I thought everyone wanted new infrastructure. And here they are, championing Obama for crushing new infrastructure because the CURRENT infrastructure is bad.
how about a new infrastructure that is not hazardous to our environment?
I thought everyone wanted new infrastructure. And here they are, championing Obama for crushing new infrastructure because the CURRENT infrastructure is bad.
and when, not if it fails, tar sand oil is also rather corrosive compared to crude oil
how about a new infrastructure that is not hazardous to our environment?
how about a new infrastructure that is not hazardous to our environment?
lol... so because eventually (which can be anywhere from tomorrow-100 years in the future) it will have an accident, we shouldn't build it?
Planes eventually have accidents. So do auto's. So do buildings. Etc... nothing is meant to last forever. It is blatantly silly to pretend that because things eventually break down, we shouldn't build them to begin with.
Shouldn't have children either, they're just gonna die.
So....nothing? Everything is damaging to the environment or potentially so. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
yet most of the same people that oppose pipelines want to build high speed trains... wonder what those will do to local wildlife? Did they not just post about a train wreck in this thread? What happens when that train derails?
Or wind farms. Ever see how wind farms fuck up birds and migration patterns? Not to mention the environmental cost of all the materials involved...
Or wind farms. Ever see how wind farms fuck up birds and migration patterns? Not to mention the environmental cost of all the materials involved...
Yes
1) Nothing is safe to the environment FOREVER, it has to be maintained
Yes
2) It does bring benefit to the US
3) It does create sustainable jobs at the US refineries in TX
4) Even if it were just temporary jobs, they would be temporary jobs at a time we desperately need jobs.
5) Almost all infrastructure development jobs are temporary...
If the Pegasus pipeline wasn't maintained what guarantee do we have Keystone will be?
Cite?
lol... so because eventually (which can be anywhere from tomorrow-100 years in the future) it will have an accident, we shouldn't build it?
Planes eventually have accidents. So do auto's. So do buildings. Etc... nothing is meant to last forever. It is blatantly silly to pretend that because things eventually break down, we shouldn't build them to begin with.
Yes
1) Nothing is safe to the environment FOREVER, it has to be maintained
2) It does bring benefit to the US
3) It does create sustainable jobs at the US refineries in TX
4) Even if it were just temporary jobs, they would be temporary jobs at a time we desperately need jobs.
5) Almost all infrastructure development jobs are temporary...
Well gee Howey, we have no guarantee that any of our infrastructure will be maintained. Pegasus was over 60 years old. Saying 'it wasn't maintained' is a bit of a stretch. There is only so much you can do to keep something together... eventually it has to be replaced. You know... like by building a new pipeline?
Common sense.
1) Benefits to the US... revenues to the states for the pipelines, revenue to the refineries in TX, jobs at the refineries, jobs maintaining the pipelines
2) Jobs at the refineries are a given... the oil does not refine itself
3) Unemployment is still above 7.5%... so we do desperately need jobs, even if they only last a few years (in reality those are the perfect jobs for this environment)
4) Once a bridge/road etc... is built, the crews don't continue working on those projects... because they are done.
in this case i think it will be sooner rather than later unless the pipe is coated with something to offset the corrosiveness of the 'oil'
so jobs at any cost, i this is so, then why does not congress pass a jobs bill
oil companies have a bad reputation regarding maintenance of pipelines, come to think of it, they have a bad reputation period...their motto is 'trust us'
as for 1940's pipeline, maybe they built them better then, but documentation have you?
how can you cite common sense when it is so rare and profits so important...it is the bottom line each quarter that gives CEO's the big bucks