Biden has revived democratic capitalism – and changed the economic paradigm

Presidents set agendas.
Agendas are not laws. The legislative branch makes all the laws.

The Repubs cut taxes for the wealthy and corporations.
Stupid comment. Both Republicrats and Demublicans cut taxes for all Americans.

That is what they do. The house follows the agenda.
Incorrect. The House of Representatives does not follow any agenda within the Executive branch. You should learn government fundamentals.

Bankers and wall street execs are who gave us the Bush depression.
The Obama Bubble-Burst was caused by Bill Clinton signing into law a very, very bad piece of legislation ... and we all saw what hapened.

There plenty of highly-rated economists
The main point here is that you wouldn't recognize one if he were introduced to you.

You do not have to have a guy making sure banks don't get hurt for what they do.
... but we all want someone who will safeguard our banking system and our financial markets.
 
Agendas are not laws. The legislative branch makes all the laws.


Stupid comment. Both Republicrats and Demublicans cut taxes for all Americans.


Incorrect. The House of Representatives does not follow any agenda within the Executive branch. You should learn government fundamentals.


The Obama Bubble-Burst was caused by Bill Clinton signing into law a very, very bad piece of legislation ... and we all saw what hapened.


The main point here is that you wouldn't recognize one if he were introduced to you.


... but we all want someone who will safeguard our banking system and our financial markets.

Sock no.23 is not well disguised. INToTHENIGHT makes more socks and says the same dumb shit.
The president sets the agenda. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3870&context=etd How stubbornly and proudly ignorant you are.
 
The FantasyLand Creatures can sure spin a powerful story.....has nothing to do with reality but it sure is entertaining!
 
Agendas are not laws. The legislative branch makes all the laws.


Stupid comment. Both Republicrats and Demublicans cut taxes for all Americans.


Incorrect. The House of Representatives does not follow any agenda within the Executive branch. You should learn government fundamentals.


The Obama Bubble-Burst was caused by Bill Clinton signing into law a very, very bad piece of legislation ... and we all saw what hapened.


The main point here is that you wouldn't recognize one if he were introduced to you.


... but we all want someone who will safeguard our banking system and our financial markets.

Your drive-by answers show how little you know. You are one right-wing pigeonholed fool. The Bush banking crash was a product of Phil Gramm Republican bill. He was a righty who tried to pass his "modernization act" several times. It was actually an elimination of banking oversight, the comingling of deposits and investments by banks. It eliminated Glass Steagal. It was the producer of the Bush near depression.
In the aftermath of the banking investment debacle , banks were made whole and bankers were not jailed. Treasury was run by Geithner a central banker.
When Trump wanted to put him in the administration, even rightys rallied against him.
I feel like I am talking to a child when respond to your horrible misinformed posts.
 
Sock no.23 is not well disguised. INToTHENIGHT makes more socks and says the same dumb shit.
It's always the uneducated leftists (I know, redundant) who are constantly obsessing over their sock fantasies.

The president sets the agenda.
It doesn't matter how many times you write this, the President's agenda isn't any law and nobody in any other branch of government is required to adhere to it.

Go learn some fundamentals, if learning ever ceases to be too much work, that is.
 
Your drive-by answers show how little you know.
Your inability to understand what I write signals a total lack of any value to your responses.

You are one right-wing pigeonholed fool.
You have no idea what my positions are. In fact, there doesn't seem to be anything that you know. You are a waste of bandwidth.

The Bush banking crash was a product of Phil Gramm Republican bill.
Incorrect. The Obama Bubble-Burst was caused by what I explained. Since you don't know anything, I'm not surprised you are mistaken about this as well.
 
It's always the uneducated leftists (I know, redundant) who are constantly obsessing over their sock fantasies.


It doesn't matter how many times you write this, the President's agenda isn't any law and nobody in any other branch of government is required to adhere to it.

Go learn some fundamentals, if learning ever ceases to be too much work, that is.

So you think the goals of Biden's admin and Trump's were irrelevant? Did you see how different they were? https://www.haaretz.com/life/books/...olocaust/00000180-5bee-d718-afd9-dffe4abe0000
Presidents set agendas. They determine to a great degree, what policies will be explored and perhaps legislation will be passed to implement them. An agenda is not a law. You are comparing different things. However, a president determines what direction the country goes in. That is a plan and direction. Did you see how Bidens election promises became law? Did you see Trump's did when he was in office? I did not say agendas are laws You did. Why do you insist on floating that contradiction again and again?
 
Last edited:
So you think the goals of Biden's admin and Trump's were irrelevant?
You're a leftist, so logic is not your strong suit. Stay focused. "A President's agenda is irrelevant" does not follow from "A President's agenda is not a law."

Presidents set agendas.
That still doesn't make them laws. The Legislative Branch makes all the laws. Period.

They determine to a great degree, what policies will be explored and perhaps legislation will be passed to implement them.
Agendas are not bills that become laws.

However, a President determines what direction the country goes in.
Nope. The people do. The President only determines his agenda.

Did you see how Bidens election promises became law?
Biden didn't promise anything. Biden didn't say anything coherent, although I was able to discern "Awww C'mon, Man". Did that become a law?

I did not say agendas are laws You did.
Reading comprehension is not your strength. I'm the one telling you that agendas are not laws. You think agendas determine legislation.
 
...annnd the usual 'sock' BS. You obviously can't counter any argument. The President is not a king, dumbass.

Why are you such an asshole? The president is not king. Did you just make that up? Presidents set agendas. That is what they do. You don't present arguments. You make drive-by claims. You ignorant asshole. I did not say he was a king, merely that he sets the agenda.
Do you think saying the president is not a king is presenting an argument? Do you really? dumb shit. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3870&context=etd There are not 4 people where who use the same format, the same words, have the same shitty attitude and use the same words. You have socks and are fooling nobody.
 
Has anyone yet defined this supposed Democratic Capitalism? It sounds an awful lot like "socialism" which is best described as "terrible economic policy combined with hatred and oppression of humanity."
 
Why are you such an asshole?
...annnnd the usual insults.
The president is not king. Did you just make that up?
No. The founders did.
Presidents set agendas. That is what they do.
Everyone that wants to accomplish something sets an agenda. Big hairy deal.
You don't present arguments. You make drive-by claims.
Inversion fallacy. You are describing yourself again.
You ignorant asshole. I did not say he was a king, merely that he sets the agenda.
Repetition fallacy. Insult fallacy.
Do you think saying the president is not a king is presenting an argument?
Yes. It's the argument the founders made when creating the United States. I happen to agree with it. I support the Constitution of the United States and anyone in politics that does so. That is why I support Trump.
Do you really? dumb shit. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3870&context=etd There are not 4 people where who use the same format, the same words, have the same shitty attitude and use the same words.
You have socks
and are fooling nobody.
If you are going to go by that criteria to define a 'sock', then you, Dutch, Perry, moon, lv246, and many others around here are all socks. They use the same format, the same words, and have the same shitty attitude. They also repeat themselves.

Science is the same...everywhere...all the time. New theories are created, and others are falsified. If someone else describes this, that doesn't make them a sock.
Mathematics is the same...everywhere...all the time. 2+2 still equals 4. If someone else describes this, that doesn't make them a sock.
Logic is the same. ?A still produces A. That doesn't make them a sock. If you make a fallacy (an error in logic), and someone else points it out, that doesn't make them a sock.
The Constitution of the United States is the same. If someone else quotes it or refers to it, that doesn't make them a sock.
I have created a few acronyms to reduce wordiness of common problems you idiots have. If someone else happens to use them, that doesn't make them a sock.
If someone happens to be on another forum that I frequent, that doesn't make them a sock.

You are whining because you have no argument. The whole 'sock' thing is just another attempt at insulting.

You are a nothing. Throwing insults and doing the usual 'sock' BS is a nothing. You have no argument. You tried and are still trying to give the President kingship through semantic arguments (a fallacy). You are a bigot and hateful. You, like the other Democrats, discard the Constitution of the United States and all state Constitutions.
 
Has anyone yet defined this supposed Democratic Capitalism? It sounds an awful lot like "socialism" which is best described as "terrible economic policy combined with hatred and oppression of humanity."

It's just another buzzword. If gfm7175 is monitoring, he should add it to his Lispy Leftist Buzzword list (if it's not already on it...I don't monitor that list that closely, due to it's length!).
This buzzword seems to be used to justify socialism. He might as well just say 'socialism'. Of course, THAT word is politically incorrect...he's trying to change it.

Kinda like way the Church of Global Warming tries to rename itself to 'Climate Change'. It's an attempt to protect the guilty or to rewarm a phrase that is no longer accepted by the public.
 
Has anyone yet defined this supposed Democratic Capitalism? It sounds an awful lot like "socialism" which is best described as "terrible economic policy combined with hatred and oppression of humanity."

It's just another buzzword. If gfm7175 is monitoring, he should add it to his Lispy Leftist Buzzword list (if it's not already on it...I don't monitor that list that closely, due to it's length!).
This buzzword seems to be used to justify socialism. He might as well just say 'socialism'. Of course, THAT word is politically incorrect...he's trying to change it.

Kinda like way the Church of Global Warming tries to rename itself to 'Climate Change'. It's an attempt to protect the guilty or to rewarm a phrase that is no longer accepted by the public.
The Lispy Leftist List is closing in on 500 entries now (was 493, now 494 after this latest entry). My suspicion is in alignment with both of your suspicions that this term ('democratic capitalism') is yet another attempt to justify socialism... IOW, it is yet another rebranding effort.

I'm going to insert a three item list here and I want you to notice what is happening to the left side of it vs the right side of it:

THE TRUTH: Socialism // Capitalism
PRIOR BRANDING ATTEMPT: Democratic Socialism // Capitalism
CURRENT BRANDING ATTEMPT: Democratic Capitalism // Capitalism

What you will notice is that the left side keeps changing with each attempt while the right side remains the same. The left side keeps trying out different buzzwords while the right side remains steady with the truth.

Socialism is an unpopular term... QUICK, add the popular term "democratic" in front of it!! Dang nabbit, didn't work... I guess we gotta stick with the term capitalism that people like, but we ourselves hate it, so let's just add the word "democratic" in front of it to cleanse it and pretend that socialism is "a different way to do capitalism".
 
Last edited:
Back
Top