Big Brother at it Again

People have to show picture ID to cash a check or even use their debit card or credit card in many cases.

If you don't take your priviledge to vote seriously enough to show who you are, why should I or anyone else care.....unless it hurts the party who needs every vote they can get. Gee, I wonder who that will be this year?
 
If the DOJ is so interested in making sure that low income people aren't denied their rights because of a state issued ID, why aren't they blocking all the laws requiring an ID to buy a gun from a dealer or to carry a gun with a permit and ID?????
 
SmarterThanYou said:
If the DOJ is so interested in making sure that low income people aren't denied their rights because of a state issued ID, why aren't they blocking all the laws requiring an ID to buy a gun from a dealer or to carry a gun with a permit and ID?????
Click to expand...

Exactly. Once again we see the Demoncrap party hiding behind the victim card. Hispanics can't get a picture ID like everyone else? Well, because they just can't, so that means the law is discriminatory because Eric Holder says so because Obama told him to say so because Obama wants to get as many votes as possible to keep his phoney baloney job.
 
Alias said:
People have to show picture ID to cash a check or even use their debit card or credit card in many cases.

If you don't take your priviledge to vote seriously enough to show who you are, why should I or anyone else care.....unless it hurts the party who needs every vote they can get. Gee, I wonder who that will be this year?
Click to expand...

Yours.
 
Alias said:
Exactly. Once again we see the Demoncrap party hiding behind the victim card. Hispanics can't get a picture ID like everyone else? Well, because they just can't, so that means the law is discriminatory because Eric Holder says so because Obama told him to say so because Obama wants to get as many votes as possible to keep his phoney baloney job.
Click to expand...

You are advocating an additional layer of cost and structure to an existing government program which has already been proven un-needed.
Further, implementing sad plan curtails the right to vote of the most extreme of the poor.

You are the one pushing the Big Brother agenda
 
Rune said:
You are advocating an additional layer of cost and structure to an existing government program which has already been proven un-needed.
Further, implementing sad plan curtails the right to vote of the most extreme of the poor.

You are the one pushing the Big Brother agenda
Click to expand...

it has not been prove it is not needed. please stop spouting what your leftwing masters tell you to spout. thank you.
 
Yurt said:
it has not been prove it is not needed. please stop spouting what your leftwing masters tell you to spout. thank you.
Click to expand...

i have a problem with this. haven't we allowed enough stupid laws to be written under the supposed theory that it MIGHT solve a problem? this is why we have over 20,000 gun laws and hardly any of them do what they are supposed to. stop making laws just because
 
Alias said:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...voter-id-law/2012/03/12/gIQAUzgW7R_story.html

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/elisab...ud_lights_up_rep_sheila_jackson_lees_district
Click to expand...

sorry about the duplicate post, but i happen to agree with the justice departments action

as for the right wing rag townhall, it sucks when it cites 'numerous' instances of voter fraud which it fails to substantiate

the rep thing about protecting the nation from voter fraud is a weak straw man at best and an effort to disenfranchise voters that are more likely to vote democratic than republican at worse
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top