I don't think so. Would you care to elaborate please.
Dr.King was antiwar .. I mean truly anti-war, not just antiwar for convienence and political position. Dr. King would have opposed the invasion of Iraq AND the invasion of Afghanistan AND the senseless murder of innocent Pakistanis.
Dr. King stood up for and spoke for the poor of every race. On the issue of poverty and the poor, John Edwards is a much closer comparison to King than Obama.
Dr. King was a fighter who risked his life, and it cost him his life, as he stood FIRMLY on principle and conviction.
Obama is a slick centrist politician from Chicago who has disdain for civil rights leaders .. thus doesn't include ANY of them in his plans and doesn't have ANY of them around him, even though they are far more responsible for his rise to glory than the mountain of Jewish politicians and operatives he's surrounded in.
Without Jesse Jackson, there would be no Obama as the president because it was Jackson who brought proportional representation to the democrats .. without which, Hillary would be the president.
King would have oppossed Obama on war, the influence of money and corporations, and his priorities of lots of money for rich corporations, lots of money and an increased budget for the military industrial complex ..
even though a Pentagoin group said the military budget should be slashed .. yet, cut entitlements to the most needy Americans in a crisis .. and King would have oppossed Obama's belief that American children belong in the military.