Ballroom Derangement Syndrome Now Besets the Pathetic Left

[Earl]

I don’t care specifically that a ballroom is being built…

1) I care that this was done without consultation with Congress.

2) That Trump lied about the destruction of the East wing.

3) That there is a lack of transparency as to who is paying, and what they are getting by doing so.

Are you drunk?


https://x.com/i/grok/share/yU2kHswWyYYSqsAFPh3RR6F5T

https://x.com/i/grok/share/bWQkZS7qYPWO8zM7UkGkxaMIe

 

[Earl]

“Is criminality now the bar for presidential behavior?”

This is truly ironic…truly!

 

[Damocles]

1. Not sure that is true, it looks like they usually do.

2. Not a crime, still not ok w me. Is criminality now the bar for presidential behavior?

3. The “list” is incomplete and likely a lie, and, why they donated (if they did) is my question. What are these corporations, with a fiduciary duty to stockholders, getting in exchange? Were they threatened or bullied?

1. Ask grok... They do not.
2. Do not care if it is "okay with you"...
3. You just saying stuff doesn't make it true.

 

[Jarod]

Are you drunk?

https://x.com/i/grok/share/yU2kHswWyYYSqsAFPh3RR6F5T

https://x.com/i/grok/share/bWQkZS7qYPWO8zM7UkGkxaMIe

1) Elon Musk’s AI?
2) How does it disprove my comments?
3) AI is not a source.
4) not drunk, are you?

 

[Jarod]

1. Ask grok... They do not.
2. Do not care if it is "okay with you"...
3. You just saying stuff doesn't make it true.

1) grok is not a citation, I know Obama did.
2) not my point.
3) and Trump saying stuff makes it less likely to be true.

 

[Jarod]

1. Ask grok... They do not.
2. Do not care if it is "okay with you"...
3. You just saying stuff doesn't make it true.

Is lack of criminality your standard for what you expect for presidential behavior?

 

[Earl]

1) Elon Musk’s AI?
2) How does it disprove my comments?
3) AI is not a source.
4) not drunk, are you?

This disproves your comment:

Your post:
“3) “That there is a lack of transparency as to who is paying, and what they are getting by doing so.”

There is a list of those that donated that I posted and if you can refute it, refute it.

 

[TOP]

The renderings that make no sense? That has a staircase leading nowhere? That the interior doesn't match the exterior? The interior shows 5 windows facing west and the exterior facing east shows 6 windows.

Not only that, the WH website lists the cost at $200 million. I wonder what that other $100 million is for.

It's going to be awesome...and I have another great idea...

 

[Jarod]

This disproves your comment:

Your post:
“3) “That there is a lack of transparency as to who is paying, and what they are getting by doing so.”

There is a list that I posted and if you can refute it, refute it.

Is the list complete? Your list is not a valid source. Tge money does not add up to the total amount needed.

 

[Earl]

Is the list complete? Your list is not a valid source. Tge money does not add up to the total amount needed.

The list is at the discretion of the president.

If you don’t like his list, complain to the White House.

You are truly floundering.

use-ball...

Meet all 37 White House ballroom donors funding the $300 million build, including Silicon Valley tech giants, crypto bros and the Lutnicks​

Meet all 37 White House ballroom donors funding the $300 million build, including Silicon Valley tech giants, crypto bros and the Lutnicks | Fortune

The list, reviewed by Fortune, did not mention specific dollar amounts offered by each contributor.

fortune.com

4 hours ago — Meet all 37 White House ballroom donors funding the $300 million build, including Silicon Valley tech giants, crypto bros and the Lutnicks.

This is the last time I am going to do your research for you.

How in Hell did you get a receptionist’s job?

 

[Phantasmal]

The real reason the leftists hate the idea of Trump building something that will be part of history for a long time to come is because they know that for decades and decades we'll be talking about the Trump Ballroom.

As the definitive experts of Large Balls would say:

I've got big balls, I've got big balls
They're such big balls, and they're dirty big balls
And he's got big balls and she's got big balls
But we've got the biggest balls of them all

He tore down a historical building without going through proper channels. This is the problem.

It wasn’t his East Wing. It belonged to “We the People”.

 

[Jarod]

This disproves your comment:

Your post:
“3) “That there is a lack of transparency as to who is paying, and what they are getting by doing so.”

There is a list of those that donated that I posted and if you can refute it, refute it.

Not a full list, no source.

Refute that!

 

[Jarod]

He tore down a historical building without going through proper channels. This is the problem.

It wasn’t his East Wing. It belonged to “We the People”.

But it’s ok w Damocles, because it’s not criminal.

 

[Phantasmal]

But it’s ok w Damocles, because it’s not criminal.

He’d have a different position if Biden had done it.

 

[Earl]

Not a full list, no source.

Refute that!

Have a child read post no. 270 and explain it to you.

 

[Jarod]

He’d have a different position if Biden had done it.

No shit!

 

[Diogenes]

There may not be a “requirement” that Congress be consulted, that doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be done.

In your opinion.

Nobody has said who is “donating” money or how much, or what threats were made to get them to “donate” that money.

Is that so?

 

[Earl]

He’d have a different position if Biden had done it.

The vegetable did not even know where he was.

 

[Diogenes]

No shit!

Speculation.

 

[Jarod]

Have a child read post no. 270 and explain it to you.

What are they getting for having donated to Trumps pet project?