In other words, you are full of shit.
Are you really claiming you don't get paid to write this BS?
In other words, you are full of shit.
Cuts in spending already passed by Congress
Using the second justification -- comparing Obama’s request to what the GOP-controlled House voted to spend for fiscal year 2012 -- has the advantage of not being speculative. Here’s the amount passed by the House for fiscal 2012 (figures also rounded):
Worldwide Security Protection (ongoing operations): $1.31 billion
Worldwide Security Protection (overseas contigency operations): $247 million
Embassy Security, Construction, and Maintenance -- Worldwide Security Upgrades: $755 million
Total: $2.31 billion
The difference between these two amounts is nearly $327 million -- a bit above the $300 million Biden cited.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/oct/16/joe-biden/joe-biden-says-paul-ryan-cut-embassy-security-300-/
I am supposed to be the one with short term memory loss.??? You need to calm yourself... what building are you referring to?
I am sure they don't give a fuck about you either. But the soldiers, like the CIA, know there is a potential to go in harms way. So your comments indicated you didn't care about those that knew ahead of time what might happen. Glad you clarified to stated that the only ones you hate are those that are slightly older.
The difference between these two amounts is nearly $327 million -- a bit above the $300 million Biden cited.
Ultimately, a final bill with slightly higher amounts than the House’s initial bill -- about $60 million more -- was passed by both chambers and signed by the president.
But this approach has problems as well. For starters, Biden glosses over the fact that the president did ultimately sign the bill with the new lower funding amount, meaning he shares some responsibility for the lower level. (All presidential budget requests are opening offers that inevitably become subject to negotiation.)
The main problem with Biden’s claim, however, is that it’s not really what he was referring to in his claim from the debate. Biden said Ryan "cut embassy security in his budget by $300 million below what we asked for," but what passed the House wasn’t Ryan’s budget blueprint -- it was an actual spending bill that emerged from the House Appropriations Committee.
This may be a distinction of interest only to budget wonks, but by muddying the difference, Biden is able to hold up Ryan’s budget -- a long-standing target of Democratic attacks for its approach to Medicare and other federal programs -- as the perpetrator of the cuts, rather than the more obscure appropriations bill.
Our ruling
Both ways of defending the claim of a $300 million cut have some justification, but also come with problems. Extrapolating from Ryan’s budget is a speculative exercise, while the enacted appropriations figures were not directly shaped by Ryan's budget. On balance, we rate the claim Half True.
Half a loaf is better than none. Ryan's budget led to the death of four CIA agents. Your outrage is False. End of story.
I was just wondering if anyone had seen a you tube video that might piss off the muslims again? You got to tread lightly around those bastards. No telling how the practitioners of the religion of peace are going to react to something that offends them.
Did Ryan's austerity budget cut 327 million from embassy security? Yes. End of blathering. You can go home now.
False. Absolutely, unequivocally false. Typical liberal, always have to blame republicans, even if it means lying.
Passed by democrats and signed by Obama. And the congressional report said the budget played ZERO role.
You had better put me on ignore and thread ban me, because by the time I'm through with you, you will be nothing but an incoherent babbling troll. Oh wait, you already are.
Passed by democrats and signed by Obama. And the congressional report said the budget played ZERO role.
You had better put me on ignore and thread ban me, because by the time I'm through with you, you will be nothing but an incoherent babbling troll. Oh wait, you already are.
I provided 3 separate proofs. Article excerpts as well as links. I can print 5000 more if you like. Would that be enough for you or are you just a hack?
Eat sand. You provided no proof.
What are you, 12 years old?
Half a loaf is better than none. Ryan's budget led to the death of four CIA agents. Your outrage is False. End of story.
FACTS are such a bitch to pinheads....so we post again and again...as many times as necessary...
fact,
the Congressional Research Service has documented that Congress, whether led by Democrats and Republicans, year after year did not fully fund the various pots of money for embassy security. (See page 25.) The State Department, for instance, was shortchanged by $142 million in fiscal year 2010, when Democrats controlled both houses of Congress.
fact,
while Boxer claims that Republicans “cut” the budget, she is only comparing it to what the Obama administration proposed. The reality is that funding for embassy security has increased significantly in recent years.
fact,
State Department officials were specifically asked if a lack of financial resources played a role in the attack. The answer was no.
Oct. 10, 2012 hearing:
QUESTION: It has been suggested that budget cuts were responsible for a lack of security in Benghazi. And I'd like to ask Ms. Lamb, you made this decision personally. Was there any budget consideration and lack of budget which led you not to increase the number of people in the security force there?
DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF STATE CHARLENE LAMB: No, sir.
***
QUESTION: So there's not a budget problem. It's not you all don't have the money to do this?
LAMB: Sir, it's a volatile situation. We will move assets to cover that.
May 8, 2013 hearing:
QUESTION: Mr. Nordstrom, you were on that panel. Do you remember what she [Lamb] said?
REGIONAL SECURITY OFFICER ERIC NORDSTROM: Yes, she said that resources was not an issue. And I think I would also point to the ARB report, if I'm not mistaken, that they talked to our chief financial officer with D.S. [Diplomatic Security], who also said that resources were not an issue.
http://tinyurl.com/ahcz8zc
pRune ....a proven idiot time and time again, over and over....a true Democrat.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/13-benghazis-that-occurre_b_3246847.html
13DIFFERENT BENGHAZI styled attacks during GWB's presidency and not a peep from partisan Righties over the DOZENS OF DEATHS.
Let's be clear...it's only when they can score cheap political points off of death do they make a fuss.
How many died needlessly when Dubbya was in charge ya fucking hypocrite?
Who gives a fuck about four CIA operatives who knew what could happen when they signed up for Foreign service?
What about the 3000 plus on 9-11, or the million plus since in the two wars he started?
Bullshit! It was your red congress that denied requests for increased security at embassies. You can blame Boner, Ryan, Cantor, and the rest of the red traitors.
You are so clearly a paid poster.