California voter fraud, you can't catch what you ignore

T. A. Gardner

Serial Thread Killer
Seems California is rife with potential and actual voter fraud. The state all but ignores it too. When you do nothing about a serious problem it doesn't mean the problem doesn't exist...

After receiving six voter registration cards at her home of two residents, Yourex, as a lark, and to prove a point, successfully registered her dog Maya to vote






 
How have you concluded that it's a "serious problem?"
As one example, there was a 45,000 ballot discrepancy in voting in Orange County in a recent election. A potential 7% of the vote. That's serious.



 
Voter fraud in blue states is simply a wet dream of MAGA. The numbers and occurrences are less than meaningless, and just the fact that the once in a blue moon cases are caught and reported means the system is working. This won't stop them from thinking that the only reason they lose is because Democrats are cheating. Now, move on to the next toddler fuss issue.
 
As one example, there was a 45,000 ballot discrepancy in voting in Orange County in a recent election. A potential 7% of the vote. That's serious.




Did you read through both of those articles?
 
Voter fraud in blue states is simply a wet dream of MAGA. The numbers and occurrences are less than meaningless, and just the fact that the once in a blue moon cases are caught and reported means the system is working. This won't stop them from thinking that the only reason they lose is because Democrats are cheating. Now, move on to the next toddler fuss issue.
And in the vast vast majorly of voter fraud cases caught that get exposed they are in red states by Trump supporters., often working in election infrastructure.

So the pretense that if it is happening in any meaningful way that it delicate democrats benefitting is just false.
 
Did you read through both of those articles?
Yes. There is a discrepancy and there is potential for fraud to have occurred. That the state supreme court stopped the sheriff and has said they will, instead, look into it says there's at least something behind it. Now, it remains to be seen if the court will do anything or if they'll just sweep it under the rug...
 
And in the vast vast majorly of voter fraud cases caught that get exposed they are in red states by Trump supporters., often working in election infrastructure.
Not true in the least.


Peruse the list state by state.

That aside, you can't catch what you aren't looking for. It seems to me that blue, Democrat, states go out of their way to ignore potential and real voter fraud, just like they ignore other forms of fraud.
 
Did you read through both of those articles?
He never does.
I'll read them later but if you are betting the over under on Terry not only getting it wrong but the articles he posts refuting what he said you NEVER bet on Terry getting it correct.

I would estimate 8 of 10 times Terry gets it wrong and is refuted by what he posts.
 
Yes. There is a discrepancy and there is potential for fraud to have occurred. That the state supreme court stopped the sheriff and has said they will, instead, look into it says there's at least something behind it. Now, it remains to be seen if the court will do anything or if they'll just sweep it under the rug...

What was the discrepancy? Is there proof it was in the 10's of thousands?
 
Our elections get checked after each and every one. Our system is extremely good and the bad votes are minusule. That is a fact. Trump is the first person to claim widespread voter fraud. What does he know about the system? NOTHING. Yet rightys jumped aboard the stupid train and will not get off.
Trump claims mail-in is different. It is not. Mail- in go to the precinct the voter was assigned to. It is on his ballot. Once there, the signature is checked ,If it is all proper, then the vote is counted and the eligible voter is marked as voted. Note, there cannot be more than one vote for a person. If marked as voted, a new ballot with his name on it would get the police summoned.
A bunch of ballots dropped off would not be tallied because the name has to already be in the logbook.The Trumpys are lying.
 
Seems California is rife with potential and actual voter fraud. The state all but ignores it too. When you do nothing about a serious problem it doesn't mean the problem doesn't exist...

After receiving six voter registration cards at her home of two residents, Yourex, as a lark, and to prove a point, successfully registered her dog Maya to vote






Got to be always suspicious of “undercover videos,” but regardless, tell us how many of these exposed voters actually voted? and what effect numbers wise did they have on the outcome of the election involving them? Did the dog vote?

No one denies voter fraud exists, has always existed, long before Trump pimped it to cast doubt on elections so he can claim je was cheated. And the fact remains election fraud has never been proven to be anything but minimal with no documented proof it ever swayed any election
 
Got to be always suspicious of “undercover videos,” but regardless, tell us how many of these exposed voters actually voted? and what effect numbers wise did they have on the outcome of the election involving them? Did the dog vote?

Irrelevant. Fraudulent voter registration is a form of voter fraud. In the case of the dog, the woman who got it registered went to the state as a whistleblower and the state charged her with felonies instead. They didn't give a shit that a dog could be registered to vote or do anything about that. Instead, they wanted to shut the woman that made them look stupid and evil up.
No one denies voter fraud exists, has always existed, long before Trump pimped it to cast doubt on elections so he can claim je was cheated. And the fact remains election fraud has never been proven to be anything but minimal with no documented proof it ever swayed any election
Lack of proof doesn't mean it's not happening, particularly when you see fraud that allows for voters to criminally abuse the system without penalty.
 
Irrelevant. Fraudulent voter registration is a form of voter fraud. In the case of the dog, the woman who got it registered went to the state as a whistleblower and the state charged her with felonies instead. They didn't give a shit that a dog could be registered to vote or do anything about that. Instead, they wanted to shut the woman that made them look stupid and evil up.

Lack of proof doesn't mean it's not happening, particularly when you see fraud that allows for voters to criminally abuse the system without penalty.
Did the dog vote? No, proves my point, perfect example of voter fraud, existed, but meant little

Defies reason to spend time and energy prioritizing “problems” that do not exist, especially with so many real problems.

There’s no definitive proof the sun will rise tomorrow, but that doesn’t mean we should all plan and prepare if it doesn’t
 
Did the dog vote? No, proves my point, perfect example of voter fraud, existed, but meant little

The FACT that the dog was registered to vote is problematic. The DOG gets a mail in ballot. Who fills that ballot out is not known. The signature is valid because the person that registered the dog signed it. That's undetectable voter fraud.

If the dog had to vote "in person" that would be a problem. That would prevent the fraud.
Defies reason to spend time and energy prioritizing “problems” that do not exist, especially with so many real problems.

It defies reason to try and minimize and ignore such problems with voter registration and mail in ballot voting.
There’s no definitive proof the sun will rise tomorrow, but that doesn’t mean we should all plan and prepare if it doesn’t
Only if you are insanely stupid there isn't.
 
Seems California is rife with potential and actual voter fraud. The state all but ignores it too. When you do nothing about a serious problem it doesn't mean the problem doesn't exist...

After receiving six voter registration cards at her home of two residents, Yourex, as a lark, and to prove a point, successfully registered her dog Maya to vote






Exactly. If you don't look for fraud you probably are not going to find fraud.
 
The FACT that the dog was registered to vote is problematic. The DOG gets a mail in ballot. Who fills that ballot out is not known. The signature is valid because the person that registered the dog signed it. That's undetectable voter fraud.

If the dog had to vote "in person" that would be a problem. That would prevent the fraud.


It defies reason to try and minimize and ignore such problems with voter registration and mail in ballot voting.

Only if you are insanely stupid there isn't.
Has fraudulent registrations been discovered so rampant that it has swayed an election? As I said, voter fraud exists, always has existed, but the opportunity costs of spending time and money on a “problem” yet to be proven consequential is irrational
 
Back
Top