Well, it's hard to give an all encompasing definition, but I'd start with when the bottom lines (S&P 500 and DOW) in the below chart grow at a pace dramatically different from the top line of the chart (corporate profits):
Bad form Fed
- Thread starter Cancel 2016.2
- Start date
Well, it's hard to give an all encompasing definition, but I'd start with when the bottom lines (S&P 500 and DOW) in the below chart grow at a pace dramatically different from the top line of the chart (corporate profits):
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Well, it's hard to give an all encompasing definition, but I'd start with when the bottom lines (S&P 500 and DOW) in the below chart grow at a pace dramatically different from the top line of the chart (corporate profits):
ROFLMAO... so corporate profits are doing exceedingly well, yet Dung wants the Fed to keep blowing up the bubble... great plan Dung.
There is no stock market bubble.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Which is why it contracts every time they mention cutting the 'stimulus'???
Annie
Not So Junior Member
Meaning QE, which everyone seems loathe to acknowledge. Hmmm, could there be a reason for that reticence?
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
Seriously credibility with whom? Most people don't even know what QE is which is why they call it quantitative easing. It is to keep mindless rubes like Dunhheap and Desh ignorant to what is really going on.
If anyone can point me to a time in history where a country debasing its currency turned out well for its citizens, I am all eyes. Maybe Desh can consult Wi
canceled.2021.1
#AMERICAISDEAD
you obviously don't know what you are talking about. the stock market is supposed to discount the future and that means the economy. Based on the Feds actions and statements that the future of the economy is weak, the stock market should theoretically go down. Why doesn't it? Because the fed is keeping interest rates artificially low (although they have been climbing ssshhhh don't tell anyone).
This party cannot last forever. BernanQE is not the the all knowing purveyor of our economy and nor should he be.
It is amazing how liberals like you will decry Wall St and all its evils as well as the Bankstas, yet you turn around and put blind faith in Wall St guys like BernanQE who has only bolstered the balance sheets of his Banksta buddies while stealing the savings of hard working Americans.
Your stupidity indicates to me that you are auditioning for a spot as an MSNBC host
Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
How about we add the 10-15 billion rather than subtract it, and see what happens. 
I cannot imagine a dumber policy. But then, we are in the decade of dumb. Look who we, the sheeple, elected.
Printing money for bankers has never been a good thing.
I'm curious about your claims; what has quantitative easing and extremely low interest rates done for the economy over the last two years? Job creation is pretty much non-existent, real unemployment is over 13% and job participation has dropped by 1.3 million workers.
The only part of the economy that appears to be booming is the stock market and wall streetcars you brain dead liberals love to hate; yet you support this nonsense?
Why is it the forums most prolific lying asshat has to keep repeating the same lies over and over again. I lectured you on another thread about what caused the mortgage bubble that imploded, many of the same policies currently being pursued, and yet you moronically continue to parrot your inane hyper partisan blame Bush lines.
You're either really that stupid, or mentally retarded. I am beginning to think it is he latter.
Dismissed vulgar asshat.