"BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP - IT'S "ALL OVER RED ROVER" SCOTUS WILL RULE IN FAVOUR OF TRUMP

It is possible for a mother to be a non-citizen while the child is a citizen. That's guaranteed by the Constitution which is the thing Trump is hoping to destroy.

Apparently when his most recent child, Barron, was born, Barron was a citizen but Melania was still a non-citizen.
Barron's father was an American and his mother had a green card at his birth. The SCOTUS has said the children of permanent residents that are born in the US are citizens. Illegal Aliens are not legal permanent residents.
 
Why did Congress pass the Snyder Act?

To make up for the fact that the Indian territories were excluded from the 14th Amendment. At least that is what I understand.


Doesn't change the fact that it is technically possible for a child to be a citizen and the mother not to be a citizen.
 
Barron's father was an American and his mother had a green card at his birth.
...so a legal immigrant at the time.
The SCOTUS has said the children of permanent residents that are born in the US are citizens. Illegal Aliens are not legal permanent residents.
SCOTUS has no authority to change any constitution or to overrule the authority of Congress.
Only CONGRESS can determine that. See Article I.
 
The Constitution: The contract between the states that created the Federal Government. AKA the contract that lawyers and judges pretend is not a contract, because if contract law applied, then the original intent would matter. If original intent mattered nobody could say it was a "living document"... So.

Until you get the SCOTUS full of folks that understand that contract law should apply to this contract you are going to have morons telling you things like "The 14th Amendment made everyone citizens, except Native Americans"... but it didn't because "under the jurisdiction thereof" meant something different to the folks that wrote that thing than it does to us today. We know this because the dude that wrote it told us what it meant...
 
As of right now, yes. But the choice in terms of a US citizen born children born to illegal alien parents should be one of two outcomes:

1. The parents are deported and their children go with them. The child can reenter the US on their 18th birthday as an adult and US citizen.

2. The parents are deported and their children become wards of the government and placed in a foster home allowing them to grow up in the US as US citizens.

So, which do you prefer, keeping families together or breaking them up? After all, this shitty situation was caused entirely by the parent's decision to be criminals.
3. For the children's benefit and their own the parents are assisted in becoming U.S. citizens.
 
To make up for the fact that the Indian territories were excluded from the 14th Amendment. At least that is what I understand.


Doesn't change the fact that it is technically possible for a child to be a citizen and the mother not to be a citizen.
Where does it say that?
 
The Constitution: The contract between the states that created the Federal Government. AKA the contract that lawyers and judges pretend is not a contract, because if contract law applied, then the original intent would matter. If original intent mattered nobody could say it was a "living document"... So.

Until you get the SCOTUS full of folks that understand that contract law should apply to this contract you are going to have morons telling you things like "The 14th Amendment made everyone citizens, except Native Americans"... but it didn't because "under the jurisdiction thereof" meant something different to the folks that wrote that thing than it does to us today. We know this because the dude that wrote it told us what it meant...
Yep
 
3. For the children's benefit and their own the parents are assisted in becoming U.S. citizens.
The US doesn't need criminal aliens becoming citizens. Nor does the US need illiterate or semi-literate, turd-worlders with less than a 6th grade education who flaunt our laws. We have more than enough of our own due to the failure of our public education system.
 
If the 14th amendment does what libtards demand, than explain the need for 1924 Indian Citizenship Act

your ignorance is pretty clear to me

the interpretation of the constitution and subsequent amendments change. it is called judicial review and has happened since 1803

Phanny
So you agree that those born on American soil are US citizens as per the Constitution.

Yet another example of SO being used by a snake tongued cockwomble.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top