Bluesky has storm clouds gathering

Cause I can be. You magats are trying to get me to leave but will not win.

I'm not trying to get you to leave. Who is?

In a free society you are entitled to your opinion. I read stuff I think is nasty, unwise or wrong all the time. I choose to ignore it, or respond to it instead of leaving the venue.

You "can be" here because the man running this platform believes in freedom of expression as long as it's legal. So does Elon Musk.

Bluesky (and before Musk bought it, Twitter) routinely bans or censors opinions the medreators deem unpleasant, yet you seem to prefer that.

Consider this Exhibit A, if you will.
 
I'm not trying to get you to leave. Who is?

In a free society you are entitled to your opinion. I read stuff I think is nasty, unwise or wrong all the time. I choose to ignore it, or respond to it instead of leaving the venue.

You "can be" here because the man running this platform believes in freedom of expression as long as it's legal. So does Elon Musk.

Bluesky (and before Musk bought it, Twitter) routinely bans or censors opinions the medreators deem unpleasant, yet you seem to prefer that.

Consider this Exhibit A, if you will.
I'd say its your side who is always trying to get people banned here. One prime example is that thing they call @TOP with her 12B crusade. Thank goodness Dammo is aware of her stupid games.
 
I'd say its your side who is always trying to get people banned here. One prime example is that thing they call @TOP with her 12B crusade. Thank goodness Dammo is aware of her stupid games.
Agreed. JPP MAGAts are among the biggest fucking whiners on the forum.

Amirite, @TOP? Did you check your PM box today? I think @Joe said you has a special picture for you. LOL
 
I'd say its your side who is always trying to get people banned here. One prime example is that thing they call @TOP with her 12B crusade. Thank goodness Dammo is aware of her stupid games.

You're entitled to your opinion. That doesn't tar me with the same brush, even if it's valid.

You don't seem to be willing to address the issue, though.

Should Damocles use the same preemptive methods as Bluesky and pre-Musk Twitter to prevent you from seeing things you don't agree with or believe to be true, or do you reserve the right to exercise your own judgment, as he currently allows?

BTW, I find your use of epithets and insults unseemly in a good faith discussion, but I'm not going to demand to be shielded from such things.

Do you really fear words on a screen?
 
You're entitled to your opinion. That doesn't tar me with the same brush, even if it's valid.

You don't seem to be willing to address the issue, though.

Should Damocles use the same preemptive methods as Bluesky and pre-Musk Twitter to prevent you from seeing things you don't agree with or believe to be true, or do you reserve the right to exercise your own judgment, as he currently allows?

BTW, I find your use of epithets and insults unseemly in a good faith discussion, but I'm not going to demand to be shielded from such things.

Do you really fear words on a screen?
Bluesky isn't preventing me from seeing anything. If I don't want to read from a magat I simply mute or block them. Problem solved. The same options are here.

Good faith? LOL from a person who frequents twitter. Good one
 
Bluesky isn't preventing me from seeing anything. If I don't want to read from a magat I simply mute or block them. Problem solved. The same options are here.

Good faith? LOL from a person who frequents twitter. Good one
How do you know Bluesky isn't preventing you from seeing anything?

Millions of people frequent X evey day. Are they all acting in bad faith?
 
Gcg7R-QXMAAoymO
 
Back
Top