The GOP lost in 2012 and 2016? WTF are you smoking dumbass. Have you figured out the DNC alternative plan to "BUT TRUMP" yet?
And they will keep losing. I am good with that.
Brand new poll: Trump disapproval at RECORD LOW, no one's fooled by orange asshole
- Thread starter reagansghost
- Start date
The GOP lost in 2012 and 2016? WTF are you smoking dumbass. Have you figured out the DNC alternative plan to "BUT TRUMP" yet?
And they will keep losing. I am good with that.
Cry harder dumbass. It is apparent you like looking like a dishonest moron and love the taste of crow.
You sad, stupid, pathetic LOW IQ moron; try to keep up or go back to your padded cell.
Ah, yes, "Pelosi" can reign in the left wing of her party, especially since it largely centers upon freshman representatives the right wing media is obsessed with
I never made any prediction other than there will be no impeachment in this Congress, well, other than Biden will run, which you said would not happen during the pick on Biden week
We shall see. Again, I am not arguing that they will impeach. I am pointing out to the leftist asshat, arsecheese, that the narrative is coming from THEM, not our side.
Wait a minute, "when the chair of the House Judiciary Committee states on National TV that he thinks Trump should be impeached" isn't implying that you think they will impeach?
If it doesn't, why did you post it?
Saved.
QUOTE=archives; Mueller is not going to lose, at best, hung jury, meaning they do it all over again, but you are right, for eight months the right wing media has been bombarding Trump's line that Manafort had nothing to do with the campaign, but if he is somehow found not guilty, they will be shouting that it proves Trump is off the hook and it all is a witch hunt
Just shows they are reaching for straws
I said he would not run? Find the quote dumb fuck.
Wait a minute you dishonest shit-for-brains; are you trying to put words in my mouth? STFU, seriously.
No, but you authoritarianly stated it was "in the Constitution" as if that ended the topic, to which I had to point out to you so is the third Amendemt, there are a collection of items "in the Constitution" that no longer have relevance
And if you are anal retentive over spelling, well, that's your hurdle
Again, why would you include that statement if you weren't implying the Democrats were going to impeach Trump?
I wonder what stupid narrative you will take up when Trump wins re-election in 2020.
The script is already written. "Russian collusion" will be the cry until 2024. They will claim the government agencies are covering up for Trump. It's so obvious where the left is going.
Saved.
QUOTE=archives; Mueller is not going to lose, at best, hung jury, meaning they do it all over again, but you are right, for eight months the right wing media has been bombarding Trump's line that Manafort had nothing to do with the campaign, but if he is somehow found not guilty, they will be shouting that it proves Trump is off the hook and it all is a witch hunt
Just shows they are reaching for straws
I said he would not run? Find the quote dumb fuck.
Good save, and I was correct on Mueller, it turned out a hung jury, nothing was settled, America isn't buying the "total vindication" line, investigations are continuing, it is still as big a relevant topic today as it was when I made the prediction.
And you did say he would not run, very authoritatively if I remember correctly
Thanks Sean, stop back when you got something new
Another stupid prediction snowflake? When the chair of the House Judiciary Committee states on National TV that he thinks Trump should be impeached, you should pay attention.
See above you brain dead dumb fuck.
....it is also obvious that this FALSE narrative will lead to political losses in 2020.
Another RW idiot who tries to filter out numbers to cover the truth.
What truth?
There is nothing unsettled except in the tiny low IQ brains of leftist hacks like yourself.
I never said that you lying asshole; but you are free to find that quote and I will gladly retract. I did say you are a lying moron in a very factual and authoritative way however.
Since the last election using EC was in 2016 and the 2020 election will also use it, I'd say that portion of it is relevant. As for the 3rd Amendment, you and I both know that hasn't applied in many, many, many years.
I'm not anal retentive over spelling. I simply expect someone like you that pretends he's smart to be able to do simple things like check spelling. Apparently the simple things are even too hard for you.
We did it with reason, yours has been proven false, we still never got to the bottom of Benghazi except to say Obama was running guns to Isis, also we know Hillary broke the law that one isn't over yet.
Polls are bunk, Earl.