If blacks are equal to whites then explain why
1. Black-americans come in last in all standardized tests. Asian-americans do fine on all the tests so it's not due to cultural bias in the tests.
2. Africa is by far the poorest and most backward continent on the planet. All of black africa is now controlled by blacks and has been for decades so it's not due to racism.
3. No black has ever won a Science Nobel Prize unless you count one in 1979 for the semi-science of economics. They have won many nobels in non-brain fields like Peace and also in Literature so it is not due to racism.
4. Out of 1725 chess grandmasters in the world, only THREE are black.
5. 50 years of affirmative action special treatment and blacks have fallen even further behind. What does that tell you?
Oh, look who's decided to play the role of the "race scientist" in our little theater of bigotry. Let's take a look each one of your racist 'facts'. I suspect you were brought up on hate by a goon with a white hood. You probably proudly display it as a centerpiece on your double wide living room wall. You disgust me far more than any Libtard.
First, your assertion about standardized tests is as intellectually bankrupt as it gets. In many public schools blacks may consistently score lower, because of educational disparities which are undeniable. The disparities exist because of liberal policies that in spite of 'good intentions' have caused schools to rapidly turn to shit for nearly all black neighborhoods, not because of melanin levels. For many of the same reasons there are undeniable economic barriers, and yes, even cultural biases in any generalized testing. That may sound to the average moron like just a liberal excuse but it's actually exists because of Bush's 'no child left behind' and common core testing more than anything else. I was never much of a Bush fan because he was such a pushover. Asians, who typically excel at testing in general, don't not fully escape cultural bias in the standardized test evident from good scores but not great as they tend to do when testing in subjects they choose to pursue. But let's not let those pesky realities interfere with your racism, right? After all, it's much easier to blame the test-taker than to acknowledge other issues like underfunded schools in predominantly black neighborhoods or the socio-economic conditions that impact educational outcomes.
All of which are squarely a result of the welfare state and the plethora of 'services' intended to help equalize blacks opportunities, but of course they predictably failed. Suppose you tell me where whites land on the list of races test score averages. If you knew, which I doubt you even know how to access that information, but if you did, you'd have to acknowledge that your race and mine is inferior to others by your own ignorant standard.
Moving on to Africa, your reductionist view is a masterclass in ignoring history. To claim that Africa's challenges are due to black governance, ignoring the centuries of colonial exploitation, resource theft, and the engineered political instability by external powers, is beyond ignorant. It's like blaming a patient for their illness without considering who poisoned their well. Africa's current state is a direct result of historical exploitation, not some intrinsic racial flaw. But why bother with nuance when you can just point fingers like a chimp with brain damage?
Now, let's talk Nobel Prizes. Your attempt to belittle black intellectual capacity by focusing on the science category is laughably narrow-minded. Only one black winner in economics since 1979, you say? Maybe if you bothered to look beyond your racial hatred, you'd see the historical underrepresentation in scientific fields as only one of many factors to consider. Oh, but blacks have won in Peace and Literature, where suddenly, they're not intellectually challenged? How convenient for your argument! It's also worth noting that the Nobel wasn't exactly set up to highlight diversity but rather to celebrate certain achievements, often influenced by who gets the opportunities in the first place. I guessing you have no idea about the history of nobel prizes and the method of awarding them.
I was planning on saving the best for last but I am completely wasting my time. I think I'll cut my losses on this one. I was simply going to respond "ok so you're a proud and vocal racist. I asked, you answered. The fact is, many died for your right to be an ignorant racist moron so that's your prerogative. I've sure you have a nice little group that gets together and dances around in sheets chanting white supremacist slogans. I've seen the documentaries and I was amazed how dumb a whole group can be. I half expected the leader to be some kind of charismatic genius that could give a good speech full of thinly veiled racist overtones, but that's not the reality. The groups are quite literally a bunch of inbred imbeciles. You may have been featured.
I realize that nothing I've written here will make a difference in your twisted thinking. I or anyone with a brain could write pages about each item on your laundry list of racist talking points. I think I'll finish up with a quote from the best Supreme Court Justice in my lifetime, oh, he happens to be black, I assume you are too stupid to know.
"I'd grown up fearing the lynch mobs of the Ku Klux Klan, as an adult I was starting to wonder if I'd been afraid of the wrong white people all along - where I was being pursued not by bigots in white robes, but by left-wing zealots draped in flowing sanctimony." Clarence Thomas
en.wikipedia.org
