Blackburn: "Can you provide a definition for the word 'woman'?"

Status
Not open for further replies.
gfm7175 said:
Very true. I always wear jeans, so my legs are just fine, but mosquitoes do like to attack my hands/arms, and then they love to find any little exposed place that they can go after, such as the neck, face, and even inside of ear lobes. Damn things! :)
Click to expand...


I know what you mean. No matter what the damn bug is, they can really be a pain. Around here we get two varieties of mosquitoes; a larger one that isn't so bad, and a tiny tiger striped one that is very aggressive. It leaves welts. We also get deer flies (like houseflies, but much larger) that can leave a pretty good welt. Out in eastern Wyoming is a small field fly, like a housefly, but they breed by the bazillions.
 
gfm7175 said:
Into the Night said:
I still do. Some aspects of working on airplanes means sanding and painting.

I can't any farmer around here that ever bothered with a mask for baling hay or handling the bales. Most around here use the giant roll style bales. Some use the brick style still. Because they wrap the rolls in white plastic to keep the bales green and fresh, I call harvest season around here 'marshmellow' season. They look like giant marshmellows sitting on the fields. :D

At least the top of your head won't get eaten alive by the damn things...just the rest of you. :D

I've never known any dryer to be satiated when it comes to socks! I've even checked the dryer vent outside. No socks made it through the vent either! I'm convinced every dryer has a worm hole built into them. :D
Click to expand...
Same here. I've never seen it, anyway.

Interesting. I should look closer around here, but in my immediate area, more seem to make use of the brick style bales (I've only ever handled the smaller sized ones). Then again, the farms in my immediate area at the time were small farms that just used small brick bales stacked inside of barns... Now there are more and more larger and corporate farms around here, and small brick bales just don't make much sense for that situation.

Very true. I always wear jeans, so my legs are just fine, but mosquitoes do like to attack my hands/arms, and then they love to find any little exposed place that they can go after, such as the neck, face, and even inside of ear lobes. Damn things! :)
Click to expand...

I love it when psychos talk to themselves. LOL
 
I would really love to advise Blackburn to get a haircut and use a deep moisturizer on her hair and face.
 
gfm7175 said:
I love it when delusional morons keep pining for Sybil, whoever that is...
Click to expand...

If you don't know who it is, then why do you "love it when delusional morons keep pining for Sybil"?

You're not fooling anyone, Sybil. Your manifesto in your signature tells everyone who and what you are.
 
gfm7175 said:
Rejecting a particular source (for good reason) is not a genetic fallacy. USA Today is not science, specifically biology with regard to this discussion. -- I've already lightly touched upon the biology involved with regard to said claims, and why I reject said claims based upon said biology.
Click to expand...

:palm: Again. USA Today did not create that article, they quoted a scientist. I don't suppose you took the time to actually read it, though. Furthermore, you are not the arbiter who decides whether or not a source is valid. Do your homework.
 
christiefan915 said:
:palm: Again. USA Today did not create that article, they quoted a scientist. I don't suppose you took the time to actually read it, though. Furthermore, you are not the arbiter who decides whether or not a source is valid. Do your homework.
Click to expand...

USA Today created the article. They quoted a person that calls themselves a 'scientist'. Despite your claim to the contrary, gfm IS the arbiter who decides whether any given source is accepted as valid when you are trying to use one with him.
I am the arbiter of whether any given source is valid to be accepted by me.

If he doesn't accept the source as valid. It isn't valid. You are going to have to use another source.

USA Today is notorious for biased articles. They're not quite as bad as Wikipedia, but they're close.

If ANY source discards a theory of science, there is no reason to pay any attention to that source.

Do you REALLY need a scientist to tell you what a women is??
 
Do right-wingers know that our Founding Fathers created our original Constitution and Bill of Rights to be both gender and race neutral from intelligent design and inception? What is not covered by our federal Constitution and Ten simple Amendments?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top