Chickenshit PAC Once Again Shuts Out Gay & Atheist Groups, Welcomes White Nationalist

Ok. And being a conservative of sorts means I approve or support all that CPAC does?

Have I spoken out against atheists on this board ever? Have I spoken out in favor of white nationalists on this board ever? Do I speak out against gay people on this board?

he's a fake libertarian that just makes up bullshit about other members here.
 
Where is the personal attack? CPAC presumably knows what is of interest to conservatives and I challenged you three to tell us otherwise. Why do you think I mentioned you three rather than say ILA/DY or others?

From Dipshit String: They know what appeals conservatives like cawacko, superfreak and threedee.

You stated quite clearly that what they did appeals to us. You based your bullshit on what? Oh yeah, NOTHING. You are simply full of shit.

You didn't challenge us otherwise. You fucking ignorant fake libertarian.
 
Ok. And being a conservative of sorts means I approve or support all that CPAC does?

Have I spoken out against atheists on this board ever? Have I spoken out in favor of white nationalists on this board ever? Do I speak out against gay people on this board?

Feel free to answer Zap since you know I'm changing the subject and getting my ass handed to me.
 
You again began in your first sentence with a personal attack. So do shut your whiny mangina.


Oh god, stfu crybaby. I should not have included you in this group.

Here I thought you might care that CPAC seems real cozy with White Nationalists but you are more concerned with whether your wig is on straight.
 
Where is the personal attack? CPAC presumably knows what is of interest to conservatives and I challenged you three to tell us otherwise. Why do you think I mentioned you three rather than say ILA/DY or others?

you are too ignorant to even know my positions, I am most certainly fiscally conservative... but I am agnostic and could care less what any of you anti religious or religious types believe. I respect your right to ignore science, as ignorant as you are, it is still your right to ramble on incoherently on topics you don't understand.

Have I ever encouraged white supremacy groups? No
Have I ever been against gay couples being married? No

yet in your continuing ignorance you pretend those things would appeal to me. Because you are a fucking idiot... and a fake libertarian.
 
Oh god, stfu crybaby. I should not have included you in this group.

Here I thought you might care that CPAC seems real cozy with White Nationalists but you are more concerned with whether your wig is on straight.

You are truly comical. You deliberately tried to lump us in with them. You failed. Now in your embarrassment you want to pretend it was just a mistake on your part?

You could care less what we think about CPAC. Your intentions were quite clear in the OP. You wanted to again show the board what a douche bag you are.
 
Ok. And being a conservative of sorts means I approve or support all that CPAC does?

Have I spoken out against atheists on this board ever? Have I spoken out in favor of white nationalists on this board ever? Do I speak out against gay people on this board?

No answer here String?
 
actually... not so much... perhaps you should work with them. You would find out they are not the overly sensitive types that left wing nuts tend to be.


I do work with them, that is why I know they would be offended by your calling others retards. It is also why I rarely use the word.
 
You stated quite clearly that what they did appeals to us. You based your bullshit on what? Oh yeah, NOTHING. You are simply full of shit.

You didn't challenge us otherwise. You fucking ignorant fake libertarian.


It's a personal attack to suggest that CPAC seeks to appeal to conservatives? OOOOooookay. I based it on you all being conservatives, dummy.

Yes, I am challenging you three. I clearly should not have included you since you are more interested in running interference for the scum. Let's pretend I said some other sorta socially moderate conservative we might expect to be embarrassed by CPAC, like grind, and not you, crybaby.
 
I'll tell you what, you kick me between the legs, I'll kick you between the legs, and let's see which one of us gets on their feet faster.

Um...to be clear, I would never do that to a woman, but just for the sake of argument... If I kicked first, I would be on my feet. Thus I would win.
 
He has no interest in a discussion. He is here to make accusations and be dishonest about peoples positions. He has no desire to actually discuss his douchebaggery.

I've had no problems with him in the past but yeah this is pretty f'ing weak.

I notice Zappa tried to chime in with a little shot from the peanut gallery but won't come back and defend it.
 
you are too ignorant to even know my positions, I am most certainly fiscally conservative... but I am agnostic and could care less what any of you anti religious or religious types believe. I respect your right to ignore science, as ignorant as you are, it is still your right to ramble on incoherently on topics you don't understand.

Have I ever encouraged white supremacy groups? No
Have I ever been against gay couples being married? No

yet in your continuing ignorance you pretend those things would appeal to me. Because you are a fucking idiot... and a fake libertarian.

But you support politicians and a movement closely tied to all of those things, science denier.
 
It's a personal attack to suggest that CPAC seeks to appeal to conservatives? OOOOooookay. I based it on you all being conservatives, dummy.

Yes, I am challenging you three. I clearly should not have included you since you are more interested in running interference for the scum. Let's pretend I said some other sorta socially moderate conservative we might expect to be embarrassed by CPAC, like grind, and not you, crybaby.

Ah yes, the fake libertarians MO. He attacks people on the board and insinuates that they hold positions that they clearly do not, they respond by telling him such. Then our fake libertarian pretends that means they are providing cover for whomever he was trying to attach the other board members to.

"They know what appeals conservatives like cawacko, superfreak and threedee."

Yeah... the above was just a challenge. Not a direct comment on what appeals to us.

String... you are a fucking idiot.
 
But you support politicians and a movement closely tied to all of those things, science denier.

See... now you do it again... we both know you are the one that denies science. Now that I commented on that you will again pretend that I am the one trying to divert the thread? Yeah... typical MO for our fake libertarian String.
 
String apparently thinks that if you are conservative fiscally that must mean you are conservative in all matters. Apparently the poor dimwit is just too far down the desh path to ever be worthy of an actual discussion.
 
Back
Top