reagansghost
eternal
what was that, troll?
nice capitulation
what was that, troll?
asked, answered, argumentative, #STFU
Not at all, Trump has already admitted to the content of the phone call, the questions surrounding it will still remain even if he releases it unedited, plus, as "reagansghost" just noted, it is the whistle blower's complaint that is at the center of the controversy, the phone call

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/09/24/po...-transcript/index.html?r=https://www.cnn.com/
Trump just checkmated the Democrats.
![]()

this interview is hilarious! Pelosi is stuck on impeachment no matter what - she is getting unreal softball questions but it appears she is saying even with no quid pro quo, there is an implied quid pro quo.
Simply asking for Biden to be investigated is somehow....FFS I can't follow this ditz's "logic"
first off you are talking thru your asshat about "law": whistle blowing only applies to the intelligence community.First, no one knows if that is the "source material," or all of the "source material," and second, what could be in the transcript of the phone call that everyone already doesn't know? Trump has already confessed he asked the Ukrainians to investigate Biden and that he sent Rudi to Spain to further pressure the Ukrainians, and the timing of the aid package adds to the suspense
Bottom line the question still remains what is in the whistle blower's complaint and why is the White House going to such an extent to make sure no one sees it, even those who by law are suppose to see it
so because it wasn't investigated before it should not be investigated now?Why would anyone expect or even ask a Democrat House to investigate Biden when Trump had two years of complete control to investigate Biden and the GOP had ten, ten years inwhich the investigated everything and anything relating to Obama/Hillary, and neither never found the inneundo even worth mentioning?
You Donkeycrat. The so called whistle blower DOES NOT have first hand knowledge of the phone call. Now you're getting the ACTUAL transcript of the phone call, which is the best evidence, and you're claiming a second hand source is more reliable.
I hope you never ever become a lawyer or a juror.
Ladies and gentlemen, I present you with this second hand source that defeats the actual transcript of what was said...
![]()
https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/09/24/po...-transcript/index.html?r=https://www.cnn.com/
Trump just checkmated the Democrats.
![]()
I need to prove Trump is lying?
hahahaha
the phone call is the source material -That lacking "first hand knowledge" comes from a source in the White House, someone who said they saw the complaint, I wouldn't put a lot of faith in that one. Besides, no one knows the complaint is even over this matter or just over this matter, until it is at least seen by members of Congress, the questions will remain
Secondly, everyone already knows what is in the phone call, Trump even admitted he asked the Ukrainians to investigate Biden, the transcript will be nothing new
no he won't
so why doesn't he release the actual statement given to the DNI by the whilstleblower stupid?

https://www-m.cnn.com/2019/09/24/po...-transcript/index.html?r=https://www.cnn.com/
Trump just checkmated the Democrats.
![]()
Shut up assfuck
That lacking "first hand knowledge" comes from a source in the White House, someone who said they saw the complaint, I wouldn't put a lot of faith in that one. Besides, no one knows the complaint is even over this matter or just over this matter, until it is at least seen by members of Congress, the questions will remain
Secondly, everyone already knows what is in the phone call, Trump even admitted he asked the Ukrainians to investigate Biden, the transcript will be nothing new
so because it wasn't investigated before it should not be investigated now?
Besides the phone call was asking Zelenski- not the House to investigate
( the House is too busy investigating Mueller or whateverthefuck)
Nope, wrong again. Try harder.