Looks like Steve Ferguson needs to read the Constitution.
The methodology has changed several times but mostly on how to categorize race and ethnicity.Congress could pass laws adding questions (e.g., about citizenship status) or improving data collection, as long as they don't interfere with the full enumeration. (A citizenship question was blocked for 2020 on administrative grounds, not constitutionality.)
The methodology has changed several times but mostly on how to categorize race and ethnicity.

Many of these people work and pay some taxes. They contribute to society so why shouldn't they be counted?No reason why citizenship shouldn't or couldn't be added . . . unless![]()
Many of these people work and pay some taxes.
They contribute to society so why shouldn't they be counted?
The biggest one is sales tax. I don't know of anyone who can get away with not paying it.How many? How much do they pay?
You don't know, because all anyone has are "estimates" that vary wildly. We don't even know how many foreigners are in the country.
I don't recall saying they shouldn't be counted. I want them counted - as non-citizens.
The biggest one is sales tax. I don't know of anyone who can get away with not paying it.
I never said I knew how much they paid, just that they did. You're arguing for the sake of arguing.Quit dodging.
You don't know, because all anyone has are "estimates" that vary wildly. We don't even know how many foreigners are in the country.
I never said I knew how much they paid, just that they did. You're arguing for the sake of arguing.
You said don't know either. Is it fair if someone pays into social security but will never be able to collect it?So, you say they work and pay taxes, but can't even say how many there are, or how much (or how little) they "contribute".
So much for "everyone must pay their fair share", huh?
Is it fair if someone pays into social security but will never be able to collect it?