choices

evince said:
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/jan/14/news/la-pn-supreme-court-rnc-voter-fraud-20130114



Supreme Court denies RNC bid to end voter fraud consent decree

January 14, 2013|By David G. Savage


The Supreme Court refused to lift a consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its fight against voter fraud.

The Supreme Court refused to lift a consent decree that bars the Republican… (Caroyln Kaster / Associated…)


WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has refused to lift a 30-year consent decree that bars the Republican National Committee from targeting racial and ethnic minorities in its efforts to end fraudulent voting.

The justices without comment turned down an appeal from RNC lawyers who said the decree has become “antiquated” and is “increasingly used as political weapon” by Democrats during national campaigns.

For their part, lawyers for the Democratic National Committee had argued that recent campaigns show the “consent degree remains necessary today.”

The court’s action is a victory for the DNC, and it comes after an election year in which the two parties regularly exchanged charges over “voter fraud” and “voter intimidation.” But most of the recent battles have been fought on the state level, and it is not clear whether the long-standing consent decree has had much impact.
Click to expand...

the date?
 
No, facts don't have an expiration Desh. That's one of the few things you get right.

As always it's a pleasure to spend several hours with you in the morning reliving Ground Hog's day having the same conversation over and over.
 
evince said:
because you keep refusing these facts
Click to expand...

The FACT is the argument against voter ID laws is that it disenfranchises blacks. You've been asked several times why blacks can't provide for themselves what white people do in the way of an accepted ID. Do you have an answer?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top