Case closed: No evidence of Russian collusion found.

Stretch said:
Are you high? Did you not just say that "Obama did plenty?" To which I gave a direct response???
Click to expand...
I told you to do a google search and you would learn exactly what President Obama did in regard to the Russian election interference. Short of that i would just assume that your mind is made up and no one should confuse you with the facts.
 
floridafan said:
I told you to do a google search and you would learn exactly what President Obama did in regard to the Russian election interference. Short of that i would just assume that your mind is made up and no one should confuse you with the facts.
Click to expand...



Lol. Total pimp slap.
 
domer76 said:
You left out a couple more, cretin.

(ii) any matters that arose or may arise directly om the investigation; and
(iii) any other matters within the scope of 28 C.F.R. § 600.4(a).
Click to expand...

Exactly lol!

Since the Trump/Russia collusion is a dry hole, why doesn’t Mueller snoop around Russian involvement with Clinton/DNC and the Russian Dossier? It involves Russia AND the election and it ‘arises directly from the investigation’.

I’ll tell you why he won’t. His investigation is a partisan witch hunt.

In fact, Mueller’s apparent refusal to not fulfill his mandate provides the basis for someone that will—a second SP from outside the Beltway.
 
floridafan said:
I told you to do a google search and you would learn exactly what President Obama did in regard to the Russian election interference. Short of that i would just assume that your mind is made up and no one should confuse you with the facts.
Click to expand...

Obama thought it was ridiculous that Russian is hacking........

 
Darth Omar said:
Exactly lol!

Since the Trump/Russia collusion is a dry hole, why doesn’t Mueller snoop around Russian involvement with Clinton/DNC and the Russian Dossier? It involves Russia AND the election and it ‘arises directly from the investigation’.

I’ll tell you why he won’t. His investigation is a partisan witch hunt.

In fact, Mueller’s apparent refusal to not fulfill his mandate provides the basis for someone that will—a second SP from outside the Beltway.
Click to expand...

He’s too busy looking at the REAL crooks to get sidetracked with a legitimate dossier.

Nice try, pally
 
domer76 said:
He’s too busy looking at the REAL crooks to get sidetracked with a legitimate dossier.

Nice try, pally
Click to expand...

Too busy lol. Actually, I’m not sure Mueller could investigate it without recusing himself.

So, the Russian Dossier is legitimate because they say it is? I thought colluding with Russians to affect an election was a big no-no.
 
Darth Omar said:
Exactly lol!

Since the Trump/Russia collusion is a dry hole, why doesn’t Mueller snoop around Russian involvement with Clinton/DNC and the Russian Dossier? It involves Russia AND the election and it ‘arises directly from the investigation’.

I’ll tell you why he won’t. His investigation is a partisan witch hunt.

In fact, Mueller’s apparent refusal to not fulfill his mandate provides the basis for someone that will—a second SP from outside the Beltway.
Click to expand...

How stupid. Mueller is a lifetime Republican. The Repubs are in control of all 3 branches of govt. So if it is partisan, it is Repub party partisan.
 
[h=1]Phil Mudd on House report "I wouldn't wipe my ass with it!"[/h]‘I wouldn’t wipe my ass with it’: Ex-CIA analyst rips House GOP intel committee’s ‘no collusion’ report

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/03/wo...gop-intel-committees-no-collusion-report/amp/

CNN’s Phil Mudd on Monday had a remarkable reaction...

“Their responsibility was not to represent party, Democrat or Republican, but to represent people,” Mudd said. “How do we protect the next election? The last 30 minutes, Wolf––you give me one sentence where somebody spoke about how they’re going to protect us instead of saying this is why the other party did something wrong.”

“If this report were written on toilet paper, I wouldn’t stoop to wipe my ass with it,” he continued. “These people owe us more. They gave us less. That’s what I see, Wolf.”
 
Bourbon said:
[h=1]Phil Mudd on House report "I wouldn't wipe my ass with it!"[/h]‘I wouldn’t wipe my ass with it’: Ex-CIA analyst rips House GOP intel committee’s ‘no collusion’ report

https://www.rawstory.com/2018/03/wo...gop-intel-committees-no-collusion-report/amp/

CNN’s Phil Mudd on Monday had a remarkable reaction...

“Their responsibility was not to represent party, Democrat or Republican, but to represent people,” Mudd said. “How do we protect the next election? The last 30 minutes, Wolf––you give me one sentence where somebody spoke about how they’re going to protect us instead of saying this is why the other party did something wrong.”

“If this report were written on toilet paper, I wouldn’t stoop to wipe my ass with it,” he continued. “These people owe us more. They gave us less. That’s what I see, Wolf.”
Click to expand...

Guess 73 witnesses interviewed & 300,000 documents weren't enough. :)
 
Stretch said:
Guess 73 witnesses interviewed & 300,000 documents weren't enough. :)
Click to expand...


Let me know when you're done chewing on this ... I have more to stuff in your face.

29906170001_5004242046001_5004213405001-vs.jpg
29906170001_5004242046001_5004213405001-vs.jpg
29906170001_5004242046001_5004213405001-vs.jpg
1467149289_41272366_ver1.0_640_480.jpg
 
Darth Omar said:
Exactly lol!

Since the Trump/Russia collusion is a dry hole, why doesn’t Mueller snoop around Russian involvement with Clinton/DNC and the Russian Dossier? It involves Russia AND the election and it ‘arises directly from the investigation’.

I’ll tell you why he won’t. His investigation is a partisan witch hunt.

In fact, Mueller’s apparent refusal to not fulfill his mandate provides the basis for someone that will—a second SP from outside the Beltway.
Click to expand...

Trump tried to obstruct justice or had you forgotten? Maybe Putin has the pee tapes.
 
Nordberg said:
Not correct. Mueller has an open investigation like Starr did. He can go wherever it leads him. It is most likely concentrating on money laundering . Bannon said that is where Trump is vulnerable.
Click to expand...
listen to yourself..justifying a fishing expedition because Ken Starr did it.
Ken starr's expedition was so bad,Congress got rid of special prosecuotors -why are you giving Mueller a pass for the same?
Can't you criticize both? I do.
 
[h=1]GOP Rep. Tom Rooney Breaks Ranks On Russia Report: 'We've Lost All Credibility'[/h]'A GOP member of the House Intelligence Committee is breaking ranks with his fellow Republicans over a contentious report released Monday on Russian interference in the 2016 election and possible ties to the campaign of Donald Trump.

Rep. Tom Rooney (R-Fla.) told CNN that “there is evidence” the Russians worked to help Trump.

“I don’t know that necessarily there was a full-fledged campaign to do everything that they could to help elect Donald Trump,” he added. “I think that their goal was chaos.” . .

However, he also justified ending the committee’s investigation.

“We’ve gone completely off the rails, and now we’re just basically a political forum for people to leak information to drive the day’s news,” Rooney said. “We’ve lost all credibility, and we’re going to issue probably two different reports, unfortunately.”

He was referring to the likelihood that the committee’s Democratic members will issue their own report challenging the findings.>>>

https://www.yahoo.com/news/gop-lawmaker-tom-rooney-breaks-024448785.html?.tsrc=fauxdal
 
Nordberg said:
How stupid. Mueller is a lifetime Republican. The Repubs are in control of all 3 branches of govt. So if it is partisan, it is Repub party partisan.
Click to expand...

Mueller may be republican but he loaded his team with Clinton donors.

In either event, the R in front of his name means nothing. What matters is that his mandate doesn’t prevent him from looking at Russian interference from the DNC/Clinton side.

In a more perfect world, Rosenstein would call Mueller and say ‘listen Bud, we didn’t hire you to just go after Trump. If Hillary and the DNC colluded with Russians via an intermediary before the election, I want it investigated. Read your damn mandate.’

But it’s not working that way. The whole thing is incestuous, corrupt, and represents a much bigger problem than the Russians do.
 
Darth Omar said:
Too busy lol. Actually, I’m not sure Mueller could investigate it without recusing himself.

So, the Russian Dossier is legitimate because they say it is? I thought colluding with Russians to affect an election was a big no-no.
Click to expand...

Let’s see.

The DNC/campaign hired a law firm, who then hired a second firm (that had already been hired by Republicans), who then hired a Russian intelligence expert, who found a bunch of shit that corroborated what was already known by the intelligence community.

That’s collusion.

But a meeting in Trump Tower by Orangetweet’s kid, his campaign manager and son-in-law, DIRECTLY with Russians for the EXPRESS purpose of getting dirt on Clinton is not collusion.

lol

Desperate delusional clown.
 
domer76 said:
Let’s see.

The DNC/campaign hired a law firm, who then hired a second firm (that had already been hired by Republicans), who then hired a Russian intelligence expert, who found a bunch of shit that corroborated what was already known by the intelligence community.

That’s collusion.

But a meeting in Trump Tower by Orangetweet’s kid, his campaign manager and son-in-law, DIRECTLY with Russians for the EXPRESS purpose of getting dirt on Clinton is not collusion.

lol

Desperate delusional clown.
Click to expand...


You keep leaving out the part where a Republicans Hired him FIRST! :laugh:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top