CEO pay jumps 36.5 (Wow!)

signalmankenneth

Verified User
ceo-pay.ju.top.jpg


NEW YORK (CNNMoney) -- Who says American salaries are stagnating.

After two years of lower pay packages, chief executives at the nation's major companies enjoyed a 36.5% jump in pay last year, according to a leading survey of CEO compensation.

The average pay hike is for the top executive at each of the Standard & Poor 500 companies, according to GMI, the research group formerly known as the Corporate Library. A broader survey of CEO pay at 3,000 companies posted an average 27% increase.


Paul Hodgson, senior research associate at GMI, said the sharp rise in pay was out of line with the relatively modest improvement that companies typically achieved in profits or share price during 2010.


The most lucrative sector for CEO pay was health care, which included three of the nine top-paid executives, including the two most lucrative packages:



$145 million for John Hammergen of McKesson Corp. (MCK, Fortune 500), which distributes drugs and health and beauty care products to pharmacies; and $98 million for Joel Gemunder, who retired in July 2010 as CEO of Omnicare (OCR, Fortune 500), which provides drugs to nursing homes and other long-term care facilities.

Top paid CEOs

Both companies, in public filings, actually reported lower pay packages for the two executives. McKesson listed Hammergen's total compensation package as $46.1 million for the most recent fiscal year, while Omnicare listed Gemunder's pay package at $32.8 million.


Neither company returned calls seeking comment.


But GMI's analysis adds up total "realized pay" -- which includes not just salary, bonus and the estimated value of stock options granted, but also the value of profits from exercising those options and pension payments. Those items are not typically included in the reports companies file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


GMI also said Hammergen exercised more than 3.3 million stock options during the year, netting him $112 million. His retirement benefits also grew in value by $13.5 million. And, GMI added, his severance package would be worth $469 million if he were fired.


Gemunder also benefited from a large exit package that wasn't included in the company's listing, as did two of the other executives who made GMI's top 10 list.
greedy+CEOs.png

Pumped-CEOs.JPG


greed.jpg
 
Don't wage class warfare.

CEOs are job creators, and they pay most of the taxes, don't they?

It's not as if they asked taxpayers to bail them out or anything.
 
As a pro stock market as any righty. Here's where my hardcore democrat kicks in. I agree; I think CEO's and board members are the embodiment of the good ole boys club. they scratch each others backs. Often overlooked Board members get $250,000 A year to go to a few meeting kiss the CEO's ass and approve his salary. Nice job if you can get it.
I say don't allow tax deductibility for CEO pay or board pay. Max it at double the amount subject to ss tax.
 
Last edited:
As a pro stock market as any righty. Here's where my hardcore democrat kicks in. I agree; I think CEO's and board members are the embodiment of the good ole boys club. they scratch each others backs. Often overlooked Borg members get $250,000 A year to go to a few meeting kiss the CEO's ass and approve his salary. Nice job if you can get it.
I say don't allow tax deductibility for CEO pay or board pay. Max it at double the amount subject to ss tax.
Word. As a stock holder it's just fucking infuriating when it's announced that the company you invested in won't be paying dividends this year due to economic down turn, even though profits were up but then you hear the CEO got a $25 million dollar bonus. Makes you want to fucking scream. We desperately need corporate reform to make CEO's/Board of directors more accountable to stock holders.
 
The corporate executives who helped bring on the recession of the past three years—whose contribution to our society, and to their own companies, has been massively negative—went on to receive large bonuses.

In some cases, companies were so embarrassed about calling such rewards “performance bonuses” that they felt compelled to change the name to “retention bonuses” (even if the only thing being retained was bad performance).

Those who have contributed great positive innovations to our society, from the pioneers of genetic understanding to the pioneers of the Information Age, have received a pittance compared with those responsible for the financial innovations that brought our global economy to the brink of ruin.


128685670236903457.jpg




http://www.vanityfair.com/society/features/2011/05/top-one-percent-201105
 
Back
Top