christiefan915
Catalyst
Doesn't your universal generalization include ME?
I love it when you deflect like this. I'm still collecting examples, though.
Doesn't your universal generalization include ME?
If I had specifically referred to you, you'd have a point. But I didn't, so you don't.
I can also add that cons thought Rmoney would win in a landslide.
Doesn't your universal generalization include ME?
If I had specifically referred to you, you'd have a point. But I didn't, so you don't.
I can also add that cons thought Rmoney would win in a landslide.
My claims are proven, and verifiable. You have offered no evidence, except "there is no way Trump could have lost."
What of your claims is verifiable?
Trump is up by 200K votes in Penn with 97% of the vote in..
All of a sudden the big "Stop Count" yet totes of ballots are trucked in from everywhere.
Next thing you know 2 weeks or so later, Biden wins!
Doesn't your universal generalization include ME?
Must have been a miracle.
Remember all the posts and threads you started, where you were sure the Arizona Cyber ninjas recount would expose the Kraken and sink Biden?
You can run, but you can't hide.
What of your claims is verifiable?
Trump is up by 200K votes in Penn with 97% of the vote in..
All of a sudden the big "Stop Count" yet totes of ballots are trucked in from everywhere.
Next thing you know 2 weeks or so later, Biden wins!
Every objective analyst knew that Biden would make a run once the late votes were counted.