Balancing the Supreme Court

[Nordberg]

what's the risk reward of illegal voting, nonce?

. It is a class 4 felony in most states A class 5 in some others. That is 1 to 10 years in jail and a 12,500 fine.

 

[Nordberg]

I read a long article suggesting making the court with 25 judges. That takes a lot of pressure off each judge. It ends the crazy senate hearings and questioning. Judges will die and be replaced regularly and it will not be such a big deal.

 

[Nordberg]

A "balanced" court is another one of these leftist fabrications like "social" justice, "unconscious" racism, "micro" aggressions, "safe spaces". Just more tired old made up shit by leftist cockroaches.

No. The courts are not supposed to be political., That was always the attempt. Senators voted for opposite party judges if they were qualified, The judges actually answered the senator's questions too. Now the Repubs have made it 100 percent political. It is called winning.

 

[Yakuda]

No. The courts are not supposed to be political., That was always the attempt. Senators voted for opposite party judges if they were qualified, The judges actually answered the senator's questions too. Now the Repubs have made it 100 percent political. It is called winning.

Did a single retarded leftist democrat vote to confirm Barrett? She was already a judge so there is no reason to believe she wouldn't be appropriate for the Supreme Court. Tell us why she shouldn't be a SC justice. If you ever actually get the balls to answer I bet any reason you give will be political. I am sick and tired of you fucking cockroaches pretending to be do fucking righteous. Go fuck your mother.

BTW you fucking moron 3 democrats vote to approve barrett for her court of appeals job so there is no reason to believe barrett shouldn't have been a easy approval to the SC but you shit eating fuckers voted strict party line. You leftist cockroaches are less than human.

 

[Truck Fump / h1b]

. It is a class 4 felony in most states A class 5 in some others. That is 1 to 10 years in jail and a 12,500 fine.

so because there's a law there's no voter fraud.

 

[CFM]

Nonsense. It is a solution looking for a problem. The risk/reward of illegal voting is more than sufficient to prevent fraud. Evidence of that is the fact that there isn't any. Can you get through a single post without namecalling? Or is that what you use in place of intelligence?

You mean like the risk/reward for stealing is sufficient enough to prevent stealing?

 

[CFM]

so because there's a law there's no voter fraud.

He's the kind that would claim he never speeds because a sign that states a limit.

 

[Grokmaster]

Simple. Merritt Garland was legitimately nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court, but the Senate failed to even consider his nomination. In order to correct that, a seat should be added to the Supreme Court and Garland should be considered by the Senate for that open seat, or the person who filled that seat should be removed from the court. Since there is no reason to remove Gorsuch, we'll just have to add one more extra seat that will be appointed by President Biden. Done. No court packing necessary. The balance is restored, conservatives still have a 6-5 majority (it should actually be 5-4 at this point).

Senate majority leader Chuck Schumer should make this happen.

Discuss.

OH...SO THAT'S WHAT YOU LYING ASSHOLES ARE CALLING "STACKING THE COURT" NOW , WHILE DECLARING FILLING VACANCIES AS "STACKING THE COURT".


INTELLIGENT AMERICANS LAUGH AT YOU MORONS...