Brainless inciter Maxine Waters promotes violence and civil war

[serendipity]

No. Only to brainless lying leftist halfwits like yourself.



Translation: blah blah blah blah.



Brainless word salad in a desperate attempt to flail.

So tell us brainless wonder, did you write that? Yes or no.

He acknowledged that it was written by the AI chatbot Grok.

 

[Truth Detector]

Run fritzy run

From you?

 

[Truth Detector]

He acknowledged that it was written by the AI chatbot Grok.

Never heard of Grok, don't care about Grok. If it isn't written by a person, it is meaningless.

One thing we can be sure of, dopes like him will never make a coherent argument or admit their failed beliefs.

 

[serendipity]

Never heard of Grok, don't care about Grok. If it isn't written by a person, it is meaningless.

One thing we can be sure of, dopes like him will never make a coherent argument or admit their failed beliefs.

Grok is a generative artificial intelligence chatbot developed by xAI. Based on the large language model (LLM) of the same name, it was launched in 2023 as an initiative by Elon Musk.[3] The chatbot is advertised as having a "sense of humor" and direct access to sister platform X, formerly known as Twitter.

 

[Truth Detector]

Grok is a generative artificial intelligence chatbot developed by xAI. Based on the large language model (LLM) of the same name, it was launched in 2023 as an initiative by Elon Musk.[3] The chatbot is advertised as having a "sense of humor" and direct access to sister platform X, formerly known as Twitter.

I really don't care. When you are using a bot to make your answers for you, it is indicative of a lack of intelligence, knowledge and IQ.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

Whether Maxine Waters promoted civil war and violence is a matter of interpretation, as her statements have been polarizing and subject to differing views. Over the years, she has made remarks that some critics argue incite confrontation or violence, while her supporters contend she advocates for passionate but nonviolent resistance, often in the context of civil rights.

In March 2025, at a Congressional Black Caucus event, Waters said she believed President Trump "expects violence" and is "working toward a civil war." She tied this to policies she claimed would leave people hungry and desperate, suggesting Trump anticipated unrest as a result. However, she explicitly urged nonviolence, citing Martin Luther King Jr.'s teachings, saying, "He taught us to organize and protest, but he taught us nonviolence." Critics, including some on X and conservative outlets like Infowars, called this inflammatory, accusing her of projecting intent onto Trump to stoke division. Her defenders, including some Democratic colleagues, framed it as a critique of Trump’s actions, not a call to arms.

Historically, Waters has faced similar accusations. In 2018, she encouraged supporters to confront Trump administration officials in public spaces, saying, "If you see anybody from that cabinet in a restaurant... you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them." Republicans, including Kevin McCarthy, labeled this as incitement, while Waters and Democrats like Nancy Pelosi argued it echoed civil rights-era tactics, not violence. In 2021, ahead of the Derek Chauvin verdict, she told protesters in Minnesota to "get more confrontational" if the outcome was unjust. This drew sharp rebuke—Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene even sought her expulsion from Congress—yet Waters clarified she meant nonviolent action, like speaking out or legislating, not physical violence. The House rejected censure attempts, and no legal action followed.

Her comments on the 1992 Los Angeles riots also stirred debate. She called it a "rebellion" rather than a riot, saying it was "somewhat understandable, if not acceptable," due to systemic injustice. Critics saw this as excusing violence; Waters maintained she condemned the acts while highlighting root causes.

No definitive evidence shows Waters explicitly calling for civil war or physical violence. Her rhetoric often pushes boundaries—urging "confrontation" or predicting unrest—but she consistently ties it to organized protest or warns of others’ actions (e.g., Trump’s). Legal authorities have never charged her with incitement, which requires intent and likelihood of imminent lawlessness under U.S. law. Still, her words have fueled perceptions among opponents that she promotes division or violence, a view amplified by partisan lenses and social media.

The debate hinges on context and intent. Supporters see her as a fierce advocate channeling anger into activism; detractors view her as reckless, risking escalation. Without a clear, unambiguous call to violence or civil war—and given her repeated nods to nonviolence—the accusation remains contested, not proven.

@Grok

Sorry dude.

Maxine Waters is just a ranting, unhinged, angry, and thoroughly corrupt, Black woman with serious hate and anger issues.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

I really don't care. When you are using a bot to make your answers for you, it is indicative of a lack of intelligence, knowledge and IQ.

Exactly. If someone here needs a computer program to write their answer, they should quit the board and hand their account over to the computer program.

 

[FastLane]

Maxine Waters is brain dead from years and years of wearing her wig to tight.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

These are evasions rather than answers to the OP questions.

Same here. The keyword is "men".

This is a non sequitur

More have been deported under Biden than Trump.

Not as a percentage of entries. Because so many entered under Biden, an unprecedented number, deportations were up. As a percentage of illegal entries, Biden had the lowest percentage of illegals deported ever.

It already was in place. The chainsaw approach doesn't work. BTW where's the fraud?

Yes, the "chainsaw approach" does work when fraud, waste, and abuse are rampant. You focus only on fraud, which clearly is present, but minor compared to waste and abuse.

Putin invaded Ukraine and currently is trolling Trump. What is YOUR solution?

Negotiate a peace to a war where two amateur thugs are in the 20th round, so-to-speak, and barely able to stand up. Stop propping up one side and get them to work out a deal.

Didn't Democrats ask for transparency?

No

Women and children deserve protection.

We can agree on that.

 

[Truth Detector]

Maxine Waters is brain dead from years and years of wearing her wig to tight.

 

[Earl]

Maxine Waters is just a ranting, unhinged, angry, and thoroughly corrupt, Black woman with serious hate and anger issues.

She's stupid, too.

She thought that Korea (Crimea) was being invaded by the Russians.

 

[AProudLefty]

Exactly. If someone here needs a computer program to write their answer, they should quit the board and hand their account over to the computer program.

And yet you continue to reply to @Legion.

 

[Truth Detector]

And yet you continue to reply to @Legion.

And yet, you continue to be a brainless thread trolling dumbass.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

She's stupid, too.

She thought that Korea (Crimea) was being invaded by the Russians.

It was in like 1905. You know, back when Waters was in grade school...

 

[T. A. Gardner]

And yet you continue to reply to @Legion.

You keep misspelling lesion...

 

[AProudLefty]

You keep misspelling lesion...

My bad.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Apparently assassination attempts are not enough to end the shrill insanity of the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses.

Apparently BLM riots that cost lives and billions in damage are not enough to end the shrill insanity of the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses.

Apparently burning Teslas and charging stations or taking shots at dealerships and harassing Tesla owners is not enough to end the shrill insanity of the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses.

Maxine is the poster asshole for what JD Vance stated, the enemy is not in a foreign land, but actually within. I say it is proven to be the Democratic Party of the Luing Jackass.

Maxine Waters Encourages Violence Against Trump Supporters and Cabinet. Sedition? ​

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HQV6U3iTXeA&list=PLAdHTUOALB6LNxGP-ZpnHw5VDsBs79FFa

There is no question that democrats are the enemy of all freedom and peace loving people.

Every democrat throwing firebombs needs to meet a Kyle Rittenhouse.

 

[AProudLefty]

There is no question that democrats are the enemy of all freedom and peace loving people.

Every democrat throwing firebombs needs to meet a Kyle Rittenhouse.

Does political party matter when it comes to crimes?

 

[Uncensored2008]

That's a non-answer brainless wonder.

How are you for truth and America when all you ever do is lie?



That's another of your dumb lies. It's very clear what I am for.

I think that men should be NOT be allowed to compete in women's sports by dressing as women?
What is your view?

I think that our borders should be secure and that those who break immigration law should get deported?
What is your view?

I believe that we should cut costs in our massive bureaucracy and balance the budget?
What is your view?

I believe that we should sue for a peaceful settlement in Ukraine rather than never ending war, death and destruction?
What is your view?

I believe in ending Government corruption?
What is your view?

I believe in transparency in Government?
What is your view?

I believe that the government has expanded well beyond the original intent in the Constitution?
What is your view?

I believe Israel has a right to exist?
What is your view?

I believe that we should expand oil exploration and produce more oil and gas?
What is your view?

I believe that we should not have stupid things like "sanctuary cities"?
What is your view?

I believe that Governors and Mayors should cooperate with ICE as they attempt to remove illegal aliens from the country?
What is your view?

I believe that pro Hamas protestors should be removed from campuses and Federal funding removed if those administrators refuse to do so?
What is your view?

I believe that the Federal bureaucracy too big?
What is your view?

I don't expect you to answer these questions because you're too dishonest, lazy and stupid to even take the time.

Excellent.

But no way the Lizard will answer. He'll duck and throw up straw man fallacies - as alway.

 

[AProudLefty]

Excellent.

But no way the Lizard will answer. He'll duck and throw up straw man fallacies - as alway.

I have answered.