"BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP - IT'S "ALL OVER RED ROVER" SCOTUS WILL RULE IN FAVOUR OF TRUMP

Your king is tipped. Let me know when you want to play again.
giphy.webp
Now you are trying to be funny.
:magagrin:
 
There is only one way it should be interpreted. The SCOTUS studied the 14th and decided what the correct interpretation meant and they said:


The law upon the question before us has been well stated by Judge Deady in the District Court of the United States for the District of Oregon. In giving judgment against the plaintiff in a case resembling the case at bar, he said:
"Being born a member of 'an independent political community' -- the Chinook -- he was not born subject to the jurisdiction of the United States -- not born in its allegiance."

And that utterly destroys the Stalinists - IF the SCOTUS follows the law.

But there is a 4-4 split between the constitutionalists and the leftists. With Barrett as a tiebreaker. The question is will she follow the law, or be part of the girls club?
 
And that utterly destroys the Stalinists - IF the SCOTUS follows the law.

But there is a 4-4 split between the constitutionalists and the leftists. With Barrett as a tiebreaker. The question is will she follow the law, or be part of the girls club?
She has two adopted kids from Haiti. I suspect she will not follow the law on this one.
 
Ark was a citizen because at his birth his parents had permanent domicile in the US.
This wasn't the reason he was a citizen. It was simply a fact of the case, and an irrelevant one at that. This particular fact of the case happened to be mentioned.

The reason Ark was a citizen was because he was born in the US. His parents were examined to see if they were 1) diplomats or 2) hostile military occupiers, because those are the only exceptions. Lo' and behold, his parents were neither, ergo Ark was a citizen by birth in the US per the 14th Amendment.

SCOTUS agrees with me because I am merely citing SCOTUS.
 
Back
Top