difference.
Horseshit. Atheists like talking about religion just as much as agnostics...except that they think their blind guesses are better than the blind guesses of the theists.So, theists and agnostics like talking about religion. Atheists do not. There is the difference.
Atheists attempt to desparage agnostics...probably because deep down inside they realize the agnostic viewpoint makes more sense than the atheistic one.An agnostic is like someone who is seen going into a bar every weekend.
When asked, he says he does not like drinking alcohol.
Then why go to a bar?
Atheism is a religion, but Agnosticism is simply "I don't know. Go pester someone else".Have not considered this. Maybe agnosticism is a religion. I wonder what sociologist think about that.
LOL They also try to include Buddhists. It's as silly as gun-banners including suicides in their "gun violence" numbers.Atheists attempt to desparage agnostics...probably because deep down inside they realize the agnostic viewpoint makes more sense than the atheistic one.
Many atheists also try to include agnostics in their folds...to increase their numbers and increase the average intelligence of the group.
"wouldn't consider themselves agnostic about OTHER unevidenced claims. 'Thanks for the confirmation.
Like I said, I'm A-OK with people being agnostic about God, but generally I find that people apply agnosticism very SPECIFICALLY and ONLY to God. When in reality they consistently in their lives wouldn't consider themselves agnostic about OTHER unevidenced claims.
I think an "ideal" would be to have a philosophy which is consistently applied across all cases. But that's not easy to do.
I didn't say anything about a god. I said that my blind guess is that there is at least one god.
The only attributes I assigned were that IT (or they) is/are responsible for the creation of what we humans call 'the physical universe'...IF SUCH AN ENTITY OR ENTITIES ACTUALLY
For me, it’s not a matter of faith. It’s a matter of evidence. And I see zero evidence of the Christian concept of their god.Agreed on blind guess. It's a matter of faith for both groups.
Some atheists, Biblical scholars for instance, make it their living and are passionate about it. There are atheists who left their evangelical past that wish to frequently talk about it. Maybe constantly.So, theists and agnostics like talking about religion. Atheists do not. There is the difference.
Talk about hate speech!Some atheists, Biblical scholars for instance, make it their living and passion.
Personally, I find ancient archeology and the origins of man and his religions pretty fascinating.