LOL. What was that song?Well, he is an underpants gnome isn't he?
LOL. What was that song?Well, he is an underpants gnome isn't he?
Who are you speaking of? Schaffer is going to kick some Udall butt. Seriously.It's a pop culture reference. You didn't get it (surprisingly).
In any event, is there any question that Bush was referring to Obama and the Democrats with his "some people" bullshit?
And by the way, Damo, tell your guy Schaffer to get a new campaign manager. Fucking amateurs.
It's a pop culture reference. You didn't get it (surprisingly).
.
Who are you speaking of? Schaffer is going to kick some Udall butt. Seriously.
And yes, there clearly is a question about it. Mr. Blogspot using "anonymous aides" is weak.
do elaborate
Don't you have google on your interwebs?
Oh, yeah that ad with the picture of McKinley... Yeah, he should have caught that. I am sure he got an earful from Bob.Yeah, Schaffer moves mountains, or so his ads would have you believe.
Again, the article was written by Ed Henry, CNN's White House Correspondent. I'm not sure who "Mr. Blogspot" is but I am certain he has nothing to do with references to anonymous aides. And really, when anonymous aides simply confirm what everyone knows to be true but which the White House has reason to conceal for appearance purposes, I have little trouble with their usage.
Oh, yeah that ad with the picture of McKinley... Yeah, he should have caught that. I am sure he got an earful from Bob.
Yeah. It won't stop him from beating Udall though. And the ad is simply going to be fixed and re-ran. It's not like Bob did it personally or something.It's too bad for Schaffer. It was a good ad. Like I said though, amateur hour.