Brennan Suppressed Intel Showing Russia Favored Clinton

Look who is always first to bring up Homosexuality around here!

Makes one wonder why? Here is a man who struggles with his sexuality, and as a cover he accuses others of something he is!

And now we know who he has a man crush for- DON LEMON!

Very telling dude!

Like I said, I get it, the DNC ministry of propaganda hasn't spoon fed you your taking points yet, so tell you what, how about you sit back, relax and wait a few hours so you can suck your spin out of the tip of Don Lemon's cock?
 
So...the quote you have here doesn't say that Crowdstrike says the DNC wasn't hacked...it says this one guy can't say personally if they were based on that.

So you didn't even read the thing you posted because it completely contradicts the claims you make against it.

What a fucking fraud.

It says they don't even have concrete evidence that it was hacked by the Russians you illiterate fuck.
 
Keep the ad-hominems coming you laughable faggot because you know you have no rebuttal whatsoever I've completely debunked every falsifiable claim you have made over the last two weeks, you're not very good at this.

You steal my lines because you're a hack.

You can't even come up with anything on your own, it's all swiped from other people.

You are incapable of having any original thoughts of your own...and you may have even just outed yourself because that line is one I've said to your other IDs several times.

You're sloppy. You're the one who is really bad at this. You can't even keep up this act before sliding back into the habits that make you so identifiable.

Did you think that creating a new ID would let you "start over"?
 
No you stupid bitch:

"There are times when we can see data exfiltrated, and we can say conclusively. But in this case it appears it was set up to be exfiltrated, but we just don’t have the evidence that says it actually left."
"There’s not evidence that they were actually exfiltrated. There's circumstantial evidence but no evidence that they were actually exfiltrated."
"There is circumstantial evidence that that data was exfiltrated off the network. … We didn't have a sensor in place that saw data leave. We said that the data left based on the circumstantial evidence. That was the conclusion that we made."
"Sir, I was just trying to be factually accurate, that we didn't see the data leave, but we believe it left, based on what we saw."
Asked directly if he could "unequivocally say" whether "it was or was not exfiltrated out of DNC," Henry told the committee: "I can't say based on that."


https://www.realclearinvestigations...d_no_proof_of_russian_hack_of_dnc_123596.html

How credible is RealClearPolitics???? We all know that lackey Bill Barr has been working behind the seen to wipe out the Russian investigation to appease Trump, and we also know that Trump and the right wing GOP have used disinformation as a political tool.
 
Keep the ad-hominems coming you laughable faggot because you know you have no rebuttal whatsoever I've completely debunked every falsifiable claim you have made over the last two weeks, you're not very good at this.

But I see you don't deny this FreeSpeech is a sock.

So who are you? Teflon? Legion? Truth Detector?

We know you're not genuine, so why keep up this charade?
 
How credible is RealClearPolitics???? We all know that lackey Bill Barr has been working behind the seen to wipe out the Russian investigation to appease Trump, and we also know that Trump and the right wing GOP have used disinformation as a political tool.

You laughable fuck they quoted the Congessional testimony from the Crowdstrike head verbatim, the secondary source is irrelevant the primary source is Shawn Henry under oath.
 
It's definitely someone's sock. The account was created just this May. If it is Truth Detector, we can very easily just see if he was smart enough to switch his IDs often enough to give the illusion that the two accounts are two separate people. It's how anatta was outed.

But he/she can't reveal himself/herself with the same dumb annoying posting.
 
No, THIS ONE GUY says that.

That one guy is the head of Crowdstrike which conducted the forensic investigation of the DNC server upon which the DNI assessment was based in fact "Henry personally led the remediation and forensics analysis of the DNC server after being warned of a breach in late April 2016...".
God you're fucking dumb.
 
You laughable fuck they quoted the Congessional testimony from the Crowdstrike head verbatim, the secondary source is irrelevant the primary source is Shawn Henry under oath.

You beginning to post just like Truth Detector.
 
That one guy is the head of Crowdstrike which conducted the forensic investigation of the DNC server upon which the DNI assessment was based. God you're fucking dumb.

But he didn't conduct it...and he didn't say it wasn't hacked. You lied and said that is what he said, but then you posted the quote where he didn't actually say that.
 
You beginning to post just like Truth Detector.

Because FreeSpeech is Truth Detector, and if you go and look at both profiles, you'll see FreeSpeech posting when Truth Detector doesn't.

That's how you know they're the same person.
 
You laughable fuck they quoted the Congessional testimony from the Crowdstrike head verbatim, the secondary source is irrelevant the primary source is Shawn Henry under oath.

You dumb gullible fuck, the right wing media regularly spreads disinformation, until I see it in the mainstream news, it's bullshit.
 
Because FreeSpeech is Truth Detector, and if you go and look at both profiles, you'll see FreeSpeech posting when Truth Detector doesn't.

That's how you know they're the same person.

OK then FreeSpeech belongs on my ignore list.
 
OK then FreeSpeech belongs on my ignore list.

Truth Detector doesn't post when FreeSpeech does.

Truth's last post was 12:53AM, but then FreeSpeech picks up the effort at 4:57AM and posts all day, meanwhile Truth Detector has not posted since 12:53AM.
 
Let’s guess; brietfart, gateway, infowars, daily caller, Rt, Wtf, blaze, or some other right wing blogger site not mentioned?

I’m going breitfart or gateway, they seem to be favorites lately

Well, it probably wasn't CNN/MSNBC/RT/NYT/WaPo/SCMP, so, I think we're safe.
 
Back
Top