Only 16% (look it up) of the "border bill" goes to tightening the border. Most goes to Ukraine. So, in reality, it's NOT a "border bill."
Your low intelligence must be the reason you assume these very different purposes have equivalent costs.
Only 16% (look it up) of the "border bill" goes to tightening the border. Most goes to Ukraine. So, in reality, it's NOT a "border bill."
The crises at the border is so bad, the Trumpublicans are taking a two week vacation.
Your low intelligence must be the reason you assume these very different purposes have equivalent costs.
Does the Senate bill require migrants to REMAIN in MEXICO until their trial date? Does it require asylum seekers to apply in the "first safe country" they enter?
I find it amusing you showing your immaturity by calling me low intelligence. Why should a "border bill" only contain 16% (again, look it up) going to the border?
The name is "The Emergency National Security Supplemental Appropriations Act", as both the Ukraine and border measures are viewed as pertaining to national security. The reason funds for protecting the border are less than funds for war against Russia
is referred to in the comment you found amusing and, in any case, should be obvious.
So you are saying RB60 is right.![]()
Evidently you're as dumb as he is.
funds for protecting the border are less
Denial is a river in Mexico.
Why is this so difficult? If a woman sent her teenager to the store to buy a pack of gum and a quart of milk would she give kid the same amount of money for the gum as for the milk?
The name is "The Emergency National Security Supplemental Appropriations Act", as both the Ukraine and border measures are viewed as pertaining to national security. The reason funds for protecting the border are less than funds for war against Russia
is referred to in the comment you found amusing and, in any case, should be obvious.
Why is this so difficult? If a woman sent her teenager to the store to buy a pack of gum and a quart of milk would she give kid the same amount of money for the gum as for the milk?
Perhaps you need to stop being a white lib misogynist pig.
"Emergency National Security" when only 16% goes toward it?
The Senate bill does nothing to secure the border. It is designed to facilitate illegal immigration, to make the process even faster.
What does the Bill give to the Union?
The House GOP, I should say Trump, are the ones facilitating illegal immigration, and we all know why
I find it amusing you showing your immaturity by calling me low intelligence. Why should a "border bill" only contain 16% (again, look it up) going to the border?
Tell us why. I need a refresher.
WTF are you babbling about? What does that have to do with anything?