BRING OUT YOUR DEAD! BRING OUT YOUR DEAD!

christiefan915 said:
No voter fraud here, either.

"Defendants in a case against one of the nation's strictest voter ID laws in Pennsylvania made a major concession to plaintiffs this week, just days ahead of the start of the trial over the measure.

In a stipulation agreement signed earlier this month, state officials conceded that they had no evidence of prior in-person voter fraud, or even any reason to believe that such crimes would occur with more frequency if a voter ID law wasn't in effect.

"There have been no investigations or prosecutions of in-person voter fraud in Pennsylvania; and the parties do not have direct personal knowledge of any such investigations or prosecutions in other states,” the statement reads.

According to the agreement, the state “will not offer any evidence in this action that in-person voter fraud has in fact occurred in Pennsylvania and elsewhere,” nor will it "offer argument or evidence that in-person voter fraud is likely to occur in November 2012 in the absence of the Photo ID law.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/24/pennsylvania-voter-id-trial_n_1697980.html
Click to expand...


Interesting that the part that you left unbolded is a very important part of the equation...It reads:

"There have been no investigations.."

So when liberals scream 'give us proof' none exists...Wonder why? Who is blocking any investigations into alleged voter fraud?

How is it done? Read here...

http://www.aim.org/special-report/the-lefts-national-vote-fraud-strategy-exposed/
 
j-mac said:
Interesting that the part that you left unbolded is a very important part of the equation...It reads:

"There have been no investigations.."

So when liberals scream 'give us proof' none exists...Wonder why? Who is blocking any investigations into alleged voter fraud?

How is it done? Read here...

http://www.aim.org/special-report/the-lefts-national-vote-fraud-strategy-exposed/
Click to expand...

From Reed Irvine, the kook who claimed Vince Foster was murdered? Yeah...real credible.
 
j-mac said:
Interesting that the part that you left unbolded is a very important part of the equation...It reads:

"There have been no investigations.."

So when liberals scream 'give us proof' none exists...Wonder why? Who is blocking any investigations into alleged voter fraud?[/url]
Click to expand...

Ummm...that was Republicans saying there's no voter fraud.
 
j-mac said:
Interesting that the part that you left unbolded is a very important part of the equation...It reads:

"There have been no investigations.."

So when liberals scream 'give us proof' none exists...Wonder why? Who is blocking any investigations into alleged voter fraud?

How is it done? Read here...

http://www.aim.org/special-report/the-lefts-national-vote-fraud-strategy-exposed/
Click to expand...

I suggest that investigations are started when credible allegations are made. See Jerry Sandusky for details.
 
Xielon said:
Weren't you liberals the ones claiming that the Republicans committed voter fraud in 2000 and 2004? Now, suddenly no voter fraud exists, and never has existed, ever? Interesting...
Click to expand...

That's a completely different crime. When someone votes for say... Gore... and the machine registers a vote for say... Bush, it's a different crime than someone who wants to vote more than once or who is unregistered or a felon and tries to vote.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top