Climategate continues...

Cancel 2016.2

Cancel 2016.2

The Almighty
Hey, trust in the CRU's reliability is now in question and the NOAA is feeling a bit left out. Attached is a 10 page article on some of the shenanigans the NOAA has been up to.

http://icecap.us/images/uploads/NOAAroleinclimategate.pdf

I am sure the fear mongers will instantly attempt to attack the author rather than address the data within the article. But for the open minded individuals, this is a pretty good read.
 
In Canada the number of stations dropped from 600 to 35 in 2009. The percentage of stations in the lower elevations (below 300 feet) tripled and those at higher elevations above 3000 feet were reduced in half. Canada’s semi-permanent depicted warmth comes from interpolating from more southerly locations to fill northerly vacant grid boxes, even as a pure average of the available stations shows a COOLING. Just 1 thermometer remains for everything north of latitude 65N – that station is Eureka. Eureka according to Wikipedia has been described as “The Garden Spot of the Arctic” due to the flora and fauna abundant around the Eureka area, more so than anywhere else in the High Arctic. Winters are frigid but summers are slightly warmer than at other places in the Canadian Arctic.
Click to expand...

Yeah... nothing to see here.... move along...
 
Superfreak said:
My guess is they will still try... they are not ones to let evidence get in the way of their agenda.
Click to expand...

They may try, but it's not nearly the holy grail to them that HC is. Based on the pussy leadership of Ried I don't expect much of a fight. Not many economist even on thier side think that it won't hurt the economy. Essentially it's a tax on consumers to get them to use less energy. Yeah, that's great for growth.
 
Don't let me interrupt your circle jerk.

Climate change deniers want to kill people. They enjoy killing people. That's the source of their insane denialism.
 
Topspin said:
They may try, but it's not nearly the holy grail to them that HC is. Based on the pussy leadership of Ried I don't expect much of a fight. Not many economist even on thier side think that it won't hurt the economy. Essentially it's a tax on consumers to get them to use less energy. Yeah, that's great for growth.
Click to expand...

The difference is that on Cap and Trade we have Republican votes from those interested in saving lives. Those interested in killing and murdering, like you, damo, and SF, would of course vote against it. But good individuals wouldn't.
 
HUGO STIGLITZ said:
Don't let me interrupt your circle jerk.

Climate change deniers want to kill people. They enjoy killing people. That's the source of their insane denialism.
Click to expand...

HUGO STIGLITZ said:
The difference is that on Cap and Trade we have Republican votes from those interested in saving lives. Those interested in killing and murdering, like you, damo, and SF, would of course vote against it. But good individuals wouldn't.
Click to expand...

HUGO STIGLITZ said:
Predictability that you would ignore the most proven theory in human history because you enjoy killing people?
Click to expand...

this is just full of awesome
 
HUGO STIGLITZ said:
Don't let me interrupt your circle jerk.

Climate change deniers want to kill people. They enjoy killing people. That's the source of their insane denialism.
Click to expand...

How does someone get this stupid? Do they just surrender their common sense or did they never have any to begin with?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top