Catholic school vice principal dismissed for being in gay "marriage"

Should religious schools be allowed to fire gays?

  • Is the Pope Catholic?

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • No, the federal government should step in

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, it's discrimination; the school should lose tax-exempt status

    Votes: 1 33.3%
  • So what if a teacher is gay? What could happen?

    Votes: 1 33.3%

  • Total voters
    3
  • Poll closed .
Since when does an American law enforcement agency get to decide for the world the definition of sexual behavior?

Besides, I'd like to see a link that says as much.

And if the Des Moines, Iowa Police Department disagreed, would that matter much either?

They don't decide for the world. But they are the authority on criminal behavior in this country. And they DO make a distinction between pedophile and gay.
 
No, it is not. The arbitrary line we have drawn, the age 18, is not the deciding factor in whether or not the perp is gay.

Nobody said it was, did they?

What makes a "perp" gay? Is it engaging in sex with another male?

I'm interested in learning what Y O U think, not the FBI.
 
Most gay men are attracted to other gay men.

Most? You have a cite for that?

What do you call gay men who have sex with boys? Are they pedophiles, or gay pedophiles?

As for pedophiles, the answer is more complicated than simply looking at the gender of the participants.

Same-sex sex is homosexual, regardless of the ages of the participants, isn't it?

Is the victim in the crimes gay?

Excellent question. If they are, is the perpetrator also gay?

I kinda doubt that.

So?
 
Most? You have a cite for that?

What do you call gay men who have sex with boys? Are they pedophiles, or gay pedophiles?



Same-sex sex is homosexual, regardless of the ages of the participants, isn't it?



Excellent question. If they are, is the perpetrator also gay?



So?

My explanation of why these child molester are not necessarily gay should have been clear enough.

As I said at the beginning of that explanation, I have no intention of making that a topic of discussion. If you need for me to tell you whether they are gay or not, then you are not bright enough to be in the discussion. You already have your own opinion and I have stated mine.


Now, back to the OP. I say put child molesters away. If the victim was under a certain age (prepubescent), they need to go away for life.
 
Since when does an American law enforcement agency get to decide for the world the definition of sexual behavior?

Besides, I'd like to see a link that says as much.

And if the Des Moines, Iowa Police Department disagreed, would that matter much either?
of course the answer is obvious......a male who is sexually attracted to a fifteen year old girl is not a pedophile.....why would the answer be different for a gay?......
 
My explanation of why these child molester are not necessarily gay should have been clear enough.

So you contend that heterosexuals seek out same-sex children to molest?

As I said at the beginning of that explanation, I have no intention of making that a topic of discussion. If you need for me to tell you whether they are gay or not, then you are not bright enough to be in the discussion. You already have your own opinion and I have stated mine.

I don't recall expressing an opinion. Your opinion seems at odds with the facts, doesn't it?

If the victim was under a certain age (prepubescent), they need to go away for life.

Earlier you seemed to be saying sex with post-pubescent minors could not be defined by age. Is there a WB-approved age of pubescence?
 
of course the answer is obvious......a male who is sexually attracted to a fifteen year old girl is not a pedophile.....why would the answer be different for a gay?......

Good questions. WB says if you need for him to tell you whether they are gay or not, then you are not bright enough to be in the discussion.
 
So you contend that heterosexuals seek out same-sex children to molest?

No, I contend that pedophiles seek out children to molest. You are the one who seems obsessed by the sexual orientation of the molester. Is it better for the victim if they are molested by the opposite gender? Does the gender of the molester have any bearing on it at all?

Earlier you seemed to be saying sex with post-pubescent minors could not be defined by age. Is there a WB-approved age of pubescence?

I do not "seem" to be saying that. I am saying that. There is no age at which puberty hits in every male child.
 
of course the answer is obvious......a male who is sexually attracted to a fifteen year old girl is not a pedophile.....why would the answer be different for a gay?......

Therein lies the main point. Being attracted to an underage girl or boy, who looks like an adult is not the same as being sexually attracted to a prepubescent child.
 
So long as they don't get government cash to run their school they get to do what they please. If they do receive government money though this will only end badly for them.
 
Therein lies the main point. Being attracted to an underage girl or boy, who looks like an adult is not the same as being sexually attracted to a prepubescent child.

The easiest way to point this out to them is to simply point out that when a man does it to a little girl they aren't trying to say it is heterosexual. It's pedophilia, an entirely different thing than either of those.
 
Therein lies the main point. Being attracted to an underage girl or boy, who looks like an adult is not the same as being sexually attracted to a prepubescent child.

So if the boy is hot, the male molester is gay, not a pedophile?

And didn't you say there is no easily-defined age?
 
The easiest way to point this out to them is to simply point out that when a man does it to a little girl they aren't trying to say it is heterosexual. It's pedophilia, an entirely different thing than either of those.


If a molester assaults a minor of the opposite sex, it isn't heterosexual?
 
Back
Top