Bye, Bye, Freedom Of Speech

Yakuda said:
No I don't want you cunts telling people what's lies and what's bullshit. That's what you stupid fucking idiots can't seem to get through your fucking skulls. Who the fuck died and left you in charge of deciding whats a lie and what's bullshit? Exactly how fucking pompous are you assholes? People can decide for themselves whats lies and what's bullshit but you fucking idiots don't actually want that do you? You need to control the fucking narrative. Its why you need people to be stupid and afraid.
Click to expand...

Wow. You need to chill out.

Facts:

Evolution is true.
Heliocentrism is true.
Global warming is true.
COVID-19 exists.
There was no mass voter fraud. Biden won the election fairly.
 
Michael_Panetta said:
Wow. You need to chill out.

Facts:

Evolution is true.
Heliocentrism is true.
Global warming is true.
COVID-19 exists.
There was no mass voter fraud. Biden won the election fairly.
Click to expand...

Oh that's right this from a believer in truth over facts. Therein lies your problem but its stupidity or blindness that keeps you from seeing it. Care to guess which I think it is?
 
Flanders said:
if China Joe Biden steals the election.


It is a bit of a stretch to say that falsely yelling FIRE! in a crowded theater would cause thinking humans to trample one another in their rush to the exits. Since the FIRE! ruling was overturned, I have not heard that millions of American theatergoers are trampled to death. As a matter of fact no one in the Twin Towers was trampled when they knew those buildings were on fire.

So what protected theatergoers before 1919?

My understanding of the FIRE! restraint on free speech is that political free speech would remain absolute, but not all speech would be so blessed. At least that is what the High Court seemed to be saying at the time. That one prohibition appeared to be reasonable on the face of it. Since then political free speech is no longer absolute; right along with every other kind.

Would the Nifty Nine from a bygone era have made that pronouncement had they known that Intelligent Design, campaign finance reform, and banning politically incorrect speech would follow? It is impossible to say.

Incidentally, how many times did the words “limited speech” appear in print, commentaries, High Court decisions, etc., prior to 1919? How many times did James Madison invoke those words?

It is no secret that all governments just love protecting meaningless speech. In the real world offensive speech requires the most protection, not touchy-feely sermons.
​

https://www.justplainpolitics.com/s...Of-Freedom-Of-The-Press&p=2931557#post2931557

Abolishing freedom of speech became a Democrat Party conspiracy on the day government media lost their monopoly on public discourse. Jonathan Turley’s warning is one Supreme Court ruling away from legitimated the conspiracy; i.e. ruling in favor of a lying thief and everything China Joe Biden promises:


A prominent liberal lawyer who has been involved in some of America's highest-profile constitutional disputes is warning of an alarming rollback of free speech in Western nations.

The latest is the adoption by Norway of a criminal law that punishes people for "hate speech" toward transgender people in private conversations, noted Jonathan Turley, a professor of law at George Washington University in Washington, D.C.

"Such speech controls in Europe have led to a chilling effect on political and religious speech," Turley wrote. "In their homes, people will often share religious and political views that depart from majoritarian values or beliefs. This law would regulate those conversations and criminalize the expression of prohibited viewpoints."

Turley said the "most chilling fact" for Americans is that "European-style speech controls have become a core value in the Democratic Party."
​

NOTE: When Stuttering Joe Biden was a kid he hated everyone who spoke without stuttering because they made him feel inferior. Biden’s hatred now includes the printed word and pictures.


"Once a party that fought for free speech, it has become the party demanding Internet censorship and hate speech laws," he said. "President-Elect Joe Biden has called for speech controls and recently appointed a transition head for agency media issues that is one of the most pronounced anti-free speech figures in the United States. It is a trend that seems now to be find support in the media, which celebrated the speech of French President Emmanuel Macron before Congress where he called on the United States to follow the model of Europe on hate speech."

Turley warned that "the very right that has long defined us as a nation" hangs in the balance.

"Once we cross the Rubicon into speech criminalization and controls, Europe has shown that it is rarely possible to work back to liberties lost," he argued. "We are moving into potentially the most anti-free speech period of American history — and possibly the most anti-free speech administration."

Turley noted that many politicians are already arguing for citizens to give up their free speech rights in forums such as the internet.

"With the media echoing many of these anti-free speech sentiments, it will require a greater effort of those who value the First Amendment and its core place in our constitutional system."

Reuters reported Norway's law punishes "hate speech" against transgenders in public with up to three years in prison. If convicted of making the remarks in private, the term would be one year.

Meanwhile, in Scotland, the justice minister has announced he intends to clamp down on "hate speech" in private homes under a new bill that critics warn could make possessing the Bible a crime.

The bill leaves out a crucial defense included in other U.K. hate crime legislation protecting conversations in the home from police intervention, free speech advocates point out, according to the U.K.'s Christian Institute.

Humza Haroon Yousaf, the cabinet secretary for justice, issued the warning in a conversation with the Justice Committee about the proposed legislation.

The Christian Institute said Yousaf is refusing to provide a "dwelling defense," insisting that "hateful speech" in the home should be criminalized.

Lord Bracadale, the judge whose recommendations led to the bill, later advised members of the Scottish Parliament that they should think carefully about allowing a public order offense to extend into the private sphere.

He said concern about such actions is "well-founded."

The Times of London reported the justice secretary said conversations over the dinner table that incite hatred must be prosecuted under the law.

It noted that journalists and theater directors also could face charges if what they write is perceived as deliberately stoking "prejudice."

A move similar to Scotland's also is being considered in England and Wales. The Law Commission, in a 540-page government document, has disclosed plans to lower the threshold for hate crimes, including criminalizing so-called "hate speech" in private dwellings, the U.K.'s Christian Institute said.

Harry Miller, a former police officer who founded Fair Cop, warned that if the private home law is adopted, a "comment over the dinner table about a huge range of people could lead to a prison sentence."

Sarah Phillimore, a family law attorney, said: "I cannot believe the government is being asked to consider surveillance of citizens in their own home. How will the evidence of such hate crimes be collected? Will we have an East German-style secret police like the Stasi?"

The Law Commission report said that stirring up division over "race, religion or sexual orientation" in homes should be criminalized.
​


Jonathan Turley: Criminalization of private speech coming to U.S.
European-style controls now 'core value in the Democratic Party'
By WND Staff
Published December 6, 2020 at 4:16pm

https://www.wnd.com/2020/12/jonathan-turley-criminalization-private-speech-coming-u-s/
​
Click to expand...

Huge if true.
 
Yakuda said:
Don't you know that speech people dont like is "inflammatory"? Dont you know that making people feeling "uncomfortable" is now a punishable offense unless of course you're a leftist in which case you can say whatever the fuck you like?

Did you see the recent story about the skank sister of the skank cyrus? I can't believe we will have another one of these cunts to contend with but that's modern culture for you. Anyway the younger sister cunt of the older sister cunt called Candace Owens a "nappy ass heaux". When she got kickback about it she claimed she didn't know the term nappy was racist. She's either stupid a liar or a leftist. Remember when Don Imus called the Rutgers women's basketball team, nappy headed hos? These fucking low life's are a blite on America
Click to expand...

Don't you know that people don't like dumb people?
 
Geeko Sportivo said:
I think this has more to do with FREE enterprise than FREE speech.

Companies should be free to run their own business the way they see fit.

Media outlets like Facebook or Twitter are FREE to ban users and or their comments according to their own rules- THAT THEY ARE FREE TO HAVE AND HOLD!

FREE SPEECH MY ASS IDIOTS!

Has absolutely nothing to do with FREE speech!

This just goes to show you how TRUMPTARDS conflate issues, and get off onto tangents and wild goose chases beating dead horses using hysteria, Fake News, Conspiracy Theories, and sensationalism.

THEY DON'T CALL THEM TRUMPTARDS WITHOUT A REASON!
Click to expand...

The day Biden takes office is the day they put the Statue of Liberty into a body bag. There goes the world's last chance at anything but misery.
 
It's the Republican Party that cannot survive in a democracy.
They're a decreasing minority that depends on gerrymandering and voter suppression to survive.

Free speech is a function of democracy, and democracy is the enemy of republicans.
 
What a shame that you dumbfuck racist morons can't stockpile hate speech like you do ammo and guns. What a shame that you think that our country's freedoms mean that you can run around yelling n-word this and c-word that with no consequences. How terrible that private communications businesses won't let you use their platforms to spread hate, instigate violence, and try to stupid-ize other idiots like yourself.

Sucks to be an ostracized piece of shit, doesn't it? :rofl2:
 
NiftyNiblick said:
It's the Republican Party that cannot survive in a democracy.
They're a decreasing minority that depends on gerrymandering and voter suppression to survive.

Free speech is a function of democracy, and democracy is the enemy of republicans.
Click to expand...

last I saw, both republicans and democrats were trying to take some guns away from us...........
 
The trumpanzees need to explain how jerrymandering and voter suppression are activities in defense of Democracy.

They're not ashamed to talk out of their asses because they need to breathe through their mouths, primitive troglodytes that they are.

They can recite talking points as given to them, albeit not very articulately, of course,

but they're actually not ideological. Their understanding of political principles simply doesn't reach that level.

They hate progressive liberals because we look down our noses at racists, xenophobes, religious bigots, misogynists, and anti-intellectuals like they're cursed to being.
Supporting fascist oligarchs is how they know how to piss us off. What they're actually doing is giving us another reason to look down at them--and we didn't need another reason.
They're garbage. We have status. They're illiterate. We're educated. They have '88 pickups. We have BMWs. They have assault weapons. We have functioning phalluses. They live in Bald Knob. We live in Boston, New York, and San Francisco.
And those of us who aren't there yet are determined to get there by hard work and modern thinking, not by cooking meth and voting for diseased pig fucking orangutans.

So that's why they hate us. They're jealous and why wouldn't they be?
 
coldjoint said:
The Supreme Court will end up giving Trump 62 more electoral votes when it declares the election if four states violated the Constitution and their own laws. Taking them away from Braindead China Joe.
Click to expand...

No! Your brain is just so full of DONALD TRUMP'S SHIT- you are incapable of having rational thought and just experiencing BRAIN FARTS NOW!

tenor.gif
 
coldjoint said:
I am not about to listen to anyone who thinks destroying this country is a good thing. You are one those people.
Click to expand...

You listened or you wouldn't have responded- SO YOU HEARD ME!

I have realized this, DONALD TRUMP IS SCUM AND SO IS EVERYONE OF YOU SORE LOSING MOTHER-FUCKERS WHO VOTED FOR HIM ARE TOO!
 
coldjoint said:
The day Biden takes office is the day they put the Statue of Liberty into a body bag. There goes the world's last chance at anything but misery.
Click to expand...

Really, as your whining baby, dear leader does nothing about covid but cry about his losing the election?
His idiot cult, following suit?
Dotard still has time to put the statue in a body bag, the moron will do anything to stay out of prison.
 
coldjoint said:
The Supreme Court will end up giving Trump 62 more electoral votes when it declares the election if four states violated the Constitution and their own laws. Taking them away from Braindead China Joe.
Click to expand...
Really?
The supreme court laughed Dotard's case out of court.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top