California voter fraud, you can't catch what you ignore

FastLane said:
Exactly. If you don't look for fraud you probably are not going to find fraud.
Click to expand...
T. A. Gardner said:
The FACT that the dog was registered to vote is problematic. The DOG gets a mail in ballot. Who fills that ballot out is not known. The signature is valid because the person that registered the dog signed it. That's undetectable voter fraud.

If the dog had to vote "in person" that would be a problem. That would prevent the fraud.


It defies reason to try and minimize and ignore such problems with voter registration and mail in ballot voting.

Only if you are insanely stupid there isn't.
Click to expand...
You guys are aware voter fraud, impersonation fraud happens with in person voting right?

So I guess we need to get rid of that too.
 
archives said:
Has fraudulent registrations been discovered so rampant that it has swayed an election? As I said, voter fraud exists, always has existed, but the opportunity costs of spending time and money on a “problem” yet to be proven consequential is irrational
Click to expand...
If the state isn't looking for it, is even actively trying to prevent it being found, what do you think?
 
QP! said:
You guys are aware voter fraud, impersonation fraud happens with in person voting right?

So I guess we need to get rid of that too.
Click to expand...
It's a damn sight harder. You sure as hell can't bring your dog to a polling location and get it allowed to vote there...
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It's a damn sight harder. You sure as hell can't bring your dog to a polling location and get it allowed to vote there...
Click to expand...
Doesn't matter. It's hard to cheat in any meaningful way via mail in.

So in person should be scrapped as their is meaningless fraud there too.
 
QP! said:
Doesn't matter. It's hard to cheat in any meaningful way via mail in.

So in person should be scrapped as their is meaningless fraud there too.
Click to expand...
It does matter. If the public perception of elections and voting is that there's fraud and cheating going on, whether there is or not those people lose faith in the system. If they see fraud and then see that government is doing nothing about it, that's the same problem.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
It does matter. If the public perception of elections and voting is that there's fraud and cheating going on, whether there is or not those people lose faith in the system. If they see fraud and then see that government is doing nothing about it, that's the same problem.
Click to expand...
Funny how perception changed since Trump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top