Christopher Steele: the man behind the dossier

Robo said:
Then you have evidence that Steele didn't actually testify in a British court that he had serious doubts about any truth being in the dossier, right?
Click to expand...

Cut the crap and give us a link to what Steele actually said, then we can discuss it.

What he may have said is that he couldn't be 100% sure of any specific information in the dossier. That would be a perfectly honest statement, because the dossier is RAW INTELLIGENCE. Do you understand what that means?

Otoh, if he was a blustering con artist like Trump he would have said: it's all true, 100%, guaranteed! Don't you think?
 
dude steele has admitted its unverified, please get off the paint fumes.

it was lies presented to a judge to spy on carter page, by deep state globalist babyeaters.
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
Cut the crap and give us a link to what Steele actually said, then we can discuss it.

What he may have said is that he couldn't be 100% sure of any specific information in the dossier. That would be a perfectly honest statement, because the dossier is RAW INTELLIGENCE. Do you understand what that means?

Otoh, if he was a blustering con artist like Trump he would have said: it's all true, 100%, guaranteed! Don't you think?
Click to expand...

You might as well talk to a post.. He has no clue what raw intelligence means.
 
BOMBSHELL: Steele Admits Fake Dossier Fabricated So Democrats Could Overturn Election Outcome
Trump-Russia dossier was created so Clinton could challenge 2016 election results – Steele
RT.com

The British ex-spy who authored the infamous dossier alleging collusion between Donald Trump and the Kremlin said one of his goals was to give Hillary Clinton legal basis to challenge the 2016 election results.

Christopher Steele’s salacious 17-page report was commissioned by Fusion GPS, a firm connected to Clinton’s campaign.

“Based on that advice, parties such as the Democratic National Committee and HFACC Inc. (also known as ‘Hillary for America’) could consider steps they would be legally entitled to take to challenge the validity of the outcome of that election,” Steele wrote in recently unsealed declaration that was published by the Washington Times.

His statement is part of a series of answers which Steele provided in a defamation suit brought by three Russians who head Alfa Bank, who were named in the dossier as part of the alleged collusion conspiracy between Trump and the Kremlin.

The court challenge never came. Instead, the unsubstantiated dossier was leaked to news outlets such as BuzzFeed, fuelling Russiagate hysteria and serving as the backbone of a two-year probe that has yet to corroborate any of the document’s core claims. The document was also used by the FBI to obtain a warrant to spy on former Trump aide Carter Page, who was accused by Steele of meeting secretly with Kremlin insiders in Moscow. Incredibly, former FBI Director James Comey admitted that his agency had not verified the dossier’s contents before using it to justify the warrant.
The dossier itself has apparently fallen out of favor with many of its early champions: One of the first journalists to report on Steele’s research has stated that many of Steele’s central claims have yet to be substantiated and are “likely false.”

Steele faces similar legal trouble in London, where he is being sued for defamation by Russian entrepreneur Aleksej Gubarev. In one of his memos, Steele accused Gubarev of personally hacking DNC computers. Gubarev has also sued BuzzFeed for publishing the unverified claim as part of its uncritical coverage of the dossier.The defamation case against Steele was dismissed by a DC Superior Court judge, but lawyers representing the Russian bankers have launched an appeal in US District court, attaching Steele’s revelatory statements as part of their filing.

Steele claimed that internet traffic data had been observed between Alfa Bank and a computer served linked to the Trump Organization. The allegation has yet to be proven, with some reports suggesting that the flagged data actually originated from an internet spam farm based outside Philadelphia.

___http://themillenniumreport.com/2018/12/bombshell-steele-admits-fake-dossier-fabricated-so-democrats-could-overturn-election-outcome/
 
AssHatZombie said:
BOMBSHELL: Steele Admits Fake Dossier Fabricated So Democrats Could Overturn Election Outcome
Trump-Russia dossier was created so Clinton could challenge 2016 election results – Steele
RT.com
Click to expand...

This is what Steele wrote: “Fusion’s immediate client was law firm Perkins Coie. It engaged Fusion to obtain information necessary for Perkins Coie LLP to provide legal advice on the potential impact of Russian involvement on the legal validity of the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election.

“Based on that advice, parties such as the Democratic National Committee and HFACC Inc. (also known as ‘Hillary for America’) could consider steps they would be legally entitled to take to challenge the validity of the outcome of that election.”

This obviously refers to events AFTER the election, when the DNC was considering a legal challenge to the result. But no challenge was filed so nothing came of it.

Of course, Steele was hired by Fusion 5 months BEFORE the election. The RW crapsites and RT want you to think this was so Steele could fabricate evidence of a Trump-Russia connection just in case Trump won - then the DNC could mount a legal challenge. But they didn't.

How pathetic is that? It's a story about nothing.
 
Tranquillus in Exile said:
This is what Steele wrote: “Fusion’s immediate client was law firm Perkins Coie. It engaged Fusion to obtain information necessary for Perkins Coie LLP to provide legal advice on the potential impact of Russian involvement on the legal validity of the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election.

“Based on that advice, parties such as the Democratic National Committee and HFACC Inc. (also known as ‘Hillary for America’) could consider steps they would be legally entitled to take to challenge the validity of the outcome of that election.”

This obviously refers to events AFTER the election, when the DNC was considering a legal challenge to the result. But no challenge was filed so nothing came of it.

Of course, Steele was hired by Fusion 5 months BEFORE the election. The RW crapsites and RT want you to think this was so Steele could fabricate evidence of a Trump-Russia connection just in case Trump won - then the DNC could mount a legal challenge. But they didn't.

How pathetic is that? It's a story about nothing.
Click to expand...

How fresh of you to actually deal in facts and timelines.
 
AssHatZombie said:
BOMBSHELL: Steele Admits Fake Dossier Fabricated So Democrats Could Overturn Election Outcome
Trump-Russia dossier was created so Clinton could challenge 2016 election results – Steele
RT.com

The British ex-spy who authored the infamous dossier alleging collusion between Donald Trump and the Kremlin said one of his goals was to give Hillary Clinton legal basis to challenge the 2016 election results.

Christopher Steele’s salacious 17-page report was commissioned by Fusion GPS, a firm connected to Clinton’s campaign.

“Based on that advice, parties such as the Democratic National Committee and HFACC Inc. (also known as ‘Hillary for America’) could consider steps they would be legally entitled to take to challenge the validity of the outcome of that election,” Steele wrote in recently unsealed declaration that was published by the Washington Times.

His statement is part of a series of answers which Steele provided in a defamation suit brought by three Russians who head Alfa Bank, who were named in the dossier as part of the alleged collusion conspiracy between Trump and the Kremlin.

The court challenge never came. Instead, the unsubstantiated dossier was leaked to news outlets such as BuzzFeed, fuelling Russiagate hysteria and serving as the backbone of a two-year probe that has yet to corroborate any of the document’s core claims. The document was also used by the FBI to obtain a warrant to spy on former Trump aide Carter Page, who was accused by Steele of meeting secretly with Kremlin insiders in Moscow. Incredibly, former FBI Director James Comey admitted that his agency had not verified the dossier’s contents before using it to justify the warrant.
The dossier itself has apparently fallen out of favor with many of its early champions: One of the first journalists to report on Steele’s research has stated that many of Steele’s central claims have yet to be substantiated and are “likely false.”

Steele faces similar legal trouble in London, where he is being sued for defamation by Russian entrepreneur Aleksej Gubarev. In one of his memos, Steele accused Gubarev of personally hacking DNC computers. Gubarev has also sued BuzzFeed for publishing the unverified claim as part of its uncritical coverage of the dossier.The defamation case against Steele was dismissed by a DC Superior Court judge, but lawyers representing the Russian bankers have launched an appeal in US District court, attaching Steele’s revelatory statements as part of their filing.

Steele claimed that internet traffic data had been observed between Alfa Bank and a computer served linked to the Trump Organization. The allegation has yet to be proven, with some reports suggesting that the flagged data actually originated from an internet spam farm based outside Philadelphia.

___http://themillenniumreport.com/2018/12/bombshell-steele-admits-fake-dossier-fabricated-so-democrats-could-overturn-election-outcome/
Click to expand...

What is Steele's court date in London or had it already happened?

curious

"Steele claimed that internet traffic data had been observed between Alfa Bank and a computer served linked to the Trump Organization. The allegation has yet to be proven, with some reports suggesting that the flagged data actually originated from an internet spam farm based outside Philadelphia."
 
kudzu said:
What is Steele's court date in London or had it already happened?

curious

"Steele claimed that internet traffic data had been observed between Alfa Bank and a computer served linked to the Trump Organization. The allegation has yet to be proven, with some reports suggesting that the flagged data actually originated from an internet spam farm based outside Philadelphia."
Click to expand...

the ides of screw you it's fake.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top