/MSG/
Uwaa OmO
Holy shit, until the eighties Ireland was a bloody awful shithole with no jobs, run by priests and bloody parish pump politicians like the fecker Charles Haughey.
I'll think you'll want this back...
Holy shit, until the eighties Ireland was a bloody awful shithole with no jobs, run by priests and bloody parish pump politicians like the fecker Charles Haughey.
Does that make up for the preceding 600 years or so?
I'll think you'll want this back...
There is not much. or indeed probably anything, that you could tell me about Irish history. Holy shit. my parents came from Ireland, they sent me to a primary school run by Irish nuns and I was brought with the stories of the Black and Tans, fucking De Valera et al. I have also travelled around all Ireland both North and South, what about you?
Tom, do you know what Americans call the Welsh? English! Good job wiping them out, subjugating them, and making them irrelevant.
The sheep were cheeky!
There is not much. or indeed probably anything, that you could tell me about Irish history. Holy shit. my parents came from Ireland, they sent me to a primary school run by Irish nuns and I was brought with the stories of the Black and Tans, fucking De Valera et al. I have also travelled around all Ireland both North and South, what about you?
It that meant to be piss or lager?
And yet, here you are, vast knowledge of Irish history in your posession, essentially arguing that the English did nothing wrong. Is this how you sum up English history in India, as well? Honestly, I was just trolling about the Welsh. It's pretty common to joke about how the Scots and Irish remain clearly identifiable (and defiant) while the Welsh got assimilated and disappeared, just because Americans tend not to really care about (or understand) the Welsh. Best example I can think of is the movie The Replacements, where the (American) football team acquires a Welsh kicker (from world football) and someone mistakenly calls him "English," and he has to protest a bit.
I suppose you wouldn't know the difference between the two.
Well I didn't say that either, the trouble is that the Irish are incredibly adept at generating myths and selling them to gullible Americans. I was watching the Quiet Man the other day, some of which was filmed near where my dad was born in Mayo, and it seemed to me to have just about every cliche about the Irish in it, even down to the Oirish accents of Barry Fitzgerald, John Wayne, Maureen O'Hara and Ward Bond. Don't get me wrong I like the film for all that, not least because they filmed it on location rather than in a Hollywood studio.
As far as India is concerned yes I would say that the British had a profoundly positive effect on India, especially compared to the Spanish, French, Dutch, Belgians, Portuguese and German colonists. How many functioning democracies did the Spanish leave behind in South America or the French in Indo-China?
What's does American lager and making love in a punt have in common?
They are both fucking close to water
Quiet Man is one of my all-time favorite movies (Wayne was an American character, so no Irish accent, there). As for the other colonial powers, it's true that British colonialism has been vastly more successful (USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, and even India). That still doesn't change the fact that in places such as Ireland and India they murdered countless people and oppressed the populations for many generations.
Quiet Man is one of my all-time favorite movies (Wayne was an American character, so no Irish accent, there). As for the other colonial powers, it's true that British colonialism has been vastly more successful (USA, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Hong Kong, and even India). That still doesn't change the fact that in places such as Ireland and India they murdered countless people and oppressed the populations for many generations.
Also, they got an entire country addicted to Opium. And the Boer Wars. And Rhodesia.
Massacre of Amritsar: (April 13, 1919), incident in which British troops fired on a crowd of unarmed Indian protesters, killing a large number.
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/21847/Massacre-of-Amritsar
The Siege of Drogheda took place on 3–11 September 1649 at the outset of the Cromwellian conquest of Ireland. The town of Drogheda in eastern Ireland was held by the Irish Catholic Confederation and English Royalists when it was besieged and stormed by English Parliamentarian forces under Oliver Cromwell. In the aftermath of the assault, much of the garrison and an unknown but "significant number" of civilians were killed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Drogheda
Well done sonny, so you found Amritsar. Well I've been there.
Did the locals spit on you?