Chants of "Shame!" at Trump's Crypto Dinner

martin said:
You sound like your period has gotten the better of you.
Click to expand...
No, I'm not a libtard who believes I can have a period. You poor bastard, they've got you so confused. You're just another victim of the libtard virus.

After I stopped laughing at the morons you think are doing important work shouting "Shame!" I provided an accurate assessment of the real impact they're having. As usual, you had no idea how to respond other than doing your best at an insult with a touch of humor......., I think.

Just curious, are you in this picture? Do you notice anything about the people there? I suspect you'd blend right in, lol. Keep it up, the Republican party is growing every day.

dumbass libtards.jpg
 
  • Haha
Reactions: TOP
martin said:
Presidents are forbidden to enrich themselves in schemes such as this. Trump's answer is that he is not personally involved because whatever money is made goes into a blind trust. Turns out the trustees of this "blind" trust are Don, Jr. and Eric.
Click to expand...
Two things have come out of that Crypto Dinner scam;

1. The sales pitch didn't match the results: https://fortune.com/crypto/2025/05/23/trump-memecoin-dinner-nicholas-pinto-bad-food/

Influencer who attended Trump’s memecoin dinner says he got a ‘Walmart steak’—and no access to the president​

Nicholas Pinto, a 25-year-old social media influencer, accumulated more than $360,000 in President Donald Trump’s cryptocurrency to attend an “unforgettable Gala DINNER” with the commander-in-chief. The food, though, was forgettable. “Trash,” Pinto texted Fortune during the banquet. “Walmart steak, man.”

The menu included a “Trump organic field green salad” and an “entrée duet” of filet mignon and pan-seared halibut. “Everyone at my table was saying the food was some of the worst food that they ever had,” said Pinto after the meal....

...Was the price tag worth it? “I was hoping for either Big Macs or pizza,” Pinto said, referring to the president’s well-known taste for McDonald’s. “That would have been better than the food that we were served.”

2. Trump may have opened himself up for prosecution: https://www.rawstory.com/trump-immunity-2672194246/

White House claim puts Trump 'potentially outside the immunity shield': attorney​

An attempt by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt to blow off ethical and legal concerns about Donald Trump's crypto dinner on Thursday night might come back to haunt her boss.

Thursday afternoon Leavitt lectured reporters in the Brady Briefing Room about the dinner which was to include foreign investors at a Donald Trump golf resort in Virginia, telling NBC's Garrett Haake, "Well, as you know, Garrett, this question has been raised with the president. I have also addressed the dinner tonight. The president is attending it in his personal time. It is not a White House dinner, it’s not taking place here at the White House. But certainly I can raise that question and try to get you an answer for it."

Leavitt's claim of "personal time" caught the ear of multiple Trump critics....

...Conservative lawyer and ardent Trump opponent George Conway took the next step and suggested, "Actually, it’s fine. If Trump is saying he’s doing something on his 'personal time,' then obviously that means he’s not acting within what the Supreme Court calls 'the outer perimeter of his official responsibility,' which, in turn, means he’s not immune from criminal prosecution."

With Conway referencing the conservative Supreme Court's 2024 ruling that Trump and presidents who follow him are absolved of criminality if they are engaged in "official acts" as president, California attorney Tracey Gallagher also pounced on X.

"If Trump claims he’s acting on his 'personal time,' he’s likely implying he’s not operating in an official capacity as president," she asserted. "The Supreme Court, in cases like Trump v. United States (2024), distinguishes between official acts (within the president’s constitutional authority) and unofficial acts (personal conduct outside that scope). Official acts may carry immunity from criminal prosecution, while unofficial acts generally don’t. So, by framing something as 'personal time,' he’s suggesting it’s an unofficial act, potentially outside the immunity shield."
 
Nixon was creamed for taking a dog. He gave the famous "Checkers speech, "defending himself saying he would not give the dog back.
Ike's Chief of Staff was nailed for taking a Vicuna coat and a rug. Ike fought to save his job.
Now that the pressure on taking gifts and graft is gone. At least as long as Trump is in the office.
The Kleptocracy is alive and well.
 
Walt said:
I almost think they want to desensitize us to the criminality. They are committing worse crimes in the open then they ever accused Biden of doing.
Click to expand...
Which appears to be the strategy from the start; accuse your enemies of doing something to justify doing it yourself.

Without a balanced government, those in power will continue to push the limits of excess as the history of dictators always proves.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Which appears to be the strategy from the start; accuse your enemies of doing something to justify doing it yourself.

Without a balanced government, those in power will continue to push the limits of excess as the history of dictators always proves.
Click to expand...
Yep it is the old thing make people look over here while they do the same or worse over there.
It seem they have gotten really good at making their MAGA followers do it.
 
Tbird19482 said:
Yep it is the old thing make people look over here while they do the same or worse over there.
It seem they have gotten really good at making their MAGA followers do it.
Click to expand...
MAGAts are poorly educated, weak-willed and not that bright to begin with.

What mature American needs a daddy to fix their life for them?
 
Dutch Uncle said:
MAGAts are poorly educated, weak-willed and not that bright to begin with.

What mature American needs a daddy to fix their life for them?
Click to expand...
And the one they chose to put in the W.H. now isn't doing it.
He is just making things worse.
And when everything is said and done they will realize they got what they voted for now we all have to put up with Trumps BS. ( IF they ever do )
A lot of them are already having remorse for voting for him.
You see it in the news almost everyday now MAGAS crying " I didn't vote for this "
Well it is too late they got what they wanted now we all have to suffer.
 
Tbird19482 said:
And the one they chose to put in the W.H. now isn't doing it.
He is just making things worse.
And when everything is said and done they will realize they got what they voted for now we all have to put up with Trumps BS. ( IF they ever do )
A lot of them are already having remorse for voting for him.
You see it in the news almost everyday now MAGAS crying " I didn't vote for this "
Well it is too late they got what they wanted now we all have to suffer.
Click to expand...
You seem think their Trumpism is a reasoned choice. It is an emotional decision based on "owning" the left and an inability to resist a con man. That is why they respond emotionally. In a sense, judging Trump is judging them.
 
Nordberg said:
You seem think their Trumpism is a reasoned choice. It is an emotional decision based on "owning" the left and an inability to resist a con man. That is why they respond emotionally. In a sense, judging Trump is judging them.
Click to expand...
Never said or thought that MAGAS even have half a brain in order to reason anything.
They are so stupid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top