Boy killed by dogs in zoo tragedy

[Canceled.2014.1]

So where did police stand in relation to the target at the Pittsburgh Zoo?

Good question.

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

Thanks for admitting you don't know and were wildly speculating earlier.

Would you have saved the kid with superior marksmanship and cool-headed action?

As I pointed out earlier, I have made to statements that should have been taken as fact. I offered my opinion. When a sentence contains "I think" and "probably", I am offering an opinion. But the fact that the story said the platform was 14 feet about the enclosure does bear out what I said.

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

So you have made "to" (sic) statements that should have been taken as fact.

I believe I referred to the statement that contained the words "I think" and "probably". That statement was obviously not a statement of fact.

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

So which "to (sic) statements that should have been taken as fact" did you refer to above?

The statement above did not refer to any statement that should be taken as fact. It merely stated that one was obviously not a statement of fact.

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

Really?

My mistake. A typo. It should have been "shouldn't" instead of "should".

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

Odd.

So one of the "to" (sic) statements" you made shouldn't be regarded as a fact?



Quite a typo.

No, not at all. The context told everything. When a sentence contains "I think" and "probably" it is obviously not a statement of fact.

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

Does this sentence contain "I think" and "probably"?



I'm having difficulty taking any of your statements as fact at this point.

Ok.

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

The sentence we have been discussing is "Yeah, I think it probably was.".

You really have no interest in a topic, do you? You focus so much more on trying for a "gotcha".

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

It is?

A cursory glance at the last several posts shows that isn't true.


The sentence in question is this one:

Now you are lying. The complete quote should have been: "As I pointed out earlier, I have made to statements that should have been taken as fact. I offered my opinion. When a sentence contains "I think" and "probably", I am offering an opinion."

And the sentence with "I think" and "probably" was "Yeah, I think it probably was.".

Looks like you answered that question I have been asking over and over.

 

[Canceled.2014.1]

Now you want to pretend you were denying your lying in another sentence, after at least four posts referencing the one I quoted repeatedly?

Awesome.

No, we have been talking about the sentence in which I used the words "I think" and "probably". You want to now claim that it is the sentence in which I quoted those words.

It started when you were saying I had no evidence of what I said, and I admitted I didn't but that what I said showed I did not intend it to be a statement of fact.

To claim that it is any different is simply you lying.