Chicken Hawk Down.....

You should actually read it yourself. You clearly do not know what it said. Just because he said the words 'terrorist act' in the speech did not mean he was calling the embassy attack in Libya an act of terrorism. EVERYTHING his admin stated in the two weeks after the attack showed they did not think it was an act of terrorism, but rather a protest over a video. He even stated that in the very same speech you obviously haven't read.

Here is Candy saying Romney was correct...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...owley_romney_was_actually_right_on_libya.html

There is absolutely no change in what she said in that video and during the debate.
 
There is absolutely no change in what she said in that video and during the debate.

And there is also no difference in saying something is an "act of terror" and the State Department officially calling it a "terrorist attack." Acts of terror happen all the time that aren't orchestrated terrorist attacks by terrorist organizations. Why are we having to explain this to you people like you are three years old?
 
Robmomey alos LIED and said that Obama appologised to the terrorists.


sociopathic lying

you should read the transcript...."We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others.".......pretending the terrorist attack was a response to denigrating the religious beliefs of others......
 
“So [Romney] was right in the main. I just think he picked the wrong word.”....Candy Crowley
 
you won't read the fucking transcript.....it's been provided to you and you still deny it.....

She quoted it correctly.

...

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.

...

He says "acts of terror" and immediately followed with a reference to the four deaths.
 
They have spent months telling each other that Obama apologized for America, prostrated himself before foreign potentates and didn't call the attacks terrorism...and they believed it so much that Romney thought he had Obama by the toe (yes that's a reference)...now they have to cry themselves to sleep like small children.
 
She quoted it correctly.

...

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.

...

He says "acts of terror" and immediately followed with a reference to the four deaths.

Exactly. What the hell else could he have been talking about.
 
And there is also no difference in saying something is an "act of terror" and the State Department officially calling it a "terrorist attack." Acts of terror happen all the time that aren't orchestrated terrorist attacks by terrorist organizations. Why are we having to explain this to you people like we are three years old?

Because Romney failed to make his point?

I still don't even get why you think it matters. It's not like they used a report they knew had been discredited a year prior to draw us into a war. What is different because they were not sure about whether it was premeditated or not and by whom?
 
Obama called the act an act of terror and she says it right in that tape.

Robmoney LIED

He didn't. He mentioned "acts of terror" but then described this as a protest that got out of hand. Reality is not meshing with the song in your head. He then sent out Susan Rice to play that same protest over a movie trailer theme out further... It took two weeks before he would admit that there was no protest, and this was a large scale attack by a terrorist organization that this Administration has proclaimed could no longer stage a large scale attack.
 
Exactly. What the hell else could he have been talking about.


The fact is, he, AND his Administration denied its was a terrorist attack for the next two weeks..........


September 12 --
White House spokesman Jay Carney, in response to questions about whether the attack was planned:
"It's too early for us to make that judgment.

September 13 --
Jay Carney:
"The protests we're seeing around the region are in reaction to this movie.
September 13 --
State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland:
Refused to call it terrorism...

"So I know that's going to be frustrating for you, but we really want to make sure that we do this right and we don't jump to conclusions."
September 14 -- Jay Carney:
"We were not aware of any actionable intelligence indicating that an attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi was planned or imminent."
September 16 -- Susan Rice, U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, on CNN's "State of the Union" with Candy Crowley: "There was a hateful video that was disseminated on the Internet. It had nothing to do with the United States government,
Susan Rice insisted to television viewers that the incident “was not a preplanned, premeditated attack,” but rather a spontaneous reaction to an anti-Muslim Web video.
September 18 -- Jay Carney:
"Our belief, based on the information we have, is it was the video that caused the unrest in Cairo, and the video and the unrest in Cairo that helped -- that precipitated some of the unrest in Benghazi and elsewhere.
September 19 -- Jay Carney:
"Right now I'm saying we don't have evidence at this point that this was premeditated or preplanned to coincide on a -- to happen on a specific date or coincide with that anniversary."

September 20 -- President Obama responding to a question about the possible involvement of al Qaeda: "What we do know is that the natural protests that arose because of the outrage over the video were used as an excuse by extremists to see if they can also directly harm U.S. interests."
Finally.....
September 20 -- Jay Carney:
"It is, I think, self-evident that what happened in Benghazi was a terrorist attack. Our embassy was attacked violently, and the result was four deaths of American officials."

September 25 -- President Obama on ABC's "The View," in response to interviewer Joy Behar's question, "I heard Hillary Clinton say it was an act of terrorism. Is it? What do you say?": "We're still doing an investigation. "



Asked a direct question about Clinton calling the attack a terrorist attack on the view... Is it? What do you say?" , he STILL refused to say Benghazi was a terrorist attack.
in plain simple words.....all he need to due was nod or say yes.....

All of this in total and in context says he must have talking about some generic attacks on Americans in general and not specifically the attack in Benghazi
 
Because Romney failed to make his point?

I still don't even get why you think it matters. It's not like they used a report they knew had been discredited a year prior to draw us into a war. What is different because they were not sure about whether it was premeditated or not and by whom?

Iraq war Resolution was PASSED by the Senate and House on 10/11/2002
The NIE was also October 2002
The invasion started 3/19/2003....4 months after the vote passed.

http://www.fas.org/irp/cia/product/iraq-wmd.html

I also have the infamous quotes from Democrats from 1998 up to 2002 demanding something be done about Saddam and his WMD....if you want to see them....
They pre-date the Bush Administration...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top