Charlie Kirk, hate speech is constitutionally protected!

It depends on how directly it leads to violence. Generally I do not because it should not be a crime due to the First Amendment. Chanting, "kill him", in a street fight... maybe. Saying "The right are fascist", no.
Here comes the flailing and deflecting. When leftist hacks are confronted with facts, they engage in deflecting, flailing and more lies. :palm:
 
The Right jumped on CANCEL CULTURE with both feet and a few extra limbs to boot.

Wrong. People with brains did. That would exclude a mentally challenged halfwit like you. :palm:

It was against Government controlling speech you brainless dumb fuck.

For all the guff the Left takes about Cancel Culture, it actually required the Right to make it ironic and bizarre.

That's another brainless lie. :palm:

The fact that they want to limit free speech over the death of a free speech advocate tells you all you need to know: they don't care about Charlie. They just needed a Horst Wessel and any would do.

No one is trying to limit free speech except loons on the left like you.

Their actions are the most disrespectful thing they could do with regards to Charlie.

You just described yourself and the loons on the left. But alas, stupid people like you don't even know they are stupid. :palm:
 
The coin has flipped again. Suddenly "hate speech" is something the right is saying and the left suddenly wants to have Free Speech upheld.

"Hate speech" is not something you can prosecute over and stay within the due bounds of the Constitution. However, when I watched the Bondi interview she had a sentence which is removed and stated "when it crosses the line into threats"...

Threatening folks with violence is already illegal, I would support prosecution over that.

Saying "reichwing" or "leftreich" is not a threat and should not be prosecuted.

I support free speech. Consequences of Free Speech come from the private sector, the government should have no dog in that hunt.
:thumbsup:
 
The right is trying to make a saint out of that racist hater. Kirk was terrible. I do not believe in shooting people you do not like. I do not know how the shooter justifies such a heinous act.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QP!
The right is trying to make a saint out of that racist hater. Kirk was terrible. I do not believe in shooting people you do not like. I do not know how the shooter justifies such a heinous act.

I think the shooter justifies in the same way Kirk has and would if he was alive and someone beside him on that stage had died instead.

Kirk was very pro people dying by this method regardless of innocence and even if they were a kid.
 
Low grade machine gun triggered posting
mentally-ill-spongebob-meme.gif


GuAno
Noun
gua·no | \ ˈgwä-(ˌ)nō

: a fertilizer containing the accumulated excrement of seabirds or bats broadly
: excrement especially of seabirds or bats
: Bird shit
 
The right is trying to make a saint out of that racist hater. Kirk was terrible. I do not believe in shooting people you do not like. I do not know how the shooter justifies such a heinous act.
Unhinged lies. I don't think you can post without lying and looking mentally ill. :palm:
 
I think the shooter justifies in the same way Kirk has and would if he was alive and someone beside him on that stage had died instead.

Kirk was very pro people dying by this method regardless of innocence and even if they were a kid.
You never "think" you brainless unhinged leftist loon. You emote brainless bullshit and spam this forum with it. :palm:
 
Protected by the first ament….

Pam Bondi - anyone using hate speech against Charlie Kirk will be prosecuted.
But its not protected while at work on the job!
So what he said was not protected !!!


Does a secretary in a Law Office have the right to call someone a Nigger cock sucking SOB and not expect to get fired because of free speech?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top