blackascoal
The Force is With Me
We backed Al Queda in the conflict ..
.. Ambassador Stevens was the paymaster/bagman.
He was killed by Libyan loyalists.
That's the truth they don't want told.
Boston vs. Benghazi
- Thread starter Howey
- Start date
We backed Al Queda in the conflict ..
.. Ambassador Stevens was the paymaster/bagman.
He was killed by Libyan loyalists.
That's the truth they don't want told.
Cancel 2016.2
The Almighty
Had they not continued spreading the same incorrect information AFTER they knew it was incorrect, I would give them the benefit of the doubt. But that is not what happened.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
That's not really correct. That is ONE thing they were pissed about, but a lot of it was the failure to identify it as terrorism right away, and perceived "evasiveness" in general. It's factually incorrect to try to portray it as being just about the video.
Fox had a front page story about it every day. For them, it was more about the "lying" and hesitance to use the characterization of "terror" in the beginning.
I suspect that is true.
I think the term "Lybian Loyalist" is misleading....
Stevens was killed by those loyal to the Quadafy regime for having supported America and our allies attempts to back the opposition.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
Stevens was killed by Libyan loyalists who did not want their nation overthrown by NATO and Al Queda for its resources.
US lies PROVED in under 30 seconds ..
MILLIONS of Libyans protesting AGAINST NATO invasion and FOR Gaddafi.
Benghazi Attack. Libya’s Green Resistance Did It… And NATO Powers Are Covering Up
US Ambassador’s Killing Had Nothing to Do With Al Qaeda, Islamist Blowback or Anti-Islamic Video
http://www.globalresearch.ca/libyas-green-resistance-did-it-and-nato-powers-are-covering-up/5305409
TODAY, once peaceful and prosperous Libya now stands in ruins and chaos.
The truth is staring you in the face good brother.
Hey Howie, and Jarod, we knew it was terrorism from the beginning, the rest was a cover up for gun running to al queda operatives trying to overthrow the Syrian Government. Anything else you say is B.S
How about it didn't fit the template from the campaign trail that said they had Al Qaeda on the run. It was a political coverup to keep him from being defeated in the election, for his lack of action to save American lives.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
Awwww - does it make you made when I call you out as the koolaid-guzzling GOP apologist that you are?
You should look up "apologism." I don't think you know what it means.
This is simply an attempt to spin it away. It was all about the video. Obama was not calling it terrorism because it was a "reaction to an irresponsible video"...
"Fox News" (and everybody with a brain) was upset that he spent three weeks trying to blame a stupid video rather than calling it what it was, then because he off-hand mentioned terror in some speech tried to cover that turd.
Either way it wasn't about "lack of information" it was about directly spouting misinformation as well as an incapacity for simply stating what it was, all of it was linked to the same spurious claim that the frickin' video had something to do with it.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
No spin. You're the one trying to mischaracterize history; this is something you do.
Fox had a headline every day on Benghazi. There was a wide range of complaints outside of blaming the video. Withholding information, not calling it terror right away, ordering forces to stand down (which they didn't - and that was a big font headline, btw), etc.
To try to say that all righties cared about was blaming the video is pathetic.
Yes, you are spinning, you'd think you were paid to come up with some excuses. The video was, on a whole, the reason that "Fox" had a headline every day on Benghazi. Almost all of the "wide range" of complaints are directly linked to the attempt to mischaracterize the reason for the attack.
Withholding information - based on the attempt to get people to regard it as a "reaction to an irresponsible video"...
Not calling it terror - based on the attempt to regard it as a "reaction to an irresponsible video"...
Ordering forces to stand down - This is one of the few that isn't directly related to the video, but was important.
Basically, the vast majority of the complaints all had a direct link to the attempt at misinformation, the attempt to blame the stupid video.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
That's ludicrous. Fox's stories about the above topics did not center around or even mention the video. That is YOUR spin.
Can you hear yourself? I suspect not. You went over to the dark side long ago.
And I just did a search on Benghazi under your name - not a heck of a lot about the video, Damo, but plenty of other incriminations. I bumped one; I can bump another dozen if you're feeling masochistic.