Climate Changers - VOLCANIC eruption expected in ICELAND - 800 earthquakes overnight

[domer76]

Yes, I do.

You, on the other hand, think 4 degrees colder would be better.

LOL

Are you really that dense or is it just a show for this forum?

You are actually a liberal and making it look like right wingers are so fucking stupid, right?

 

[Bigdog]

LOL

Are you really that dense or is it just a show for this forum?

You are actually a liberal and making it look like right wingers are so fucking stupid, right?

Crackie, pleez

Only white lib morons think colder is better for life on Earth.

 

[domer76]

Crackie, pleez

Only white lib morons think colder is better for life on Earth.

So fucking funny. You think that tired copy and paste of yours actually means anything. The entire history of mankind isn’t even a sliver on that meaningless graph.

Your do science illiterate that you don’t even realize it.


Pathetic clown

 

[Lionfish]

Could it be possible that sacrificing AL Gore to the volcano gods would stop this terrible threat to humanity? Big Al, step up to the plate and do your part.

 

[Into the Night]

Last month, the earth just passed the 2°C threshold for the first time. Just a harbinger of things to come.

What '2 deg C' threshold???

 

[Into the Night]

That would include you and cut-and-paste Bigdog. I doubt he made it through high school.

LIF. Grow up.

 

[Into the Night]

Why would I ever have the need to respond to every one of your posts, Cletus?

I had more science under my belt by 8th grade than most of you morons have for your entire lives. Jethro.

Nah. That's just a beer gut.

 

[Into the Night]

You're such a bullshitter, fuck off spud boi!!

[FONT="]If emissions remain high over the next few decades, the AI predicts a one-in-two chance that Earth will become 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 Fahrenheit) hotter on average compared to pre-industrial times by the middle of this century, and a more than four-in-five chance of reaching that threshold by 2060.[/FONT]

https://news.stanford.edu/2023/01/3...edicted a one,threshold between 2044 and 2065.

Oh no! MORE Doom and Gloom!

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth.
No gas or vapor (including any Magick Holy Gas) has the capability to warm the Earth. You cannot create energy out of nothing. You are ignoring the 1st law of thermodynamics.

 

[Into the Night]

Crackie, pleez

Yet you do exactly the same thing he does.

It is not possible to measure the temperature of the Earth nor the global atmospheric CO2 content. You are still ignoring statistical mathematics.

Only white lib morons think colder is better for life on Earth.

Considering that people, plants, and animals live anywhere from the equator to the Antarctic, that's rather a silly comment.

 

[Into the Night]

So fucking funny. You think that tired copy and paste of yours actually means anything. The entire history of mankind isn’t even a sliver on that meaningless graph.

Your do science illiterate that you don’t even realize it.


Pathetic clown

No science here...move along...move along...
No mathematics here...move along...move along...

 

[Bigdog]

Considering that people, plants, and animals live anywhere from the equator to the Antarctic, that's rather a silly comment.

It's very kind of you to point out that there is massive diversity of life in the equatorial belt. The polar ice caps look virtually barren of life in comparison.

 

[Into the Night]

It's very kind of you to point out that there is massive diversity of life in the equatorial belt. The polar ice caps look virtually barren of life in comparison.

The Arctic is primarily a sea. It has a lot of life living in it including many types of fish and whales. There are also people living in arctic regions on land, including Canada and Alaska.
The Antarctic is a desert. It still has people, animals, and plants living on it and in the surrounding seas including penguins, grass, brush, turns, albatross, whales, petrels, krill, seals, and even seagulls.

Neither is 'devoid of life' or 'barren' at all.

You will also find life living quite well in the hottest deserts, including lizards, snakes, turtles, scorpions, ants, grasshoppers (and locusts), termites, bees, flies, rabbits, coyotes, and many different kinds of birds. You will also find plants such as cacti, trees, sagebrush, grass, and a huge variety of wildflowers.

The desert is far from 'barren' or 'devoid of life'.

 

[Bigdog]

The Arctic is primarily a sea. It has a lot of life living in it including many types of fish and whales. There are also people living in arctic regions on land, including Canada and Alaska.
The Antarctic is a desert. It still has people, animals, and plants living on it and in the surrounding seas including penguins, grass, brush, turns, albatross, whales, petrels, krill, seals, and even seagulls.

Neither is 'devoid of life' or 'barren' at all.

You will also find life living quite well in the hottest deserts, including lizards, snakes, turtles, scorpions, ants, grasshoppers (and locusts), termites, bees, flies, rabbits, coyotes, and many different kinds of birds. You will also find plants such as cacti, trees, sagebrush, grass, and a huge variety of wildflowers.

The desert is far from 'barren' or 'devoid of life'.

I used the word "diversity". There is no comparison.

And the diversity of coral reefs far outstrips the diversity under the polar ice.

 

[domer76]

What '2 deg C' threshold???

Derp

 

[Into the Night]

I used the word "diversity".

As a diversion from the point. Pivot fallacy.

There is no comparison.

There is. Life exists quite happily in a wide range of temperatures. THAT is the point you keep missing.

And the diversity of coral reefs far outstrips the diversity under the polar ice.

There are no coral reefs in the deep oceans.

 

[Into the Night]

Derp

So you don't know. Gotit.

 

[Bigdog]

As a diversion from the point. Pivot fallacy.

There is. Life exists quite happily in a wide range of temperatures. THAT is the point you keep missing.

There are no coral reefs in the deep oceans.

I am well aware of extremophiles.

I did not say coral reefs are in the deep ocean. Another pointless comment by you.

Biodiversity is greatest in the tropical rainforests and coral reefs of the equatorial belt, not at the polar caps. That is the point you get wrong.


And please stop trying to redefine the words I choose to use.

 

[Into the Night]

I am well aware of extremophiles.

Not a word.

I did not say coral reefs are in the deep ocean. Another pointless comment by you.

You made a comparison between coral reefs and the polar sea. THAT is pointless.

Biodiversity is greatest in the tropical rainforests and coral reefs of the equatorial belt, not at the polar caps. That is the point you get wrong.

'Biodiversity' is not a word. It's a meaningless buzzword.

I don't care what life lives where. YOU decided to completely pivot away from my comment, bringing up an unrelated straw man (a fallacy) and then tell me that I'm 'wrong'.

And please stop trying to redefine the words I choose to use.

YOU are the one using useless buzzwords. YOU are the one that pivoted to this pointless straw man. This is YOUR problem. Inversion fallacy. Do not try to blame YOUR problem on me.

 

[Bigdog]

Not a word.

You made a comparison between coral reefs and the polar sea. THAT is pointless.

'Biodiversity' is not a word. It's a meaningless buzzword.

I don't care what life lives where. YOU decided to completely pivot away from my comment, bringing up an unrelated straw man (a fallacy) and then tell me that I'm 'wrong'.


YOU are the one using useless buzzwords. YOU are the one that pivoted to this pointless straw man. This is YOUR problem. Inversion fallacy. Do not try to blame YOUR problem on me.

"Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
ex·trem·o·phile
/ikˈstrēməˌfīl,ekˈstrēməˌfīl/
nounBIOLOGY
a microorganism, especially an archaean, that lives in conditions of extreme temperature, acidity, alkalinity, or chemical concentration."


"Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · Learn more
bi·o·di·ver·si·ty
/ˌbīōˌdīˈvərsədē/
noun
the variety of life in the world or in a particular habitat or ecosystem."



Now that you have demonstrated your ignorance on the topic, what IS your point?

 

[Bigdog]

So fucking funny. You think that tired copy and paste of yours actually means anything. The entire history of mankind isn’t even a sliver on that meaningless graph.

Your do science illiterate that you don’t even realize it.


Pathetic clown

I understand you can not comprehend s simple climate history chart. We've already established that this thread is too sciency for Algorian white libs.

Yes, humans are a blink of an eye in geological time scales. What is your point?