dancindave
Verified User
So here’s human reproduction medical pseudoscience that is about as scientific as a fat jolly Santa Claus coming down the chimney…..
Birth of Jesus - Christmas
- Thread starter Cypress
- Start date
Margot
Verified User
This isn't science
dancindave
Verified User
What part or parts of the pseudoscience aren’t science?
Margot
Verified User
I wasn't replying to that
Reverting back now to your predisposition to be insulting and derogatory?
Daylight63
Verified User
Huh? You CONSTANTLY tell me you don't like reading too much stuff. When I post a detailed post you tell me "too many words".
I honestly thought you didn't like reading much.
Daylight63
Verified User
This is why I thought you didn't like to read a lot of stuff.
Sorry if I was mistaken about what you meant.
Ah, the haters are out for Christmas.
Merry Christmas to all.
Merry Christmas to all.
dancindave
Verified User
So another Christian Nation SCOTUS Rehnquist Fourth Reich July “one nation under God with equal justice under law” Christmas as a jolly fat Santa Claus coming down a chimney & that human reproduction medical pseudoscience “man is God” suicidal super ego sociopsychopathogical homicidal human farming not so master race not so master plan genocide pogrom……
Angry on Christmas day?
Why scientists haven’t cracked consciousness
The science of consciousness still has no theory. We still can’t say how or why the experience of consciousness arises.In 1998, at the conference of the Association for the Scientific Study of Consciousness (ASSC), the neuroscientist Christof Koch made a bet with the philosopher David Chalmers: by 2023, science would be able to explain how the brain’s tangle of neurons gives rise to the phenomenon we call consciousness. The winner would get a case of wine.
Koch was a professor of cognitive biology who helped pioneer the mechanistic study of the “neural correlates of consciousness,” which maps the relationship between brain activity and subjective experiences. He believed that consciousness was fundamentally measurable and that it was only a matter of time before science identified how it arose in the brain.
At the 26th ASSC conference this past weekend, 25 years after the initial wager, the results were declared: Koch lost. Despite years of scientific effort — a time during which the science of consciousness shifted from the fringe to a mainstream, reputable, even exciting area of study — we still can’t say how or why the experience of consciousness arises.
Why scientists haven’t cracked consciousness
The science of consciousness still has no theory.
www.vox.com
Daylight63
Verified User
What Neuroscientists Think, and Don’t Think, About Consciousness
Scientific American"The tacitly implied mechanism of consciousness in neuroscience approaches is that it somehow just happens. This reliance on a “magical emergence” of consciousness does not address the “objectively unreasonable” proposition that elements that have no attributes or properties that can be said to relate to consciousness somehow aggregate to produce it."
The approach the majority of neuroscientists take to the question of how consciousness is generated, it is probably fair to say, is to ignore it. Although there are active research programs looking at correlates of consciousness, and explorations of informational properties of what might be relevant neural ensembles, the tacitly implied mechanism of consciousness in these approaches is that it somehow just happens. This reliance on a “magical emergence” of consciousness does not address the “objectively unreasonable” proposition that elements that have no attributes or properties that can be said to relate to consciousness somehow aggregate to produce it. Neuroscience has furnished evidence that neurons are fundamental to consciousness; at the fine and gross scale, aspects of our conscious experience depend on specific patterns of neural activity – in some way, the connectivity of neurons computes the features of our experience. So how do we get from knowing that some specific configurations of cells produce consciousness to understanding why this would be the case?
What Neuroscientists Think, and Don’t Think, About Consciousness - PMC
The approach the majority of neuroscientists take to the question of how consciousness is generated, it is probably fair to say, is to ignore it. Although there are active research programs looking at correlates of consciousness, and explorations of ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Merry Christmas to you
I've read most of the major religious texts of the world, and I attempt to look for sources of truth independent of the atomic materialism of physicalism, in literature, art, and philosophy.