Bill Maher: Pot is the new gay marriage civil rights issue

Pot is less harmful than beer, most conservative would agree prohibition was an utter failure!
Pot prohibition is a symbol of failed government.

Again I am not arguing whether it is or isn't as harmful as alcohol. I am saying the data arguing its medicinal purposes is dubious at best. Medical marijuana is a hoax. It is a ruse used by its adherents to push for legalization making it seem more "mainstream" and innocuous.

You are arguing against points I have not made. I will say again, I have not made a decision regarding legalization of marijuana one way or te other except that the Feds should not be involved. I guess I am a moderate in the issue
 
I can't stand Bloomberg, he is so arrogant. Even when he's right on an issue (which he isn't on this), he's such a jerk that you wonder if you're not better off having him on the other side.

The good news is that even he must know that him being the president is just a wet dream.
 
Even New York has lightened searches, bumfuck retarded Christian backassward Louisiana is debating reducing penalties.
Glacially slow but steady progress.
Smoke em if you got em
 
Yes. I believe medical marijuana is a hoax. I did not say it would lead to more hoaxes. We will converse much better if you actually read what I write.

Pretty soon people will be extolling the virtues of medical heroin and medical "shrooms"

Is that what you wrote?

Then I'm reading what you wrote.

The 'hoax' is the belief that only a doctor can tell people what makes them feel better.

If someone has anger management issues and they go see a doctor about it .. the doctor will most likely prescribe that person medication that is far more dangerous than smoking marijuana .. and likely more costly.

If that person can control his mood with marijuana .. as many do .. then the hoax is a doctor prescribing something more harmful and expensive than something that person actually enjoys doing.

I have no doubt that if marijuana were legal, some doctors would prescribe, 'some a joint and chill out.'
 
Even New York has lightened searches, bumfuck retarded Christian backassward Louisiana is debating reducing penalties.
Glacially slow but steady progress.
Smoke em if you got em

Chong+Gang.png
 
You pork pigs and ram sheep, we don't want any inter species relationships around here!!

You know....I didn't excuse 3D of anything, you douche....I didn't understand his.pointbof "might makes right"...it seemed to me he was defending sex with animals. I simply wanted clarification, and yes....I threw a little good natured barb in there.
 
Pretty soon people will be extolling the virtues of medical heroin and medical "shrooms"

Is that what you wrote?

Then I'm reading what you wrote.

The 'hoax' is the belief that only a doctor can tell people what makes them feel better.

If someone has anger management issues and they go see a doctor about it .. the doctor will most likely prescribe that person medication that is far more dangerous than smoking marijuana .. and likely more costly.

If that person can control his mood with marijuana .. as many do .. then the hoax is a doctor prescribing something more harmful and expensive than something that person actually enjoys doing.

I have no doubt that if marijuana were legal, some doctors would prescribe, 'some a joint and chill out.'

You have authorized your government to make those decisions on your behalf. That is why you folks like the FDA. You can't pick and choose your socialism.

And for that remark, I am sorry you didn't recognize the sarcasm. Although one could make that same argument that groin improves their mood. Right? So should we legalize heroin on those grounds and call it medical?
 
You have authorized your government to make those decisions on your behalf. That is why you folks like the FDA. You can't pick and choose your socialism.

And for that remark, I am sorry you didn't recognize the sarcasm. Although one could make that same argument that groin improves their mood. Right? So should we legalize heroin on those grounds and call it medical?

Heroin is dangerous .. marijuana isn't .. and you're making the same false argument you claimed that you weren't.
 
Personally, I don't see it as a civil rights issue. However, I think drugs should be legalized, but that we should educate people not to use the harder ones. But if people want to f*** up their bodies by doing acid or meth, who am I to tell them they can't?

Of course - if they drive under the influence, steal, or pollute the environment with a meth lab, or grow pot on federal lands- throw the book at them. They are responsible for what they do to get drugs or while using them.

But if my neighbor does drugs and it doesn't impact me or society, why is it my business?

For now, of course pot is the main one we're talking about legalizing. And we should.

And we need to use hemp in a lot more products!

But really - if they aren't bothering anyone else, I don't care what drugs people use.
 
I have not made a decision on the issue of legalizing marijuana, but I have reviewed the evidence with regards to medicinal purposes and there is none.

Really? You have reviewed all the evidence? There is not one ounce of data out there suggesting that aids or cancer patients have benefited from medical THC?
 
Get the fuck out of here. You know there isn't anyone but a handful.of.people that think that way. You're as sick as they come RacistX

ROFL

Thats what they said about homo's marrying, now look at where we are headed. Its just around the corner, right next to Pedophilia.
 
Ease up. I haven't taken a stance on legal marijuana one way or the other. So please extend me the courtesy of not presuming what I think on the matter based on one stated conclusion.

I have not made a decision on the issue of legalizing marijuana, but I have reviewed the evidence with regards to medicinal purposes and there is none. It has been shrewdly used as a foil to push for legalization.

Even if I were to support legalizing marijuana, I would still find the evidence supporting medicinal use lacking and dubious.

As it stands today I don't support the federal gobblement being involved so I am very consistent in my views. It is the big government types who are inconsistent in my opinion.

Bullshit, you have not reviewed anything and the recent study from the NCI says you are wrong.

You are not consistent.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top