Byron York: Amid firestorms, Trump has year of solid policy accomplishments. Can he k

Ok. I wasn’t as busy as I thought. Looks like it is around $59,000 per year. Ok. Well, by myself I don’t make that much but with the missus we are just above that. I was just wondering.
 
the part he is too dishonest to tell you is the tax cuts expire in 5 years and taxes go up

No dipshit, they expire in 2025, not because of the bill, not because of Trump, and not because of the republicans, but because of Senate Budget rules, and if Republicans hold the Congress in 2025 they will be reinstated.
 
Let’s repeat, you illiterate fucktard.

Corporate rates are dropping and are permanent,

Yep, gonna be a great thing and bring us economic growth like we haven't seen since Reagan along with a Senate super majority in 2018.

but they never paid 35% to begin woth.

Which is irrelevant to the original point that I was addressing. Regardless: the U.S. has the highest statutory rate (39.1 percent), the third highest average effective tax rate (29 percent), and the fourth highest marginal effective tax rate (18.6 percent).


https://taxfoundation.org/cbo-report-compares-us-corporate-tax-g20/
What is a corporation? What the fuck do you think it is? If you’re saying “people”, you’re full of shit, since “people”


It's a collection of shareholders who the last time I checked are people.

are having their cuts phased out in a few years. Fucking idiot.

2025 is not a few years, and that has nothing to do with the bill, republicans, or Trump but with the Senate Budget rules, but I'm glad we can count on your support in 2025 to make the individual tax cuts permanent.

Wishful thinking on your part. Did you see the clip of that question posed to a room full of CEOs? Nary a one raised their hand when asked about wages or reinvestment. Thanks for not providing a single example to prove my point.

You had a point? So is it your assertion that economic growth does not result in increased wages, investment, and job growth?
 
Yep, gonna be a great thing and bring us economic growth like we haven't seen since Reagan along with a Senate super majority in 2018.



Which is irrelevant to the original point that I was addressing. Regardless: the U.S. has the highest statutory rate (39.1 percent), the third highest average effective tax rate (29 percent), and the fourth highest marginal effective tax rate (18.6 percent).


https://taxfoundation.org/cbo-report-compares-us-corporate-tax-g20/



It's a collection of shareholders who the last time I checked are people.



2025 is not a few years, and that has nothing to do with the bill, republicans, or Trump but with the Senate Budget rules, but I'm glad we can count on your support in 2025 to make the individual tax cuts permanent.



You had a point? So is it your assertion that economic growth does not result in increased wages, investment, and job growth?

I love your reference to Senate Budget Rules. Had to look into that. Yep, the Byrd Rule. What those rules mean is that you had to abide by them to avoid filibuster. Simple majority wins. So, individual rates go back up to cover the budget deficits and the Byrd Rule stands. Corporate rates remain cut.

The BILL contains the cuts I referred to, asswipe. The "rule" still allows the BILL to fuck the individual.

Pathetic that even a halfwit like you can't differentiate between an individual and a corporation.

My question to you, since you were to fucking stupid to understand it, was to provide historical examples where corporate profits lead to wage increases. Today is a perfect example, where corporate profits are at or near all time highs. Where's the beef, moron? A nothing burger.
 
Back
Top