Clarence Thomas — who let a GOP megadonor foot bills for him for years — said being a

It is not racist to call out a corrupt public official even if he's not your same race. What's racist is your friends referring to a mixed race person as a "mongrel." Is your spawn a "mongrel"?

Thanks for letting us know where you stand on corruption, graft, and bribery. Foursquare in favor!

Wait, a "special ed teacher" who doesn't call out using the word "retard" and the parent of a mixed-race child who doesn't call out using the word "mongrel?"

Say it isn't so!
 
You apparently didn’t bother to read the rest of the quote where he says the job is definitely worth doing because of the satisfaction of justice.

His point was that doing it for just the money is not why someone should be a justice.

Typical liberal cherry picking

singlemankenny doesn't pick cherries....he picks cowpies....
 
A net worth, ranging between $2.5 and 8 million, most of it in property and pension, is not filthy rich and is not even remotely unusual for someone who has spent 45 years working as a US senator and vice president.

and receiving bribes from China......
 
That certainly does say a lot... and it's really kind of hilarious that they're worried about a friend of the Judge... who is generous because he can be....
... but they are totally in denial when it comes to how in the world all the Biden's pad their bank accounts.... with $$$$ from those "friends" in Far Away places...


Name names of these "friends in Far Away places"..,. :laugh:
 
Anita Hill told the truth.

And Clarence Thomas is an utter disgrace. The current court in general is a disgrace - a completely partisan, politicized and corrupt institution.
 
Wait, a "special ed teacher" who doesn't call out using the word "retard" and the parent of a mixed-race child who doesn't call out using the word "mongrel?"

Say it isn't so!

Wish I could, but the truth is the truth. Some people will even throw their own alleged child's honor under the bus, than lose an anonymous Internet "friend." Sickening, really.
 
Name names of these "friends in Far Away places"..,. :laugh:

"... all the Biden's pad.... [Rod Serling voice activated]: "Imagine, if you will, a place where a self-proclaimed 'teacher' doesn't understand the difference between a possessive noun or name, and a plural noun or name." :laugh: :rofl2: :laugh:
 
In fact, Grassley who was running this real "witch hunt" is backtracking. He says no evidence has been found and Biden's open-as-hell taxes do not show it. Top will not care. He is a right-wing believer.

MAGATs are stupid that way. BTW, Toxic TOP is a she, allegedly.
 
Between this and the shit his wife pulled should be more than enough to bounce his ass off the court.

But he's there doing what the old guard GOP wants ... hell, he wasn't really qualified to be on that bench in the first place.

I remember when the GOP raised hell about Al Gore getting campaign contributions from a Chinese businessman with ties to mainland Communist China. But it seems similar speculation regarding Thomas does not apply. Hmm, can you say hypocrites boys & girls? Sure you can ... I knew you could.
 
In fact, Grassley who was running this real "witch hunt" is backtracking. He says no evidence has been found and Biden's open-as-hell taxes do not show it. Top will not care. He is a right-wing believer.

And that is the really sad thing about righties. They will deny an indisputable fact. You can prove someting 20 different ways but they're still :seenoevil::hearnoevil: .
 
How did we do that? I know nothing of that. Do you know saying every is a virtually guaranteed false post?

I believe concart said it best as an 'expression'.........not to be taken seriously.............the real point is that NOBODY on the left criticized her for it...you all remained SILENT, which implies support in your leftist eyes.
 
I believe concart said it best as an 'expression'.........not to be taken seriously.............the real point is that NOBODY on the left criticized her for it...you all remained SILENT, which implies support in your leftist eyes.

No, it does not. Is your logic that weak? You assume all the leftys read it. Not knowing if a story is true or not, often results in no comment. You saying it is, has no weight.
 
Clarence Thomas’s decisions have been benefiting wealthy donors like Harlan Crow — for decades


Thomas has, over and over and over, ruled against donor disclosure, and he has also repeatedly ruled against having any contribution limits at all, allowing the wealthy to spend without interference from pesky government regulations. Even if Thomas hasn’t specifically benefitted Crow through his decisions (although reports show Crow’s interests have come before the court) he has undeniably helped to make megadonors like Crow more powerful and more insulated from public criticism.



https://www.citizensforethics.org/n...-wealthy-donors-like-harlan-crow-for-decades/



Clarence Thomas’s Billionaire Friend Did Have Business Before the Supreme Court
Justice didn’t recuse from rejection of architecture firm case
Harlan Crow said he had no knowledge of or involvement in case


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...ore-the-supreme-court?leadSource=uverify wall
 
Back
Top