Bowl Games

Invading someone without provocation is being the aggressor.

I know slavery to be bad because it is only supported by people like you, and the perverts who founded the CSA.

Refusing to let someone go peacefully is provocation.

Since I don't support slavery, it must mean you think it wasn't that bad.
 
If a woman dates you, she's white trash.

I'll tell my girlfriend you think so. She will, no doubt, laugh.

Given the things you have said, points you have defended and your general demeanor, if there is anyone who fits the description of "white trash" here, it would be you.
 
I'll tell my girlfriend you think so. She will, no doubt, laugh.

Given the things you have said, points you have defended and your general demeanor, if there is anyone who fits the description of "white trash" here, it would be you.

I already told her she was.

I've stated facts. That you don't like them is your fault. I bet you've also lowered yourself to that level too, boy.
 
I already told her she was.

I've stated facts. That you don't like them is your fault. I bet you've also lowered yourself to that level too, boy.

I have stated facts as well.

As for the rest of your post, it merely proves my point that you are white trash.
 
I haven't lowered myself to the level to which you've clearly lowered yourself. Why would you do something like that?

The depths to which you have lowered yourself know no bounds.

I have not lowered myself at all. You tried to brag about posting facts. Please stick to actual facts.
 
The depths to which you have lowered yourself know no bounds.

I have not lowered myself at all. You tried to brag about posting facts. Please stick to actual facts.

It's hard for you to lower yourself when you were born at the bottom, boy. It seems your parents being white trash didn't produce anything but another generation of it.

I post facts. That you can't accept it proves you're white trash.
 
Refusing to let someone go peacefully is provocation.

Since I don't support slavery, it must mean you think it wasn't that bad.

They left, and then they attacked. There had been peace before they attacked. Hence, they were the aggressor.

If you support the cause of the CSA, then you support the "cornerstone" on which it was built.
 
They left, and then they attacked. There had been peace before they attacked. Hence, they were the aggressor.

If you support the cause of the CSA, then you support the "cornerstone" on which it was built.

When those not wanting them to leave try to force them to stay, that's not peace. That's aggression.

The cornerstone on which it was built was a group of States fed up with the overbearing federal government abusing the Constitution. I support the federal government operating within the Constitution. It's clear a lefty like you supports big government and big government forcing obedience.
 
When those not wanting them to leave try to force them to stay, that's not peace. That's aggression.

The cornerstone on which it was built was a group of States fed up with the overbearing federal government abusing the Constitution. I support the federal government operating within the Constitution. It's clear a lefty like you supports big government and big government forcing obedience.

That's not what VP Alexander Stephens said in his Cornerstone Speech. Nor is it what any of the states said in their formal secession documents. The entire state of Mississippi declared, for example, that "our position is thoroughly identified with the position of slavery."

How about you CSA apologists stop putting words in their mouths, and argue only with the words that they spoke and wrote. You can't play amateur psychologists with these people to create fan fiction that supports your narrative.

Also, no one used force on the CSA until it committed an act of war. Like when Gen Suleimani had his Shi'ite militias attack a US embassy. Trump ordered him killed, and your stupid Democrats claimed that Trump was the aggressor. You people literally have not changed in 150 years.
 
Has nothing to do with the SEC. It's just another day where one thug encourages a future thug to do something illegal.

How does handing out monopoly money encourage anything except making fools of the press and the people who can't tell the difference?
 
That's not what VP Alexander Stephens said in his Cornerstone Speech. Nor is it what any of the states said in their formal secession documents. The entire state of Mississippi declared, for example, that "our position is thoroughly identified with the position of slavery."

How about you CSA apologists stop putting words in their mouths, and argue only with the words that they spoke and wrote. You can't play amateur psychologists with these people to create fan fiction that supports your narrative.

Also, no one used force on the CSA until it committed an act of war. Like when Gen Suleimani had his Shi'ite militias attack a US embassy. Trump ordered him killed, and your stupid Democrats claimed that Trump was the aggressor. You people literally have not changed in 150 years.

Why don't you show me where I said Trump was an aggressor. Until then, it seems you're putting words in my mouth and something else in yours.

Am I Alexander Stevens? Am I the State of Mississippi?
 
I didn't know handing out monopoly money was against the rules.

Last I recall hundred dollar bills in Monoply weren't green, and I ain't yet seen an apologist come up with the Monopoly money "explanation"

Just the symbolism is enough, especially since neither player looks suprised, as I said, seemingly just another day in the SEC
 
Back
Top